Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Pentax Lens Review Database » Digital Era Pentax K-Mount Lenses » DA Zoom Lenses
SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF] Review RSS Feed

SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]

Sharpness 
 8.5
Aberrations 
 7.8
Bokeh 
 7.6
Autofocus 
 8.0
Handling 
 8.3
Value 
 9.2
Reviews Views Date of last review
50 256,463 Mon November 1, 2021
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
96% of reviewers $415.66 8.58
SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]

SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]
supersize
SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]
supersize

Description:
Released in late 2007, the SMC Pentax-DA 18-250 mm lens is based on a Tamron 18-250 mm lens.

It was discontinued in 2011 and replaced by the SMC Pentax-DA 18-270mm lens in 2012.

SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL[IF]
© www.pentaxforums.com, sharable with attribution
Image Format
APS-C
Lens Mount
Pentax K
Aperture Ring
No
Diaphragm
Automatic, 7 blades
Optics
16 elements, 13 groups
Mount Variant
KAF
Check camera compatibility
Max. Aperture
F3.5-6.3
Min. Aperture
F22-45
Focusing
AF (screwdrive)
Quick-shift
No
Min. Focus
45 cm
Max. Magnification
0.28x
Filter Size
62 mm
Internal Focus
Yes
Field of View (Diag. / Horiz.)

APS-C: 76-6.5 ° / 67-5 °
Hood
PH-RBB 62 mm
Case
S80-120
Lens Cap
Coating
SMC
Weather Sealing
No
Other Features
Zoom Lock
Diam x Length
75 x 85.5 mm (3 x 3.4 in.)
Weight
455 g (16 oz.)
Production Years
2007 to 2011
Engraved Name
smc PENTAX-DA 1:3.5-6.3 18-250 mm ED AL [IF]
Product Code
21697
Reviews
User reviews
Notes
Aspherical and ED elements.
Features:
Screwdrive AutofocusInternal FocusingAutomatic ApertureAPS-C Digital OnlyDiscontinued
Sample Photos: View Sample Photos
Price History:



Add Review of SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 50
Junior Member

Registered: May, 2012
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 42

7 users found this helpful
Review Date: May 29, 2014 Recommended | Price: $300.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Versatile, Reasonably Sharp, convenient
Cons: zoom creep, extension, low light focus hunting
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 9    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: K100D Super, K30   

For its purpose, this is one great lens. While it gave me above average photos on the K100D Super, it is a beast on the K30. Images are so good. There are issues in low light when it hunts a lot. But for its versatility, I found it my main go to lens especially when I need 18mm in an instance and 200mm immediately after. The loss in IQ is seen particularly only for tiny subjects like ants. For all others, it is a great lens.

The zoom creep was fixed by using a simple plastic band like others have done. No other complaints.

Mango Leaves in Rain


Straw Boats


Pelican


Ape
   
Forum Member

Registered: February, 2014
Location: Warsaw
Posts: 76

6 users found this helpful
Review Date: June 18, 2017 Recommended | Price: $270.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: versatile, sharp, build quality, I.Q.
Cons: zoom creep, purple fringing
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 10    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: K-70   

Really good lens, for what it is i.e. super-zoom. Mine copy is sharp, at 18mm even wide open (but wit some aberrations), after ~30mm needs to be stooped down two steps to get best results. At 250mm soft to f8, best for f11-13
In range 18-55 much better then kit DA18-55, less aberrations, better sharpness and in general faster. Where kit at 55mm is f5.6 this lens is f4.5 up to 70mm.
Sadly you might need some post processing software to get rid of vignetting and distortion at 18mm.

f3.5 to around 22mm
f4 to around 35mm
f4.5 to 70mm
f5.6 to 170mm

Lens has obvious limitations it is soft at 250mm, at f11 is better but mainly in centre of an image (which is usually main scope off the telephoto) happily for 200mm and f8 it is really decent.
Bokeh is not so bad, lens can imitate macro capability pretty well which can be seen on attached image.

While it is really good for range 18-70mm everything above is simply added value so if you can buy it for around 250$ it is really worth considering. It is perfect lens for sunny day or holidays very versatile, definitely worth buying if versatility is most important factor.


