|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-08-2014, 11:35 AM
|
| |
For portraits that level of sharpness is just about right. Altho 40mm is a little wide for the kind of portraits I like to capture.
Your little boy is being pixel peeped!
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-08-2014, 06:53 AM
|
| |
Which Pentax macro has the best bokeh in your opinion?
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-08-2014, 06:38 AM
|
| |
Perhaps Pentax needs to work out quality control kinks or something. I wonder how the "reference" model performs?
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-07-2014, 07:05 AM
|
| |
Everyone's photo needs are different. It just may be the ticket for you.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-07-2014, 06:52 AM
|
| |
It makes perfect sense. Why do you think so many Pentaxians' sport the 16-50 and 50-135? The combination of lenses cover a wide focal range with image quality that rivals some primes. A wide focal range can result in more photo opportunities.
You're making this generalization, not me. Primes, in my mind, are (generally) more application specific.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-07-2014, 04:35 AM
|
| |
Zooms are about practicality and getting the job done. This is where the 20-40 is puzzling and not convincing so far for $1,000.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-06-2014, 06:09 PM
|
| |
The 16-50 seems to be a more versatile option.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
01-06-2014, 06:04 PM
|
| |
This lens remains an enigma.
|
