|
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands
11-01-2018, 09:04 AM
|
| |
I don't think that's what we'red discussing... but this from the OP:
Even at base ISO, I can't see the smaller format accomplishing that, or even surpassing the stills from the XT-2...
I quite like the images I see from the newer M43 cameras, I'm sure it's enough to satisfy most people's needs... even if it doesn't "surpass" the current APS-C offerings.
New cameras now are kind of like having a supercharged V12 engined car for our daily commutes. They all pretty much do more than we need...
|
|
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands
10-31-2018, 10:36 AM
|
| |
For lower ISOs, M4/3 surpasses APS/C cameras from only a few years ago, especially after the 20MP sensor came out. It's a great sensor but still can't touch the sensor on an A6500 or Pentax KP, for eample. Or the Fuji XT-2 - let alone the XT-3. For high ISOs, it's clearly better than APS-C cameras such as the K20D or K7, but still getting to the level of cameras such as the K-x from 2009. They might surpass that with the latest release but probably can't touch the K-5 (2010). So as far as high ISO performance or even stills I really doubt it can touch the X-T3, because as it has been said, there's no replacement for displacement. The APS-C sensor is 64.4% larger than the M4/3 sensor in terms of area coverage.
 |