18 centre


18 extreme

70mm

100mm

200mm














   
Veteran Member

Registered: February, 2011
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 830

5 users found this helpful
Review Date: December 12, 2011 Recommended | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Decent IQ, Versatile, Convenience, Compact and light for a super-zoom
Cons: Barrel creep, distortion at wide end, purple fringing at long end
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 10    New or Used: Used   

I bought this lens almost a year ago as a general walk-around and an upgrade from the 18-55mm kit. With all the reviews I’ve read, including the Tamron version, I wasn’t expecting an IQ rivaling that of prime or other more expensive zooms. The first thing I noticed after mounting the lens and unlocking the zoom ring with the camera faced down is its legendary “zoom-creep!” As soon as I pushed the lock switch, the barrel came out full length where it almost hit the table.

After nearly a year, here is my impression of this lens.

Pros:
- Color rendition is considerably better than the DA18-55mm.
- Fairly decent overall IQ rivals that of the DA55-300mm, especially between f5.6 – f11.
- Very good outdoor lens (bright and sunny conditions)
- Compact and light-weight for a super zoom
- Unbeatable versatility

Cons:
- Significant barrel distortion at 18mm, though easily corrected in post-processing
- Tends to get soft between f3.5 – f4.5
- IQ begins to degrade, though still acceptable, at 100mm and above
- Barrel creep
- Purple fringing at the long end
- Hunts in low light
- Discontinued and not particularly easy to find

My family and I recently visited Disneyland. This was the only lens I used throughout the trip. It was all I needed, and I never felt or wished I had something else. Sure, it’s on the slow side and may not have the IQ of a prime or a more expensive zoom, but for traveling, where my primary consideration is enjoying the vacation with my family, the versatility, convenience, and performance of this lens is simply unbeatable. In my opinion, the DA 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 would be an excellent choice for anyone looking for a decent all-in-one walk-around travel or vacation lens.
   
Site Supporter

Registered: November, 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,223

4 users found this helpful
Review Date: May 13, 2011 Recommended | Price: $580.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Excellent IQ, great focal length range, light weight, portable, all purpose lens
Cons: I really do not have one negative aspect yet
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Autofocus: 10    Handling: 9    Value: 10    New or Used: Used   

I purchased this lens with low expectation, trying just to replace my two kit lenses (18-55 & 50-200). However, this lens is much more than that. I am happy I got it. It is my stay-on-the-camera-most-of-the-time-lens. It is wonderful, quick to use and relatively fast from 28 to 200 mm or so. At 250 I have gotten wonderful photos outdoors. THe lens is a real winner. It has a lock at 18mm to avoid the creeping most zooms have. I love it. I have discovered shooting wide angle with this lens. Image compares to my primes in those instances. I am very please I got this lens. Besides, it is designed for digitals SLRs and functions with the quality of Pentax and great digitally. I recommend it



San Juan Bautista Mission Chapel by Palenquero, on Flickr



Mission San Miguel, California by Palenquero, on Flickr


Jonathan Livington Seagull by Palenquero, on Flickr


Monterey Bay at Dusk by Palenquero, on Flickr


Monterey Cannery Row Sunset by Palenquero, on Flickr


Lonely Seagull in Monterey by Palenquero, on Flickr


Hartnell College by Palenquero, on Flickr


Mission San Miguel Courtyard by Palenquero, on Flickr


Los Olivos, California by Palenquero, on Flickr
=========================

This is an update to share with you, that the performance of this lens is way superior to what I have written before. Now that I am using a K5, this lens has become a monster. I love it. Before I was using the Kx.
   
Veteran Member

Registered: June, 2011
Location: Near Sydney, NSW
Posts: 331

3 users found this helpful
Review Date: June 20, 2013 Recommended | Price: $540.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: 14x zoom, all areas of I.Q.
Cons: Umm..?
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 9    Autofocus: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: Pentax K-5   

They say "You can't have everything." Well, this lens does it's best to prove "them" wrong.
It has a ridiculously huge zoom range, and while the aperture may slow down towards the long end, the image quality does not - it is seriously impressive.

I realise that it's more expensive than the kit lenses, but it also kicks their arses for quality, build AND image. The 50-200 isn't as good, and it's only 4x zoom...

Now, I have most of Pentax's best lenses (DA* 50-135, 16-50 and some primes) because I shoot professionally a few times a year, but I have EVEN used this at weddings - because there are times when I know I'll need 18 one minute and 200 the next, and what's more, it does push me to f5.0 by 180mm, but still that's not too bad!
Sometimes, using Lightroom, I see images from this and think "Oh that must have been the 50-135,.. I don't remember getting that close?" and I look at the data but nope, it's this badboy, at 200mm, f5.6.

