|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
03-26-2015, 09:45 AM
|
| |
That makes sense.
---------- Post added 03-26-15 at 09:46 AM ----------
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
03-26-2015, 09:26 AM
|
| |
*I believe you meant customer?
You're right and that's what's worrying me...
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
03-26-2015, 08:25 AM
|
| |
That space is indeed the client's firm name.
---------- Post added 03-26-15 at 08:29 AM ----------
Thank you.
In that case, I really don't understand why the inclusion of that clause... I have emailed them to inquire...
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
03-26-2015, 07:09 AM
|
| |
So, can I even use them for my portfolio?
|
|
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals
03-26-2015, 06:36 AM
|
| |
"...The Photographer understands that "......" has the moral right to be identified as the author of the photographs when copies of the photographs are presented to the public, and shall communicate this understanding to publishers, designers and other third parties."
I just got a contract for a shoot I'm supposed to do this coming Saturday (I'm asking for some help, please visit https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/125-flashes-lighting-studio/291615-cry-help.html), but this clause is making me rethink... So this means they are the author of the images? So where am I in all this? I'm not sure I'm reading it right, as english isn't my first language...
Any thoughts? Should I ask them to remove the clause?
Thank you in advance.
Paul
|
