Author: | | Junior Member Registered: May, 2012 Location: Hyderabad Posts: 42 7 users found this helpful | Review Date: May 29, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $300.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Versatile, Reasonably Sharp, convenient | Cons: | zoom creep, extension, low light focus hunting | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K100D Super, K30
| | For its purpose, this is one great lens. While it gave me above average photos on the K100D Super, it is a beast on the K30. Images are so good. There are issues in low light when it hunts a lot. But for its versatility, I found it my main go to lens especially when I need 18mm in an instance and 200mm immediately after. The loss in IQ is seen particularly only for tiny subjects like ants. For all others, it is a great lens.
The zoom creep was fixed by using a simple plastic band like others have done. No other complaints.
Mango Leaves in Rain
Straw Boats
Pelican
Ape | | | | | Forum Member Registered: February, 2014 Location: Warsaw Posts: 76 6 users found this helpful | Review Date: June 18, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $270.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | versatile, sharp, build quality, I.Q. | Cons: | zoom creep, purple fringing | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-70
| | Really good lens, for what it is i.e. super-zoom. Mine copy is sharp, at 18mm even wide open (but wit some aberrations), after ~30mm needs to be stooped down two steps to get best results. At 250mm soft to f8, best for f11-13
In range 18-55 much better then kit DA18-55, less aberrations, better sharpness and in general faster. Where kit at 55mm is f5.6 this lens is f4.5 up to 70mm.
Sadly you might need some post processing software to get rid of vignetting and distortion at 18mm.
f3.5 to around 22mm
f4 to around 35mm
f4.5 to 70mm
f5.6 to 170mm
Lens has obvious limitations it is soft at 250mm, at f11 is better but mainly in centre of an image (which is usually main scope off the telephoto) happily for 200mm and f8 it is really decent.
Bokeh is not so bad, lens can imitate macro capability pretty well which can be seen on attached image.
While it is really good for range 18-70mm everything above is simply added value so if you can buy it for around 250$ it is really worth considering. It is perfect lens for sunny day or holidays very versatile, definitely worth buying if versatility is most important factor.
18 centre
18 extreme
70mm
100mm
200mm | | | | Veteran Member Registered: February, 2011 Location: Colorado, USA Posts: 830 5 users found this helpful | Review Date: December 12, 2011 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Decent IQ, Versatile, Convenience, Compact and light for a super-zoom | Cons: | Barrel creep, distortion at wide end, purple fringing at long end | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
| | I bought this lens almost a year ago as a general walk-around and an upgrade from the 18-55mm kit. With all the reviews I’ve read, including the Tamron version, I wasn’t expecting an IQ rivaling that of prime or other more expensive zooms. The first thing I noticed after mounting the lens and unlocking the zoom ring with the camera faced down is its legendary “zoom-creep!” As soon as I pushed the lock switch, the barrel came out full length where it almost hit the table.
After nearly a year, here is my impression of this lens.
Pros:
- Color rendition is considerably better than the DA18-55mm.
- Fairly decent overall IQ rivals that of the DA55-300mm, especially between f5.6 – f11.
- Very good outdoor lens (bright and sunny conditions)
- Compact and light-weight for a super zoom
- Unbeatable versatility
Cons:
- Significant barrel distortion at 18mm, though easily corrected in post-processing
- Tends to get soft between f3.5 – f4.5
- IQ begins to degrade, though still acceptable, at 100mm and above
- Barrel creep
- Purple fringing at the long end
- Hunts in low light
- Discontinued and not particularly easy to find
My family and I recently visited Disneyland. This was the only lens I used throughout the trip. It was all I needed, and I never felt or wished I had something else. Sure, it’s on the slow side and may not have the IQ of a prime or a more expensive zoom, but for traveling, where my primary consideration is enjoying the vacation with my family, the versatility, convenience, and performance of this lens is simply unbeatable. In my opinion, the DA 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 would be an excellent choice for anyone looking for a decent all-in-one walk-around travel or vacation lens.
