|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-23-2018, 09:31 PM
|
| |
Yes, I do realise that. You have same thing with anything. Even for normal shooting. Closer you are the subject, thinner the focus and other way around. I’d even say that there is no reason to do longer lens with 2:1 or greater manification, because shaking will play bigger and bigger role in it. Unless you have really sturdy tripod and flashes and...but that will take away this ’hey look at that bug going there, let’s take a shot and move on ’ -thing. Sun will set before getting a shot with big rig ;)
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-23-2018, 11:54 AM
|
| |
well, that is quite special lens that canon MPE-65 and really looks like that too. I suppose that you have to get that if you are so keen of 5:1 shooting, or use wider macro and bellows or similar to get there ;) 2:1 is already quite near. with 150 mm you would have to stop it down significantly to have things in focus.
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-22-2018, 11:52 AM
|
| |
1:1 is good. dont need to be moore than that IMO
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-20-2018, 11:40 PM
|
| |
sorry, I kind a referred to ’being smaller than 150/2,8 from Sigma’. with that AF thing..
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-20-2018, 12:19 PM
|
| |
It will be big, but time will tell. no AF will help. if it is weather sealed, even better :)
---------- Post added 09-20-18 at 22:22 ----------
umm, isn’t longer focal let you be little more fruther away from subject..? dof at close up will be thin.any one who shoots 1:1 on any macro notice this. wider gives more surroundings, and narrow like this more just a bug or what ever..right?
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
09-19-2018, 10:14 AM
|
| |
It could be great option for macro. No AF really needed there.
|
