|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-29-2013, 05:37 PM
|
| |
Every media has its own preferences, but this consumer reports magazine behaves like totally baised-- no wonder so called traditional media will die.
You know what? this is not something new. Check the following url:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/general-talk/162311-no-love-pentax-consumer-reports.html
it is 2011, and two years after this magazine seems as biased as usual.
What I have read so far is even Pentax is far behind FF, K5 and its successors are at the top line of the APS-C DSLRs. This is based on many online media and even our CNS rivals. Canon T3? i'm not saying it's trash, but its plastic body makes it a totally entry level toy.
Lets be honest. If we took the logo off from T3 and K5 and let anyone to judge it---the answer will be obvious.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-25-2013, 04:01 PM
|
| |
Bump for your signature ;)
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-25-2013, 04:00 PM
|
| |
nice attitude, but how to act like "yo kiddo I do have a medium DSLR"? probably it is time to get a 645D bag:(
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-25-2013, 10:36 AM
|
| |
I know this is a long-term discussion. But yes, I think Pentaxians are rare.
But one fact we all need to notice is that, rare doesn't mean superior. Most of us can't afford a 645D, and lack of FF just makes us "incapable" when talking to Canikons.
Pentax did make tons nice cameras/lenses back to film era; plus the nice build and prime-lenses are the reason why I stick to it, even my loyalty is lowered after years waiting.
Cons of Pentax are just too many to say: sizes, build quality of bodies, very friendly to old PK lenses and M42s, but I really don't know how to make Canikons shut up when talking about "regula digital FF". We just don't have it.
Sigh.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
11-14-2012, 02:26 PM
|
| |
no we are not rare. But what is the word to describe rare than rare?
|
