|
Forum: Lens Clubs
10-14-2016, 07:46 PM
|
| |
That's just awesome:).
It's kinda sad to see your photo's authenticity questioned when so many people think Eminem is going to send them $1mil for sharing his facebook page. Ah well, I guess it just takes a few people to raise some doubt, and skepticism can be a handy trait. I hope the publicity sent your way ends up positive!
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
10-12-2016, 08:02 PM
|
| |
"300mm plus" under common use I've seen would include 300mm, at least that's how it's used for age groups (55+ includes 55 year olds, etc). Also, Google has a page in Google+, it's not just entities strictly better than Google.
Although, there would be something special about the original post being off-topic, so I'd agree it should be strictly greater than 300mm to enable that conundrum. Not that the OP probably cares, having been gone for 5+ years (it's interesting how long this thread has been running without the OP!).
Also, I should include a photo to stay on topic, or off topic, or whatever a DA*300mm on APS-C will get me:
I can say the DA*300+k5iis handles nicely when up to my armpits in water:).
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
06-24-2016, 05:43 PM
|
| |
Thank you both!
And great call on the metallic - I think it would be suitable. I'll give it a whirl.:)
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
06-23-2016, 08:16 PM
|
| |
I'm relatively new to long lens ownership and use, I expect it will take a few years before I start to 'see' at 300mm (long for me!).
I've mostly used ultra-wides for fireflies, but the DA*300mm on a k5iis cut a nice narrow path across the field:
Fireflies by Brian Robin, on Flickr
|
