|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-31-2016, 11:31 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-31-2016, 10:42 AM
|
| |
It'd be cool if Ricoh put out a k3s, no flash, no gps and slightly smaller/lighter body and cheaper price point. I'd buy the heck out of that as a second camera body. Maybe no SR too.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-31-2016, 07:26 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-30-2016, 01:18 PM
|
| |
Ideally nothing, would make for a lighter body. That said, the gps is pretty neat.
(I would much prefer to be forced to use my real flashes too.)
I've always wanted a k1000 digital equiv, where the body has no features (no video, SR, etc), but I'll never see it.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-30-2016, 12:29 PM
|
| |
I just like to stand up for the "no flash" option. There are a lot of vocal people on the other side, I just wanted to provide my opinion.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II
03-30-2016, 10:14 AM
|
| |
I also wouldn't miss onboard flash. I prefer bodies that don't have onboard flash.
|