My criticism of this lens is really of Pentax - WHY isn't this more common and available? It should be a kit option on things like the K-30 and K500, for a little bit more cash. Also it'd be handy for everyone if it were WR but I suppose that WOULD be being greedy of me.
   
amateur dirt farmer

Registered: December, 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Posts: 41,257

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: November 1, 2021 Recommended | Price: $199.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: convenience of a superzoom, color, clarity, bokeh
Cons: plastic build quality, slow aperture
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 9    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 8    New or Used: New    Camera Used: K-3   

early on, I had a used copy of the DA 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 ED AL (IF) and loved it; when the focus gears wore out, I sent it off for repairs and it was determined that the parts were not available for a repair with out a donor lens, so I had to let it go...

I've missed it... and tried to fill that hole with several other superzooms and none of them ever had the colors or focus of the 18-250 - I've had a good copy of the DA 18-135mm for a while, but that lens just wasn't "it"...

so when I came across a NIB copy of the 18-250, I bought it.... and here we go:

it is a superzoom with a 'slow' aperture that gets worse the further out you go in focal lengths.... so you need a truckload of light to avoid having to run higher ISO....

MFD is reasonable, but allows for close up shots at the further focal lengths...

significant barrel distortion at 18-20mm, but almost any post-processing software will cure that, plus the lens will also give you purple fringing if you aren't careful about bright highlights/backlighting...

typical plastic build quality for a consumer zoom lens - zoom ring is nicely-damped, but the tiny focus ring has that expected plastic grittiness to it...

but - it is a superzoom, not a highly-corrected prime, so this is a lens of convenience not art...


or is it?

gimme some bokeh:

spider in web by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

bokeh under the willow by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

jelly beans by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

or how about some color:

turning maples by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

pop stand by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

pumpkins & chrysanthemums by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

and the convenience of the superzoom is hard to ignore...

at 18mm:

lawn chairs, west field by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

at 250mm:

white-capped sparrow by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr

so - hugely capable, convenient, and actually quite competent....

the rest of my flickr album with this lens:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/pepperberryfarm/albums/72157719858443634/page1
   
New Member

Registered: June, 2012
Posts: 8

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: June 24, 2013 Recommended | Price: $500.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: 18-250, build quality, I.Q.
Cons: Bulky and a bit pricey (but a heck of a lot smaller and cheaper than the 3 lenses it replaces)
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Autofocus: 9    Handling: 10    Value: 10    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: Pentax K-5 IIs   

My pros and cons sum it up really. In fact, given that the 55-300 is f5.8 at the long end (1/4 of a stop faster than this), I'm not sure why you'd bother owning the 55-300 and an 18-55, this does the same job as them both - and when comparing it with the 18-55, does it better too. (At 55mm this lens has only been forced to f4.5 not f5.6 - and it's sharper as well).

I got this thinking it would be "handy", but planning to use my higher grade lenses more often, but I was blown away by the quality of this and Lightroom tells me it's now my most used lens by about 15%, and I've had it for half the time of most of the others.
   
New Member

Registered: May, 2012
Posts: 14

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: May 16, 2012 Recommended | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: versatility, decent IQ
Cons: purple fringes, distorsion, barrel creep, vigneting
Sharpness: 7    Aberrations: 5    Bokeh: 5    Autofocus: 6    Handling: 8    Value: 8    New or Used: New    Camera Used: K-20   

I purchased this lens as a kit with my K-20. It's a very useful range but the quality you can expect from these superzooms is not great. I use it for holidays and family pics.

The good:

- Decent IQ until 100-150mm
- Color rendition is quite ok
- Unbeatible versatibility
- Very good under good light conditions

The bad:

- Vigneting. Worse if you use a filter, specially at 18mm
- Barrel creep
- Distorsions at 18mm
- Purple fringes
- AF hunts in low light
- No quick shift

At the end, it won't get you the quality of a prime lens but a must have when travelling.
   
New Member

Registered: August, 2010
Location: Piter
Posts: 13

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: October 24, 2010 Not Recommended | Price: $400.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Versatility
Cons: shooting in the dark

Отличный объектив для путешествий и не только. Использую его как штатный.
   
Pentaxian

Registered: August, 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 11,250

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: October 17, 2008 Recommended | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Versatility (zoom range + macro) & optical performance
Cons: some vignetting

This lens has been called the "undisputed king of superzooms" (https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/29771-utili-zoom.html).

