|
Forum: Lens Clubs
02-19-2016, 09:03 AM
|
| |
Firstly, please accept my sincere apologies on the "lazy" comment. I am nearly a couch potato from what you have stated. Don't take it personally it was purely out of ignorance.
Besides that I don't have a K-3ii and may be that comment was inept on my part. I am way more excited and inclined to use the PS whenever I can and I instantly imagined what a shot like this would turn out with PS. I am not aware of the "artifacts thing" though and my assumption was that it will be more of a blur for the movement part vs some undesired artifact in the picture. Please enlighten.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
02-19-2016, 06:09 AM
|
| |
Is that what we call pixie dust.
---------- Post added 02-19-16 at 08:15 AM ----------
Agree.
Agree and exactly my point because that movement will get a beautiful blur (much desired for a water fall shot) but showing a lot more texture in the surrounding rocks. A shot as such will be worth printing.
You could have worked with the floor rock or a tree branch if the view was obstructed. Not having a tripod and hence not being able to use pixel shift despite owning a K-3ii is.. well... lazy (no offense meant). It is a superb handheld shot.
May be I should have asked if you took a pixel shifted image for this composition? in the first place. My bad.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
02-18-2016, 08:40 PM
|
| |
Would it be reasonable to ask a pixel shift image of this waterfall?
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
10-22-2015, 11:07 AM
|
| |
Surprisingly I see very little PF on the images. 16-50 shows rampant PF on high contrast scenes and I am sure it would show up on some of your shots if used. The 24-70 seems a lot more tolerant.
|
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
10-22-2015, 07:24 AM
|
| |
This one looks reasonably sharp at 70/2.8. Usually lenses are least sharp at maximum aperture at the full zoom length. But this does not look like the case. That would also mean at other focal lengths its going to be only better. The bokeh is good too. (a tad bit harsh for my taste if you will). The focus/zoom rings confusion is going to make me mad if the 70-200 does not follow the suite. Cos 24-70 and 70-200 are the mostly the bread and butter of pro photographers and having the zoom/focus rings differently placed on these 2 is going to be a bummer. Does anyone know or have used the 70-200 and and know if the zoom ring is aligned with this 24-70?
|
