Author: | | New Member Registered: March, 2020 Location: China Posts: 22 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: September 12, 2020 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | good image quality | Cons: | only manual focus as A series | | I set a transmitting resolution-test-card in about 8 meter away.
but chopping the object to the same size. you can clearly see the converter helps a lot.
Pentax K5ii
DA*300 @F5.6
tripod+mirror lockup
1/1600 sec iso 800 with the converter
1/1000 sec iso 100 without the converter
the stars was taken with DA300 + Rear Converter-A 2x-S aperture full open | | | | | Site Supporter Registered: July, 2020 Posts: 131 | Review Date: September 5, 2020 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | good optics; easy to use with all Pentax lenses; aperture priority works well | Cons: | optics aren't as sharp as I'd like | | I've had this converter a very long time, perhaps 25-30 years (bought it new, but I have no idea what I paid for it). It is my first- or second-most-used lens (out of about 20 total), as it gets put frequently on anything longer than about 50mm in my arsenal -- especially on lens > 80 mm focal length. The optics aren't as top-rate as I'd like, but if you use lenses that are top-rate in terms of sharpness, you get pretty good results with this converter. I've not used it on my Pentax 400-mm f/5.6 and 500-mm f/4.5 lenses, but I've used it on everything else from 300mm downward, and it's an invaluable tool for me. Fast, sharp lenses help get the most out of this converter. Now, my 200-mm f/2.5 smc lens with this converter is not nearly as sharp as my smc-A 400-mm f/5.6 lens is alone, but the converter gives me the flexibility of having two focal lengths in a single lens, which comes in handy especially when travelling. I'll bring my 135-mm f/2.5 Takumar, for example, and throw this converter on it and have "also" a 270-mm f/5 lens with me without much extra weight. Or my Sigma 105-mm f/2.8 EX Macro lens, which becomes 210-mm f/5.6 with this converter while remaining lighter and less space-consuming in my bag that my 200-mm f/2.5 or my 70-210mm f/2.8 lenses. I would rate the optics about a "7", but the only rating option for this review is "overall", and for that I give it a "9" simply because of its utility to me, and the optics are certainly decent. Because of the good design, it fits on all my K-mount lenses (not all rear converters do).
This converter works well with my A* 200-mm f/2.8 and A* 300-mm f/4 lenses on tripods, and the aperture priority function works perfectly when the lens aperture setting is set to "A". I have also done some testing with my Pentax Rear Converter-K T6-2X in comparison, and the optical quality seems fairly close -- hard to distinguish between the two. (Of course, the K T6-2X does not offer aperture priority, but it's a little smaller and lighter than the A 2X-S.)
I see that Ricoh still lists this converter in production, but I can find it new only via Japan for around $550; if the optics were better, I'd not hesitate to pay that price for a new one, to have a second one on hand, as I use this converter so very much. I think that $550 is way-overpriced for this, due to the optics. I've always wanted a good second one of these and keep looking on Ebay for a good second-hand one.
| | | | New Member Registered: April, 2017 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 15 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: July 9, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $35.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | It WORKS! Well! | Cons: | 2 stops darker (just physics) | | I just have to concur with the Mr. Stone review about how well this works with "fast glass". I acquired this (mint condition) telecon from auctionsite for about $35 on a "whim", thinking I might, when needing to travel very light, leave a big lens at home and just double a shorter one. I have a couple very sharp longish lenses - a Rokinon 135mm f2, which is just "astoundingly sharp" on its own (by far, sharpest lens I own, based upon my own testing). And a DFA100 f2.8 macro, which is also very sharp, but not like the Roki. To me the acid test of a teleconverter is "does it resolve more than just zoomed in crop"? So I CAREFULLY (tripod, electronic shutter, pixelshift) shot a couple scenes with the Roki and then the Pentax 100mm macro. For the prime alone, I used a "sharpest possible mid-range aperature (like f8). For the 2X telecon, I opened up to about f4 so as to be "realistic" to field use where shutter speed needs to be kept reasonable. So technically this puts my "with teleconverter" shots at a disadvantage. But in both cases, the level of details resolved with the 2X in place is just "dramatically" improved. See attached image files (zoomed way in to same DISPLAYED SIZE for object in center frame - well beyond 100% to show more clearly). I also did a test with the DA*300mm f4 shooting the first quarter moon. Once again, even with this long (and also superbly sharp) prime lens, the 2X dramatically increased the captured resolution of craters. Wow. Talk about $35 well spent!!!
