|
Forum: Pentax Q
10-30-2012, 06:31 PM
|
| |
Cool, I'd like to see 'em, also. Look forward to it.
|
|
Forum: Pentax Q
10-28-2012, 06:27 PM
|
| |
Barondla, I like peaking on the K-01, what about the Q do you find better? Just curious--I have no Q peaking experience yet.
Monki--post an image from the D mount. I love vignetting...
|
|
Forum: Pentax Q
10-28-2012, 01:15 PM
|
| |
Nice shots!! I particularly like the colors in the first two.
I'd normally spring for one of these, as I love fast glass and the Q has so little to offer at this time, but 25mm (~135mm effective) is just a bit long for me. I have a 135/4.5 Hektor for my Leica M3, and I've enjoyed it when I use it, but the opportunities just aren't that frequent for me. For something like shooting my daughter it might be nice, although I'm more of a 90mm portrait shooter... And I think I'd have to stop it down to 2.8 or so, anyway, to get acceptably sharp shots with the amount she moves (I swear she is a vibrating atom...).
And because of that I keep thinking the new Q tele zoom is likely a better option for me. With the money left over, I could buy a kern paillard 25/1.4 if I really wanted to.
What I REALLY want is a 28mm (effective) prime... I'm more of a wide guy. 28 and 50 with an occasional 90 and even more occasional 21.
I don't know, I keep pondering this lens but never pull the trigger. Thanks for posting, I guess I better make my mind up now, rather than later.
|
