Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4 Search:
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 10-14-2017, 12:46 AM  
DXO mark tests the Pentax K-1
Posted By Class A
Replies: 141
Views: 18,431
As usual, these days, DPReview just regurgitated news from somebody else.

The original news came from PetaPixel.

Hot on the heels of the anomaly (almost two years after it happened...), DPReview now started their own "investigation" by contacting DxO. It would be funny, if it weren't so sad.

The actual explanation by DxO ("too busy to finish the review") is a joke and a half as well. They could have told us that a long time ago. Trust DPReview to take the statement at face value and argue the explanation dispels any conspiracy theories. Oh, boy...
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 09-18-2016, 11:14 PM  
DXO mark tests the Pentax K-1
Posted By Class A
Replies: 141
Views: 18,431
He said much more than that.

He said that their methodology is broken because the light source they are using lacks power in the blue part of the spectrum and that that's the reason why their resolution figures are bogus.

Changing from halogen light (or even incandescent light) to sunlight does not provide a 10MP vs 100MP difference as he suggested.
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 09-18-2016, 08:06 AM  
DXO mark tests the Pentax K-1
Posted By Class A
Replies: 141
Views: 18,431
Was it perhaps this sentence from the description of colour sensitivity measurements:
"Typically, with a tungsten illuminant, the blue sensitivity is very low, due to the weak sensitivity of silicon in short wavelengths and the lack of short wavelengths in tungsten light."
?

That sentence just states a fact, as opposed to describing their process.


I cannot confirm that and unless you can backup your serious allegation (use a wayback archive or similar) I will regard your statement as a baseless contention.

We may not agree with DxOMark's idea of a single score for a complex performance (a questionable practice for sure) and/or the weightings that DxOMark uses to obtain that single number, but you surely cannot accuse them of not knowing what they are doing, or using inadequate procedures.

DxOMark's procedures are well thought out and there is no better alternative anyhow. To preempt your counterargument: No, (unscaled) test shots under varying conditions with undefined focus targets are not a substitute.
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 09-18-2016, 02:07 AM  
DXO mark tests the Pentax K-1
Posted By Class A
Replies: 141
Views: 18,431
Where did you read that?

From the DxOMark page on their lens measurements:
"The target is uniformly illuminated with halogen lights filtered to get a daylight color temperature of 5500K."
.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top