Rokinon 135 Without:
Rokinon 135 With 2X teleconverter:
DFA100 macro Without:
DFA100 macro With telecon:
DA300 without:
DA300 with: | | | | Loyal Site Supportaxian Registered: September, 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 503 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 29, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $90.00
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | Well matched to A series. Works with fast lenses. | Cons: | May not match well with all lenses. Does not transmit focal length and MTF information from lens to camera | | My experience matches the fine review written by Stone G. Please see his review for most of the details you will need to know.
I'll try to add some additional unique points.
- It appears the formula really is specific to some lenses. It does a great job with some, but matches poorly with others. Atrocious on the da 60-250.
- This is the only TC I've ever tried that copes well with very fast lenses. It, along with the Rear Converter-A 1.4x-S are excellent matches at low F and Full frame for the SMC Pentax-A* 135mm F1.8
- It also matches very well with the SMC Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 Macro.
I do lament that it doesn't transmit data from lens to camera. It's such a pleasure to use the SMC Pentax-F 1.7x AF Adapter because not only does it pass the data, but it also automatically converts the values to be correct with the TC applied. I miss that every time I use this. HOWEVER, this one has better image quality, so sometimes that wins the day and I use this instead.
- When compared to the Rear Converter-A 1.4x-S , the 2x has less contrast and is slightly less sharp. That's relative, though. This TC (for lenses which is matches well with) is a strong performer. The difference between this and a generic TC is like night and day.
| | | | | Site Supporter Registered: March, 2010 Location: Frankfurt am Main Posts: 1,241 | Review Date: March 5, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $60.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Optical Quality | Cons: | Nothing yet | | I just got a used one in very good condition for GBP 36 from eBay.
It should replace my Kenko 2X KAX Teleplus MC7, which once replaced my Vivitar 2X-22.
The Kenko has already been a very big improvement in resolution and contrast (and offered the "A" contacts).
According to reviews in this forum and other places, the A 2X-S will be even better (and it is shorter by 1.5mm). With 7 elements, just the SMC coating may help.
After some usage, I may write a real review.
Just for now, I think I should mention that the manual lists the following lenses as incompatible:
Reason: coupling not possible - K 3.5/15
- A 3.5/15
- M 3.5/24-35
Reason: strong vignetting - Many tele lenses longer than 300mm.
As the manual seems to be from the eighties, there may be more incompatibilities with newer lenses.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: June, 2010 Location: North Zealand, Denmark Posts: 1,516 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: September 13, 2013 | Recommended | Price: $121.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Optical and mechanical quality | Cons: | A bit expensive - otherwise none | | There are teleconverters and then there are matching teleconverters. I bought my A 2X-S with the specific hope that it would work on my smc DA* 200mm f/2.8 lens because optically it is an FA-design from 1993 and the Pentax product litterature indicates that this rear converter should work on this type of lens (Pentax telephoto lens up to 300mm F.L.).
I have tested it extensively on my DA* 200 and I have not been dissapointed.
Of course, any teleconverter will be an add-on to a carefully optimized (one should hope) lens design and introduce some limitations such as lowering the fully open aperture f-ratio,and any (quality) teleconverter will magnify aberrations of the lens that it is sitting upon. But that's not the point. The point is: Does it work as a quality converter should work on a quality lens?
And it does. I have a hard time seeing the IQ degradation mentioned by others. What I do find, is that this TC unquestionably does help when a quality lens like the DA* 200 outresolves the sensor (the sensor under-samples the image produced by the lens). Images may sometimes at a casual glance look "sharper" without TC, but I have found that to be a matter of under-sampling and pixelation, as the following 100% comparison crops will hopefully demonstrate:
Downsized (approx. 30%) crops: The softness observed at f/2.8 is no worse that what the lens itself without TC would show.
Test Target: Remote building. I am aiming at the guarding rails in front of the windows.
100% non-resized crops of images with and without Rear Converter A 2X-S. Note the bars of the railings.
Starlings on a powerline. Again 100% non-resized crops. Note the speckles on the birds' chests.
And finally the infinitely remote.100% non-resized crops of single, non-postprocessed images. Look for the tiniest craters resolved in the two images.