I like it a lot for its versatility. Having 18mm at the low end of the focal range is great. The 10mm difference compared to a zoom that starts with 28mm is dramatic. In comparison, 50mm more or less at the end of the focal range do not matter that much. In many tests the 18-250mm has been found to be a great improvement over the Tamron 18-200. (Note that the Tamron and Pentax versions of the 18-250mm lens are identical modulo cosmetics.)

With body shake reduction activated, I found that I could take tack sharp shots even at 250mm without a tripod, with proper holding techniques.

I love its close focus ability of 45cm throughout the entire zoom range. Strictly speaking its not a true macro (1:1 magnification factor) as its magnification factor is "just" 1:3.5. This is due to the fact that changing the focus also changes the effective focal length. Bob Atkins reckons that the effective focal length of the 18-250mm is ~125mm at its close focus distance of 45cm. (See his Tamron 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 AF Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Review for his findings on this matter.) Still you can make some great macro shots with it with an incredibly low barrel distortion of just 0.01%. I've heard one person moan about focus influencing focal length -- a common side effect with internal focus lenses -- but frankly I couldn't care less. I get maximum zoom for objects that are far away, plus great macro capability. A 300mm telephoto with a close focusing distance of just 150cm gives less magnification.

An advantage of the internal focusing system (IF) is that you can use a polarising filter, which won't turn when you are changing the focus.

Like many modern designs from Tamron/Sigma, the 18-250mm optimises the centre sharpness in favour of better average across the field performance. That means that you'll get excellent centre sharpness but corners won't be near up to that level, in particular not with higher apertures. I believe this is a good decision as you'll get the chance to get great IQ for where it matters. Often things that happen in the corners are not important and will not be in the plane of focus anyhow. If you want to take landscape pictures that are sharp from corner to corner, near to far, then you'll need much more expensive lenses or, best, a view camera. For a print size up to 8x10, the 18-250mm will deliver A/A+ performance in almost all focal length and aperture settings and even with 11x14 prints you'll only get down to a B with some settings. (Source: PopPhoto Review of the Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II Macro)

At this price point and the very high zoom range, there are obviously some downsides:

You'll observe vignetting across the whole zoom range unless you stop down the lens sufficiently.

The lens isn't fast to begin with (f/3.5-6.3) and the need to stop it down in order to avoid vignetting / increase corner performance doesn't make it faster. However, with body shake reduction and very good low light performance from my K100D I've always been a very happy user so far. Even low light indoor shots worked well for me. I have never tried a prime yet so I don't have the comparison but on an absolute level, I'm more than happy.

The barrel distortion at 18mm is quite high but in normal scenes you'll only really notice it by comparison with a corrected version. This, and some CA (chromatic aberration) can be easily corrected with post processing (e.g. Photo Laboratory or Raw Therapee).

My copy doesn't suffer from zoom creep. The barrel will extend on its own when you point it downwards and shake it hard but in normal shooting conditions, it will stay at the same focal length.

Conclusion: For specific applications (corner to corner sharpness, 1:1 macro, available light shooting, etc.) you'll obviously find specialist lenses that will outperform the 18-250mm. However, they will also be much more expensive and you'll have to be prepared to change lenses all the time. This is not only cumbersome and may make you not take a shot sometimes, but also increases the risk of getting dust/pollen on your sensor when changing lenses outdoors. In terms of versatility I think the 18-250 is hard to beat and it provides remarkable optical performance, not only with respect to its zoom range, but also in absolute terms. If your print sizes are 11x14 and lower, I believe you'll be very happy with this lens all the time. Used within certain parameters, it will provide outstanding performance for even bigger print sizes.

Specifications:
18-250mm, f/3.5- 6.3.
16 elements in 13 groups.
Two LD (low dispersion) elements, one AD (anomolous dispersion) element, two hybrid aspherical elements.
Internal focusing.
Focusing turns 55 degrees counterclockwise.
Close focusing distance: 45cm.
Weight: 450g
Filter size: 62mm.
Zoom lock at 18mm to prevent zoom creep while carrying.
Petal-shaped lens hood included

Also see http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/release_2006/news0914.html

Many user testimonies can be found here: http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=309&sort=7&cat=43&page=1
   
New Member

Registered: October, 2010
Location: texas
Posts: 9

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: November 28, 2018 Recommended | Price: $228.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Great everyday go-to lens - pretty good auto focus
Cons: A little soft at times - Lens will extend itself to full zoom
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 9    Handling: 8    Value: 9    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: K-5   

I may have rated this lens higher than some other folks did but that's because I know its limits and as a go-to lens it's performing fine, not perfect. Each rating I gave it was dependent on knowing where to get the good performance. Full zoom, a little soft. Good bokeh? Only on some settings which I won't go into here.

