Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
05-01-2010, 07:42 PM
|
|
Like I said, there files *were* accessed, so of course the "file accessed" time would be likely to change. But not the "file modified" time.
In any case, you shouldn't be using *either* of those dates in your renaming, as *neither* is guaranteed to have anything to do with the date you shot the image. You should be using the EXIF date.
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
05-01-2010, 08:40 AM
|
|
It's changing the "time modified" stamp? That shouldn't happen, and doesn't for me. Are you sure it isn't something else that is altering the timestamp? Are use sure you're looking at file modified" (or "file created") not "file accessed"?
Or maybe you really mean that the DNG file doesn't automatically inherit the same file timestamps as the PEF? It shouldn't - it *is* a new file. But the *image* timestamp - the one stored in the EXIF - should not be modified. Depending on what software you are using, though, it might *display* the timestamp differently for the DNG than for the PEF because the DNG version may incorporates timezone info.
|