|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
07-08-2016, 10:21 PM
|
| |
It's not valid, because they can't create the same light condition and don't use the same lenses. They compare apple with oranges.
Imaging resource uses the same SIGMA lens with different mount for testing cameras.
DPREVIEW -
They could compare the cameras of the same brands - for example, K-1 and K-3II.
They could compare K-1 in APS-C mode with APS-C cameras of N, C and S of the same price level.
They could compare K-1 with FF cameras of the same price range.
And they should keep the same light condition, condition of test and the same DOF
Everybody know that D5 and 1Dx have better AF than K-1 without tests. It's different league and to make conclusion based on comparison with the best reportage cameras in the world is simply SILLY.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
07-08-2016, 10:52 AM
|
| |
To say honest, the tests of AF and dynamic range of DReview are absolutely unprofessional.
Some of physicists (and Falk Lumo, by the way, it seems to me) criticized the method of dynamic range testing as useless. I don't remember arguments, I'm not physicist , but the discussion could be found at forum.
|
