Forum: Lens Clubs
10-23-2009, 07:09 AM
|
|
Here are a couple of mine shot with the 35mm that got into the Pentax Photo Gallery.
These don't really show the true nature of this lens but they do serve as proof that this lens is great for landscape too. I just love it and it's just the right focal length on a crop to cover those shots where the 12-24mm is too wide and the 50mm is too narrow.
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
10-22-2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
@amaurosis
Does it really matter? It's always the photographer, not the camera. :)
But if you must know, the EXIF comes in handy:
Camera Make: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K-7
Image Date: 2009:08:09 12:15:44
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 35.0mm (35mm equivalent: 52mm)
Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
Aperture: f/4.5
ISO equiv: 200
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
Photographer: Villlamin
Copyright: Villamin
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
05-30-2009, 10:12 AM
|
|
Maybe the Canon 35mm f/2 (~$200) and 35mm f/1.4 (~$900). I don't know about Nikon and other brands.
|
Forum: Lens Clubs
09-01-2008, 05:15 PM
|
|
Well, here are a couple of my shots with the 35mm f/2.8 macro at a Pentax get together here in Slovenia a while ago.
Shots taken April 23rd 2008, default in camera settings JPG, no post processing other than resize: http://www.fejker.net/Pentax/IMGP3318.JPG http://www.fejker.net/Pentax/IMGP3313.JPG http://www.fejker.net/Pentax/IMGP3312.JPG
I'm getting the lens this month (when I get paid) and I think it will be a great lens for "different kind of" portrait shots and stitched landscape panoramas with my K10D (I use the DA12-24 extensively for that ATM).
This is not a usual macro lens but I think some people here are mistaking macro for bug shooting - there is so much more than bugs and flowers in that word. And the thing with this lens is that you're not limited when composing a shot because you can get as close to the subject as you want. I simply loved it when I tried it.
|