|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-25-2017, 02:29 AM
|
| |
Sorry, there is no cooperation / adding up / Anti-Shake between Olympus glass and Lumix bodies, and vice versa ...
Even the Olympus 12-100 / 4 which has its own SR does not add up to the GH5 Shake Reduction (towards SR inside the Oly body it does of course)
Olympus MFT lenses have a much better manual focus but that's all ... Zooming is impossible cause they all loose focus on their march
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-24-2017, 08:14 PM
|
| |
@richandfleur ... Tell us more and show it please.
What camera, what footage, what mistakes and errors...
Problem with Pentaxists is they live in dreams of any future to come true.
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-07-2017, 07:59 AM
|
| |
... but very easy to understand the technics, if you are willing and able.
For consumers the industry may have even supported such film-like mind-projections that seem to work for them
But they are nevertheless untrue and unimportant just as how many ISO you can have. (Pentax KP)
or how many pixels you get on your newest sensor ... It's good for selling - but bad for objective sensemaking truth.
Btw:
Pentax has tried that idiotic selling-game with high numbers, new shapes, designes and colours ... ad nauseam ...
much more than about prosumercams by Canon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus or Nikon - who care more about quality and what their users want.
Pentax sadly underrates their poor fans, or looses the more sophisticated ones for many years now (on the video field)
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-07-2017, 04:19 AM
|
| |
Excuses are accepted ;-) ... Work-in-progress-video-tests are good for learning ...
But this 24-film-look - very often re-generated fake-news-believe - is just an illusion ... kadajawi:
I am shure you cannot make out any difference between 24 or 25 pictures. Anything you see there is a dream - trust me ;-) Amen !
I filmed with 16 pics on 8mm first (Daddy's Bolex) That was smooth enough, but while panning you had to be carefully slow, of course.
Later on we celebrated "fast" 18 pictures in Super 8mm. All the time we had 24p on 16mm or higher for movies.
I could choose 24p on my Super 8 as well, but for saving the money I only used it rarely for a more secure playback later on.
For slow-motion I had my 54 pictures / second.... That was my Nizo:
https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/nizo-s56-super-8-camera/663367272-245-5566
50 double half-pictures (50i - Pal) came with television ... and this derived from European AC of 50 Hertz (frequency per second)
American NTSC used 60i for broadcasting.
The shutter-speed should not be higher than 100 or 120/s ... or you will have to much of those non-flowing staccato/jerky/chopped images.
Best shutterspeed is 50 or 60 cause the motion-blur makes film-video smooth and gentle ~ ~ ~
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-04-2017, 07:37 PM
|
| |
Yes, I also got two of those push-zooms from Pentax ...
One Takumar f:4.5 and one Pentax A f:4 - both around 70-200
Nice to try them, but like many old glasses they produce purple, green fringing at the edges in contrast-situations...
You Tube
|
src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hD93OLZSrTA?controls=1" allowfullscreen>
|
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-04-2017, 05:14 PM
|
| |
But this doesn't look good to me ... Am I wrong eventually, or is something wrong with my pc ... ?
Sorry, I really don't want to hurt you !
Terrible AF ... and abruptly shaking jumping picture frame... shutter speed to high as well ...
Why you choose 24p btw ? It makes no sense to me really. I never understood why people think or hope
that 24p looks filmy - it is just the same frame rate of movies, that's all. Isn't it ?
Film-Look only means High DOF - certain colour-characteristic ... rich contrast possible ... and grainy, if sensitive material
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-04-2017, 02:46 PM
|
| |
Yes PiDicus Rex ... I saw that video from Fotodiox ... and was surprised
1. My remembrance made me believe APS-C is not compatible with MFT - That must have been "fake news" ;-)
Now - yes I still have the Tamron here - I think that these 17-50 will change to a slightly more Tele-mode then. Am I right ?
2. Nice to see the ND-filter hides inside - it will also be a little cheaper now - but for a change the whole lense has to be taken down.
Well, OK, screwing off the filter is not so much less an effort ... Btw. I still have 2 x ND Filter: Hoya Pro Digital (NDX 4 + NDX 16)
Memo: I stopped filming when a company for blue light news (police, accidents , etc) told me my footage is to unstable for tv,
the image was stuttering ... This ended my enthusiasm for ever to shoot videos with my K5. Much, much later on - in fact just
a few weeks ago I suddenly realized what they meant with this negative comment. They must have been disgusted by the
shutter-effect (automatic shutter only on the K5)
I had foolishly completely misinterpreted that statement by thinking it was the 25p and awaited for a camera with 50p from now on
which doesnt stutter and still has a strong codec recording with that frame-rate. I neglected the K5 completely then because it was
even abandoned for such junky boulevardt needs.
I gave up my professional video-interest for almost three years now. Time to dream more realistically again !
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
07-04-2017, 11:33 AM
|
| |
My K7 and K5 were overheating quickly ... At least that warning popped up.
I feared more noise to come and let it cool down first - till the warning faded away.
Why am I here now again ?
The varifocal glass for MFT can't zoon in motion - it gets out of focus inbetween.
Looking back at my K5 with Tamrom 17-50/2.8 zooming was possible while in motion.
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
06-27-2017, 10:10 PM
|
| |
So still with that ugly electronic SR and heating up of the sensor when on videorecording ?
|
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
06-27-2017, 07:56 AM
|
| |
I am on the jump for a GH5 these days - but I am not clear about glasses yet.
Parfocal zooms are not available for MFT - to bad ... (no speedbooster- and cinelense-infos please)
But Olympus has a better manual focus than Lumix and Leica. (Oly 12-40 / 2.8 and 12-100 / 4.0)
Sorry: While zooming they loos focus-point inbetween - No way !
Tried them today at the shop.
Seller also told me there is a new Pentax - I just tried it shortly ...
Don't believe Pentax has gained much on video-field ... True ?
No News here as well ...
Say it different if you can and want ... please.
|
