|
Forum: Pentax K-01
05-27-2012, 06:16 PM
|
| |
When you state original - could that ever possibly mean original engine & (naturally) matching engine numbers? Even better yet - original trany, and possibly even a manual trans? Just curious. Either way it is still a great looking car.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-01
04-17-2012, 05:44 PM
|
| |
That would depend upon what you originally used the K-5 for.
Not that I've ever had any major issues with my K-01, but some would state that the autofocus isn't quite ideal for very fast moving subjects - or for subject that might be poorly lit. Although my personal perspective is that every camera out there does have it's pro's and con's - some more than others. I'll take a galnce upon your album and post an few suggestions based upon that
...Oops, just checked, your album is even better than mine - but also somehow missing
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-01
03-25-2012, 07:19 AM
|
| |
Incredible resolution; so much so that - if the ankle band had been facing the other way you proabably could read it in an on screen (monitor) image.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-01
03-20-2012, 04:34 PM
|
| |
To Mervis,
Sorry I'm not all too familiar with the versions of software that you mentioned, yet... If they were only minimally edited as you stated in your more recent posting on this thread, and not in fact done in Photoshop, then... I got to take a glance at your profile and true profession and it stated that you were not (yet) a professional photographer, but that you had sold some of your work.
As far as I can tell by your postings, perhaps some more of your work might be ready for a new sale. Also a bit of a technical note... Your posting also mentions jpegs; do you also save in raw file format or raw plus jpeg??
|
