|
Forum: Lens Clubs
01-09-2012, 07:08 AM
|
| |
The ring itself, as many of you have guessed, is the one that's gone wrong. I have some experience with taking apart lenses, I've dissected four or five of them so far, but all Olympus OM, and this lens is extra-precious so I'd like to know what I'm doing before poking around with it.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
01-08-2012, 03:03 AM
|
| |
Does anyone here have experience with taking apart an SMC Takumar 35mm f/2? My copy of the lens has a problem with the aperture mechanism, the ring cannot turn past f/2. I need to take it apart, but I need to know exactly how, and which parts I definitely need to dismantle and which parts I don't, since this lens was a hand-me-down from my dad, so I don't want to damage it.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
08-19-2010, 05:50 AM
|
| |
You beat me to this post, I experienced this today with my S-M-C Takumar 135mm f/3.5.
Funny thing is, the hood was on, and isn't this lens supposed to be good at flare resistance?
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
07-19-2010, 06:32 AM
|
| |
Pardon me for asking, but why not?
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
07-02-2010, 07:10 AM
|
| |
Does anyone know if there is significant difference in the ease of turning the focusing ring between SMC and S-M-C?
My SMC 55/1.8 focusing ring seems a lot easier to twist, making focus harder, whereas the S-M-C 135/3.5 I have is nice, precise and easy to go from infinity to 1.5m.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
06-03-2010, 03:15 AM
|
| |
After lurking around for ages, I decided to post something that might be remotely acceptable...
(I think either wide open or 2.8)
SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8
Canon EOS 500
Fuji Superia 200
|
