|
Forum: General Photography
08-11-2018, 05:26 PM
|
| |
.
woooo hooooo
Leave a10 in the camera strap.
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-11-2018, 05:12 PM
|
| |
Look what you started Hancock, are you proud of yourself?
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-11-2018, 04:34 PM
|
| |
Well aren't you just all over this? :D
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-10-2018, 06:18 PM
|
| |
I really don't do fat. :D
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-10-2018, 03:42 PM
|
| |
I grabbed one of those 55 1.4s from McBain. After all, my 50 1.7 is damaged, and it was my go to low light lens and $499 CAD is almost $300 off the regular price. Instead of paying a couple hundred to get the FA 50 1.7 repaired, this is a much better deal. I can still manual focus the FA.
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-10-2018, 05:51 AM
|
| |
I'll be knocking on your door.
"Is monochrome home?"
"no"
"Well then, can I come in and play with his toys?"
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-09-2018, 05:56 PM
|
| |
How often do you need fast AF on 50. If you do there's always the 55-300 PLM.
|
|
Forum: General Photography
08-09-2018, 11:59 AM
|
| |
A brief glance at images reduced to web size says the 55 1,4 overall, if you take into account, weight, size, portability and cost, might be the better option. And it's a lot easier to go for the 55 now that you know how it stacks up against the DFA*50 1.4, and secure in the knowledge there is not better coming for a long time if ever.
---------- Post added 08-09-18 at 03:09 PM ----------
At Henry's, currently $700 for the 55,
At Henry's, currently $1700 for the 50,
If the 55 is not that cheap, the 50 is doubly not that cheap. :D
|
