|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
01-10-2019, 04:25 AM
|
| |
Ricoh have of course already thrown in the towel where pr pressure is concerned. They have no advertising budget to impress with.
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
01-09-2019, 04:10 AM
|
| |
Purely my subjective feeling about what I find acceptable noise in general. Of course it highly depends on lighting conditions. In good lighting high ISO is more usable, but that is only useful when you need high shutter speeds or small apertures. Otherwise you might as well use a lower ISO, because it will look even better. ISO 819200 on the K-1 II is a joke, but if it means my ISO 6400 shots would look better it is OK with me. But as I said I do not think the K-1 II profits a lot from nr at the lower ISO I tend to use like it is the case for the K70 and KP. It will start to be more useful on higher megapixel full frame sensors for me because it's effect will be noticeable more at lower iso.
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
01-08-2019, 04:33 PM
|
| |
That is not what I meant. I think High iso above 12800 just isn't good enough. With or without NR.
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
01-08-2019, 04:33 AM
|
| |
I think the noise cancelling chip doesn't do much for the K-1 II It's effect is only really visible on iso's above 12800 on normal viewing distances. You don't really want to go there anyway. Effects on the smaller 24mp aps-c sensor pixels is much greater at lower iso's so it is a good addition for those camera's. When a future full frame would have a 54mp sensor the noise cancelling chip would make more sense. So it enables the camera to have more megapixels. IBIS will have to be improved as well because smaller pixels need more accurate sr.
|
|
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors
12-24-2018, 03:45 AM
|
| |
dpreview likes trolling Pentaxians
|
