|
Forum: Lens Clubs
12-07-2011, 01:42 PM
|
| |
For that you need to stop buying lenses, instead you need to go out more and buy drinks to girls who will eventually become your models ;)
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
12-01-2011, 09:35 AM
|
| |
I never seen a "bad" 135mm :)
They all start from OK to great in my experience with over 100+ 135mm lenses.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
12-01-2011, 09:18 AM
|
| |
I got 4 copies of the K135/2.5, will likely part with at least one in upcoming weeks...tough decision about which one to let go...
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
09-28-2011, 06:36 PM
|
| |
+1 it's overexposed to me
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
09-23-2011, 04:53 PM
|
| |
Got this lens for a song and it's surprisingly sharp wide open and also has a nice 3D effect as shown in the above image.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
05-12-2011, 11:58 PM
|
| |
That's a sleepy Canon dude :) Nice catch.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
04-06-2011, 11:30 PM
|
| |
Nice. Looks like you had applied a bit of HDR :)
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
04-06-2011, 04:20 AM
|
| |
The SMC Pentax 135/3.5 is definitely better than the Takumar 135/f2.5 bayonet version. If you want a good and "affordable" 135/2.5 go for the Super Takumar 135/f2.5 M42 version. I personally prefer the SMC K135/2.5 but it's harder to find and also much more expensive.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
02-24-2011, 11:59 PM
|
| |
I agree with the fact that the 135 is a bit too long on crop sensor. I rarely go beyond 100mm on crop sensor. My 135 is only used when I'm taking picture from my 2nd floor balcony :)
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
01-13-2011, 05:19 AM
|
| |
No wonder why so many people consider K135/f2.5 to be one of the best 135mm out there...
The images speak for itself.
Wide open
Probably f4 or between f2.5 and f4
 |
