|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
04-16-2018, 03:46 PM
|
| |
The f numbers you are showing are the lens value not the actual f number - correct? Meaning with the 1.4x when the lens reads f/5.6 the actual f stop is f/8, etc.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-09-2017, 10:24 AM
|
| |
Does the K5 have a magnified live view option? I don't think it does - that may help. I'm interested in this topic as it shows that in the baseline practical use the operator makes more difference perhaps than the device.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-01-2017, 06:18 PM
|
| |
Very impressive results. Great effort and write up.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-30-2017, 02:43 PM
|
| |
Is it possible that there is a difference in the focus point or is that already verified to be accurate. This is a stunning result. Lovely detail with the APO converter.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
12-12-2015, 08:15 AM
|
| |
I too have shot the FA* 80-200 f/2.8 in what I thought were torture conditions and gotten no CA/PF. I shot it against my DA* 200 f/2.8 and the DA* showed CA/PF but not the FA*; I no longer have the FA* since I sold it but that experience was an eye opener to me. I wonder if the FA* that was reviewed was typical or not.
As for TC's - I would love to see the Pentax HD AW 1.4x in this testing mix.
I need to do some tests myself. I have the FA* 300 f/4.5 and the Pentax A series 1.4x as well as the HD 1.4x - the HD is on loan to my dad at the moment however.
|