We now have two if these. The original one (bought new) had become a little dusty inside. Cleaning cost was close to the cost of this used one advertised in 90% new condition. It's in great shape. On the original lens I removed the front glass, cleaned the back or it and the front of the second element. I'm not about to go any further into the cleaning of deeper elements but it's now in great shape too. Dust was mostly in the front. So beware, if you drag your camera where we do, mountain trails, deserts, and filthy dusty abandoned buildings the seals may eventually allow dust inside.

If you use it awhile you'll understand its limits but overall it does fine for everyday shooting. If you want something perfect, use a fast prime. (I love old manual glass). If I could afford a faster zoom I'd have one. Fastest you'll get on this is f3.5. My wife uses it on road trips and often just grabs a quick shot from the car while moving. She's mastered its limits as I cannot get those shots like she does.

Negative (which you get used to) is that the lens must be locked with a tab to keep in fully retracted. Otherwise, while hanging from the camera strap the weight of the zoom section will allow the lens to extend. A bit aggravating till you get used to it.

Overall - we like it.
   
Senior Member

Registered: October, 2010
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 214

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: November 23, 2018 Recommended | Price: $73.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Convenience, range of focal lengths
Cons: Plastic feel
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 10    Value: 10    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: K-5IIs   

I took a gamble on this lens, advertised as "aperture lever not returning". I found that it had suffered an impact to its back end which had bent the rotating aperture lever plate. Twelve screws, some careful straightening of the plate and half an hour later I was such a happy bunny! It's now pretty much a permanent fixture on one body or another because the focal lengths it offers seem to be an exact fit to our new kitten!
   
Pentaxian

Registered: February, 2015
Posts: 12,178

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: April 6, 2015 Recommended | Price: $450.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Very good for holiday time
Cons: Softer from 130mm onward, not so contrasty, AF noisy
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 8    New or Used: New   

This lens is very convenient, and if you know well its performance points, you can get a lot of good shots out of it. This zoom really reach limits above 100mm/130mm where it gets a bit softer and images are not so contrasty, and more increase of iso is need to still get sharp images with longer focal lengths. However, this zoom is known to be a Tamron design, qualified by Pentax, but I was surprised that it performed better that the DA 18-55 and pretty sharp until 130mm. Also, due to the number of lenses/glass quality, it looses some light along the way. So, I made around 20000 travel photos with this lens and the K200D, both still works perfect, and some of my best photos were taken with the 18-250 and K200 in dusty country side of north Africa. It's kind of a robust work horse.

Pros:
- focal range
- compact
- light weight for this focal range
- decent sharpness until about 130mm.
- reliable screw drive AF

Cons:
- no so bight, works with good sun light at > 150mm
- sharpness above 130mm
- image contrast , colors a bit soft, no so saturated
- AF a bit noisy
   
New Member

Registered: July, 2011
Posts: 8

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: October 14, 2014 Recommended | Price: $275.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Range, zoom, image quality, weight
Cons: Limited to small aperture wide open, limited resolution
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 10    Value: 9    New or Used: Used    Camera Used: k5   

A great lens. I had the Tamron version, of which the AF was not functioning. I decided not to repair the Tamron but have this one (used) instead.
The images seem to be even more rich in color than the Tamron's. The zoom is still very useful for basically any condition. Zoomed in, one has to keep it very steady though, since the aperture is not very large for large focal lengths.

One more reason (apart from the coating) reason to prefer it over de Tamron: the images can be in-camera (or with Photoshop afterwards) corrected for lens aberations.

Overall: the one lens I bring for any condition. And the Pentax has an advantage over the Tamron (and make out for yourself what you are willing to pay for that)
   
Junior Member

Registered: June, 2008
Location: long island ny
Posts: 31

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: July 28, 2012 Recommended | Price: $450.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: good all in one
Cons: none, heavy
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 8    Handling: 7    Value: 9    New or Used: New    Camera Used: k20d, k-7, k-5   

This is a great travel lens. I have had it for 3 years. I had the lens creep and some dust in it. I sent it to pentax and they cleaned it and fixed the creep. I have had no problem since. When I go on a trip, this is the only lens I bring. I do prefer the limited primes and manual focus A lens when home.
Add Review of SMC Pentax-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF]



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top