|
Forum: General Talk
11-20-2007, 04:18 PM
|
| |
Here's an update as promised...
I am unaware of any laws that prohibit the taking of pictures of
anything that is viewable in a public venue. The only restriction that
I would see if a person was to take photographs of the interior of a
private dwelling or business while on the public right of way. There is
nothing to prohibit the taking of photos of buildings, public transit
vehicles or even accidents. Although some people may find it
distasteful in having their picture taken in public, I am unaware of
anything that would prohibit it. The exception would be of course if
someone is physically accosted or obstructed so that a picture can be
taken.
There may be restrictions on persons taking pictures where the public is
welcome but the property is private, such as a mall or a sporting
complex. Although the public is welcome, there may be restrictions on
the taking of pictures.... it is best to check with the administrative
staff that owns or controls the property.
With that said, there is nothing to prohibit a person from taking civil
action against a person for taking a picture especially if the picture
is subsequently published in a less than favourable light. Whether or
not the person succeeds is dependant on the courts.
Bottom line......... if it is viewable to the public, I see nothing
wrong with taking a picture of it. |
|
Forum: General Talk
10-19-2007, 03:33 PM
|
| |
Chako, it has been done but not, to my recollection, with a Canuck twist. The ambientlight link is very good and well written - thanks.
As a result, I finally got off my a$$ and wrote to the Mayor, Head of Transit, My Councilperson and the Police Commissioner to ask for their opinion and comments.
A couple of years ago I was stopped by a constable, from photographing a vehicle accident, without any reason given. I did manage to grab a couple of shots though.
|
