|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
02-18-2016, 03:53 PM
|
| |
I suppose we don't know, but our assumption has been a tweaked version of the D810 Sony sensor, with Pentax engineers applying their known special techniques to wring more out of it.
I haven't seen a contrary opinion in print yet - will you post a link?
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
02-18-2016, 10:15 AM
|
| |
The K-1 isn't 'aimed at' anything. Ricoh gave the K-1 a unique combination of (comparative) strengths and (comparative) weaknesses. If I were forced to choose between two cameras I'd compare and contrast D810, but that's because I want final IQ. I don't give a fig about frame rate or video.
K-mount with IMX-094 trumps every other feature.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
02-18-2016, 10:08 AM
|
| |
I shoot a lot more film cameras than digital, because film is my fun. An MX is smaller than I like, but I have a pristine black one because that is my fun. I don't denigrate the entire MX because it isn't perfect for my grip like a KX and I don't denigrate the K-3 because my pinky finger ends up on the base.
I just shoot what I like and let everyone else like what they shoot.
|
