Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
05-11-2018, 11:50 AM
|
|
So...where's the issue in the bokeh in the images I posted?
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
05-11-2018, 08:55 AM
|
|
OK. Still not surprised; YMMV.
All at 800ISO. Leaves outside, and they moved between frames; they're outside a window BTW. All processed through PDCU 5.8.1, shot in DNG. Cropped to just show the bokeh. One was processed with motion control on in PDCU.
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
05-10-2018, 03:58 PM
|
|
I've got one of those...but wasn't surprised. What should I have seen? (It's on my desktop right now, so gimme a hint.)
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
05-10-2018, 06:59 AM
|
|
Geez dude...just came dangerously close to a spit-take on reading that, with said K-cup beverage just having been imported into my mouth. :lol:
But I disagree...it seems to work better in post-processing as a plugin while I wait for Lr, etc to do its thing.
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
05-07-2018, 04:55 PM
|
|
I appreciate some of the reviewers' concerns, but frankly in the real world the other variables just seem to overwhelm some of those. Like the obvious differences in the lenses; they outstrip whatever the NR is doing in DPR's test scene. Even in just that scene I see sections I like better with either the K-1 or K-1ii depending on what bit I'm looking at, whether it's on the edge, etc. TL;DR: I just can't care about differences that small since they almost never will affect any images I want to make.
That being said, I guess reviewers have to talk about something, and camera makers' hype invites stuff like Where's Waldo hunts through handheld PS images for defects. And yeah, if I did action or video I'd prefer a Nikon or Sony. Perhaps these cameras are all so good there isn't much point to sweating the smaller details, esp since one has alternatives, even within the same brand.
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
04-30-2018, 06:01 PM
|
|
Not really off-topic: that makes you the de-noise reduction engine of the forum. Keeping signal high and all that. Cheers!
|