|
Forum: Photographic Technique
05-13-2019, 12:00 PM
|
| |
I would say the opposite, a 6 stop in normal daylight isn't going to result in that long of an exposure and the lack of movement of the slower river (compared to the falls themselves) in the first image would go with that, and the sky seems crisper.
I prefer the more blurred version of the river in the 2nd to match up with the movement of the falls, though there seems to be a repeating stuttered pattern that bothers me a bit, presumably from the 3 second delay between images if this is indeed the composite one.
If I'm right I think I would prefer a longer pure ND shot when there is relatively slow moving water involved.
ND, 1st image
Composite, 2nd.
|
