Forum: Lens Clubs
07-06-2008, 02:50 PM
|
|
The Exif data is wrong. They just happen to have the same ID as the Pentax lenses I am sure.
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
07-06-2008, 09:52 AM
|
|
Well, Meyer lenses are quite common among the lens addicts. Although, I guess they are more known as the Pentacon lenses that they made later on. Alot of the Meyers are good quality glass, but they also have some really crap ones, especially in buildquality. Schneider is excellent, but quite rare and hard to get by in M42 mount. I got a 135mm and it is a marverlous piece of glass.
I actually got that lens with a Spotmatic I bought, I didnt even notice it in the auction and it was unusued for a few weeks, until I one day was bored. But I must say it really surprised me. It is infact really sharp, even wideopen.
This shot of my daughter was captured with lens wideopen
The two shots earlier in the thread was also shot wideopen and are unedited RAW straight from camera. You can see more pictures (and bigger sizes) from both the Schneider and Chinonflex at my test gallery here Zewrak |
Forum: Lens Clubs
07-06-2008, 08:48 AM
|
|
And most of them with average to crap quality!
;)
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
07-06-2008, 01:52 AM
|
|
Chinonflex Auto Reflex 100mm f/2.8
Schneider-Kreuznach Edixa-Tele-Xenar 135mm f/3.5 |