|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-04-2008, 08:23 PM
|
| |
I suppose one could Pano shifted images from a building - I see no reason why not. They should actually work better than images taken with a standard lens because of the lesser keystone distortion.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-04-2008, 08:21 PM
|
| |
Yes, thanks Mark. I was unclear. I was thinking only in terms of tile/shift on APS-C sensors.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-03-2008, 10:02 PM
|
| |
Not to mention that the two latest Nikon tilt/shift lenses are useless for landscape work, and even worse for architectural use. They are 45 and 85 mm lenses. Even on an FX camera, the field of view is way too narrow to be of any use for these two purposes. They can only be designed for use in product shooting, as far as I can guess. (Not far, by the way).
I have not seen recent releases on Canon tilt/shift lenses, but I think I remember them having some that were wider. Let's face it, 16mm is about the longest focal length for landscape and architectural images that would be of any use whatsoever on APS-C sensors, 24mm on the full 35mm image frame. A 12mm for my k10d would be even better.
|
