Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 2 of 2 Search:
Forum: Pentax Q 03-12-2015, 12:39 PM  
The Future Q -- what's your take?
Posted By Tanzer
Replies: 177
Views: 22,384
Just had another thought, along the lines of the Speedbooster .... It would be kinda funny for someone to come up with a mFT or Nikon 1-mount to Q adapter. mFT and Nikon 1 bodies are kind of "selfish" in that they can use almost everyone else's lenses, but you can't put mFT or Nikon 1 lenses on any other bodies since the flange distance is so short -- but they could work on a Q!

Sony E-mount lenses wouldn't offer any advantage over Pentax APSC lenses, it would be more about bragging rights. (Take that, Sony fanboys! :p )

The mFT and Nikon 1 systems are a bit closer in terms of usual focal length, size, and weight to the Q system, so those would make a little more sense than adapting APSC lenses. It should be quite easy for Metabones and the other manufacturers to create a focal length reducer to go from mFT or Nikon 1 to the Q mount.

One problem, I suppose, is that the mFT lenses require an active electronic mount in order to power the focus-by-wire system. And one problem with the Nikon 1 system is that it doesn't have many lenses, so there wouldn't be much of an accessible market. So maybe this is a dumb idea .... Threadjack over. :(
Forum: Pentax Q 03-11-2015, 09:42 AM  
The Future Q -- what's your take?
Posted By Tanzer
Replies: 177
Views: 22,384
I think the speedbooster idea would be great. It wouldn't have to go all the way to a full 5x focal length reduction, just compensating for the APS-C to Q crop factor, or even just partially compensating, would offer existing DA/FA lens owners (not just telephoto enthusiats) a better path to the Q system. Adapted lenses are a gateway drug to native lenses, meaning that this could potentially increase overall Q lens sales, rather than compete with them. The f-stop improvement would be a boon to the Q when shooting in low light, without threatening the better image quality offered by the larger-sensor cameras.

I think the accessory grip (with or without battery) would also be great, Olympus' two-part approach would be awesome. Maybe they are afraid that this will invite someone to try to lift a DA560 by the lens mount. :eek:

I'm glad to see they introduced continuous AF in the Q-S1. The 1/1.7'" sensor is well suited for casual video. While I think it would be awesome to build it into a serious ENG video camera, maybe just some minor improvements like continuous focus assist, more modern framerates, and adding mic/headphone ports on the battery grip would be sufficient to make this an even better alternative for casual and enthusiast video use -- to replace the camcorders that Ricoh used to build. Those are things that would require a faster processor, but the processor and sensors are getting faster all the time whether anyone wants them to or not anyhow. So it wouldn't increase costs that much.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 2 of 2

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:52 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top