|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
01-05-2019, 12:18 PM
|
| |
I typically like these guys but this is a bit of Pentax bashing and I suspect its partially because its become fun to spar with the fanatics who are targeting them.
I get how messing with the RAW output would really rub enthusiasts and professionals the wrong way, it definitely gets a big WTF from me. I don't like they messed with RAW, I don't want two sets of tweaked files. If it is THE reason for claiming its the second worse camera because its such an offense, they should stick to their guns and not wash it down with some BS excuse on how they made the camera worse, its just factually wrong. If you're saying RAW shouldn't be messed with - I accept that as being OBJECTIVE. To discount the extra features you do get because you're upset about it (so no I don't think you can effectively argue the image is worse) it goes beyond being SUBJECTIVE, its BS. They undermined their argument by taking the extra step in their reasoning.
Can anyone recall if they ever declared another make's iterative product "the worst" because they didn't think it was better than its predecessor for one specific reason? I know they've dogged them but have they ever singled them out like this? If not, they need to take this one back.
|