Be it tiny craterlets on the Moon, speckle's on the starling's chests, bars in the garding rails on a remotine building: With this TC I can capture detail that lens and sensor alone cannot resolve. Add to that the splendid manufacturing quality and I can only recommend this converter - if used with the right matching lenses and if you know what to expect and not to expect from a quality teleconverter.
| | | | New Member Registered: July, 2012 Posts: 6 | Review Date: September 16, 2012 | Not Recommended | Price: $125.00
| Rating: 6 |
Pros: | Not much vignating | Cons: | no transmission of lens data, serious loss of IQ | | Purchased a used one thinking from Pentax this will be better than any other manufacturer. Even though used, this looked like new. Too much loss of light (more than 2 stops) and due to lack of any communication with lens, need to adjust fl in camera for each shot.
Can be used only when the target is static and you get time to adjust and focus everything
Could use only for moon shots
Loss of IQ was surprisingly very high unlike what others have reported here. on Tripod with MLU also the IQ was poor than handheld for the same shot
| | | | PEG Moderator Registered: August, 2008 Location: Highlands of Scotland... "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" - William Blake Posts: 57,760 | Review Date: July 2, 2010 | Recommended
| Rating: N/A |
Pros: | Good quality | Cons: | None, that I've found | | Seldom used, but can get you out of a fix when you need extra reach that you hadn't planned for or has been imposed on you, eg sound board instead of pit for example at music venue.
Yes two stop light loss, but when used with fast ish lenses not such a great issue, ideal to be kept in bag for emergencies.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: January, 2010 Location: Murcia, Spain Posts: 100 | Review Date: February 4, 2010 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Excellent results. Works with all lenses. Focus trapping works with K10D. You can introduce effective focal lenght for shake reduction. | Cons: | Non. | | At least my copy is sharper then the Kenko pz-af 1.5x SHQ. Evidently it is not easy to achieve pefect focus with a focal lenght of 600, and maybe some critical reports in this thread are because of this. Tripod should be used, and multiple shots, varying focus slightly (and cable release, mirror lockup…*up to 1/100s). I hadly find any image degradation on well focussed shots.
Regards - Klaus
| | | | Senior Member Registered: March, 2007 Location: Slovenia Posts: 140 | Review Date: October 16, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $125.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Price, build quality, image quality | Cons: | none | | I bought this converter to acompany my Takumar 300/4 because I sometimes need that extra reach photographing wildlife. I find it really versatile to have converter in my backpack instead of carrying two big lenses with me (300mm and 600mm resp.) I have used it now for a couple of months and am quite pleased with it. Best image quality is of course achieved using a good, sturdy tripod and remote trigger. Hadheld is also possible, because of quite good SR system in my K100D, but, I prefer to use tripod or monopod.
In a combination with my Takumar 300/4 wide opened, some PF can be seen, but used with other lenses (mainly with DA 18-55 and K 50/1,7), PF is not visible.
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: April, 2007 Location: Idaho,USA Posts: 1,619 | Review Date: October 1, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $150.00
| Rating: 7 |
| I just want to confirm this converter works well with the DA* 300/4, manual focus of course.
When I first got it and used it I thought it was very soft but found out it isn't too bad but I HAVE to work with it on a tripod and use MLU for decent results. I have taken some pretty cool pictures of the moon using it with the DA* 300/4.
It's very well made.
Again, you can obtain decent results with this, especially for a 2X converter but be prepared for careful work.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: September, 2008 Location: Norway Posts: 127 | Review Date: September 15, 2008 | Recommended | Price: $87.00
| Rating: 5 |
Pros: | original product, probably better than 3rd party | Cons: | loss of image quality, manual focus only | | Bought this (secondhand) mainly because it had a reasonable price tag, and my LBA needed a quick fix. It looked like it was brand new.
It's rarely, if ever used. I've tried it in different situations on different lenses, but have never really been too happy with the results. I don't think it's bad in any way, but it gives softer images than I would like to have.
As many others will tell you, a 2x teleconverter will steal a lot of light (2 stops) and degrade the image quality quite a bit. I have not tried it side by side with other 2x teleconverters, but I guess this is one of the better you can get hold of. For me this converter seems to be less useful on a modern digital slr (K20D) where you can do a 2x crop instead without loosing any sharpness. When comparing a crop vs teleconverter I prefer the cropped image.
It's now hiding in my closet until one day when I get the hold of a reasonably priced 300mm f2.8 where it might give a better impression. When (or if) I do I'll update this review
BTW. Although it is now a discontinued product, the 2X-S is still listed at the local distributor (in Norway). It's now priced at 4495 NOK including 25% VAT, currently about 780 USD. That is just crazy, there is no other word for it | | |