|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
07-07-2016, 08:22 AM
|
| |
I have no intention of repeating the whole equivalence debate here, but for what it's worth: I'm a believer (mostly, anyway).
That video is not up yet? Unless it's
You Tube
|
src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z4BDi3tph4M?controls=1" allowfullscreen>
|
, but I'd think the point of that was testing pixel shift?
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
07-05-2016, 03:20 AM
|
| |
OTOH the differences in size and weight between a K-1 with a 24-70/4 and a K-3 with a 16-50/2.8 would be smaller, if that 24-70/4 existed. This is arguably a more "equivalent" setup in terms of capabilities. The lenses would probably be about the same size/weight. The K-1 is still quite a bit heavier than the K-3, but there are fullframe DSLRs out there that are actually lighter than the K-3. So I think you could get yourself a fullframe setup with f/4 lenses, enjoy the fullframe advantages, and still have about the same weight to carry around. (currently, this is not the case with Pentax though)
|
