|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
09-27-2018, 05:26 AM
|
| |
You should ;)
In practice so many variables influence this that I wouldn't worry about it.
The K-1 is so good to begin with, I wouldn't have expected revolutions there.
Sometimes that's a 50% improvement. A half-second is an eternity for some subjects.
Depends on the lens and shooting scenario. The takeaway is taht the MK2 is always better, sometimes more sometimes less, but better.
The takeaway is that the improvements are consistent in a variety of scenarios.
Fair enough. Many people do.
Who really shoots at ISO 204800 anyway? The two cameras are similar below 6400, the MK2 is better until about 102400, then it's not as clear-cut.
The MK2 is an all-around improvement. Not an all-around revolution. That would have been too much to expect using the same sensor and body. People who have done the upgrade are all happy with it.
|
