|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
11-28-2018, 12:03 PM
|
| |
A K-3 pixel density translates to 51 MP on FF. It's not that much different.
It's kind of funny how often people gt this wrong. You don't need a better lens because of the MP count, you need a better lens for smaller pixels sites.
People say a K-1 needs a better lens than a K-3, well, only on the edges. Within the crop sensor area, the K-1 is less demanding, not more.
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
11-28-2018, 11:37 AM
|
| |
I'm using an i7 quad core and K-1 images noticeably reduce my processing speed. Imagine what 60 MP would do. And I'm printing 42 inch abstract prints from my K-3. What would an average guy like me even contemplate 60 MP? Most of the time I don't need 36 MP. I just use it because I have it.
And when I'm shooting my K-3, unless I'm shooting in low light and have to go over 800 ISO, I don't miss 36 MP.
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
11-28-2018, 09:03 AM
|
| |
I can't even imaging caring about either 4k or 8k video. I'm still waiting for the promised 200 EV organic sensors.
|