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: November, 2010 Location: California Posts: 2,223 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: May 13, 2011 | Recommended | Price: $580.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Excellent IQ, great focal length range, light weight, portable, all purpose lens | Cons: | I really do not have one negative aspect yet | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 9
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
| | I purchased this lens with low expectation, trying just to replace my two kit lenses (18-55 & 50-200). However, this lens is much more than that. I am happy I got it. It is my stay-on-the-camera-most-of-the-time-lens. It is wonderful, quick to use and relatively fast from 28 to 200 mm or so. At 250 I have gotten wonderful photos outdoors. THe lens is a real winner. It has a lock at 18mm to avoid the creeping most zooms have. I love it. I have discovered shooting wide angle with this lens. Image compares to my primes in those instances. I am very please I got this lens. Besides, it is designed for digitals SLRs and functions with the quality of Pentax and great digitally. I recommend it San Juan Bautista Mission Chapel by Palenquero, on Flickr Mission San Miguel, California by Palenquero, on Flickr Jonathan Livington Seagull by Palenquero, on Flickr Monterey Bay at Dusk by Palenquero, on Flickr Monterey Cannery Row Sunset by Palenquero, on Flickr Lonely Seagull in Monterey by Palenquero, on Flickr Hartnell College by Palenquero, on Flickr Mission San Miguel Courtyard by Palenquero, on Flickr Los Olivos, California by Palenquero, on Flickr
=========================
This is an update to share with you, that the performance of this lens is way superior to what I have written before. Now that I am using a K5, this lens has become a monster. I love it. Before I was using the Kx.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: June, 2011 Location: Near Sydney, NSW Posts: 331 3 users found this helpful | Review Date: June 20, 2013 | Recommended | Price: $540.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | 14x zoom, all areas of I.Q. | Cons: | Umm..? | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K-5
| | They say "You can't have everything." Well, this lens does it's best to prove "them" wrong.
It has a ridiculously huge zoom range, and while the aperture may slow down towards the long end, the image quality does not - it is seriously impressive.
I realise that it's more expensive than the kit lenses, but it also kicks their arses for quality, build AND image. The 50-200 isn't as good, and it's only 4x zoom...
Now, I have most of Pentax's best lenses (DA* 50-135, 16-50 and some primes) because I shoot professionally a few times a year, but I have EVEN used this at weddings - because there are times when I know I'll need 18 one minute and 200 the next, and what's more, it does push me to f5.0 by 180mm, but still that's not too bad!
Sometimes, using Lightroom, I see images from this and think "Oh that must have been the 50-135,.. I don't remember getting that close?" and I look at the data but nope, it's this badboy, at 200mm, f5.6.
My criticism of this lens is really of Pentax - WHY isn't this more common and available? It should be a kit option on things like the K-30 and K500, for a little bit more cash. Also it'd be handy for everyone if it were WR but I suppose that WOULD be being greedy of me.
| | | | amateur dirt farmer Registered: December, 2014 Location: probably out in a field somewhere... Posts: 41,257 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: November 1, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $199.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | convenience of a superzoom, color, clarity, bokeh | Cons: | plastic build quality, slow aperture | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 8
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-3
| | early on, I had a used copy of the DA 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 ED AL (IF) and loved it; when the focus gears wore out, I sent it off for repairs and it was determined that the parts were not available for a repair with out a donor lens, so I had to let it go...
I've missed it... and tried to fill that hole with several other superzooms and none of them ever had the colors or focus of the 18-250 - I've had a good copy of the DA 18-135mm for a while, but that lens just wasn't "it"...
so when I came across a NIB copy of the 18-250, I bought it.... and here we go:
it is a superzoom with a 'slow' aperture that gets worse the further out you go in focal lengths.... so you need a truckload of light to avoid having to run higher ISO....
MFD is reasonable, but allows for close up shots at the further focal lengths...
significant barrel distortion at 18-20mm, but almost any post-processing software will cure that, plus the lens will also give you purple fringing if you aren't careful about bright highlights/backlighting...
typical plastic build quality for a consumer zoom lens - zoom ring is nicely-damped, but the tiny focus ring has that expected plastic grittiness to it...
but - it is a superzoom, not a highly-corrected prime, so this is a lens of convenience not art...
or is it?
gimme some bokeh: spider in web by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr bokeh under the willow by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr jelly beans by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
or how about some color: turning maples by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr pop stand by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr pumpkins & chrysanthemums by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
and the convenience of the superzoom is hard to ignore...
at 18mm: lawn chairs, west field by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
at 250mm: white-capped sparrow by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
so - hugely capable, convenient, and actually quite competent....
the rest of my flickr album with this lens: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pepperberryfarm/albums/72157719858443634/page1 | | | | New Member Registered: June, 2012 Posts: 8 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: June 24, 2013 | Recommended | Price: $500.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | 18-250, build quality, I.Q. | Cons: | Bulky and a bit pricey (but a heck of a lot smaller and cheaper than the 3 lenses it replaces) | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K-5 IIs
| | My pros and cons sum it up really. In fact, given that the 55-300 is f5.8 at the long end (1/4 of a stop faster than this), I'm not sure why you'd bother owning the 55-300 and an 18-55, this does the same job as them both - and when comparing it with the 18-55, does it better too. (At 55mm this lens has only been forced to f4.5 not f5.6 - and it's sharper as well).
I got this thinking it would be "handy", but planning to use my higher grade lenses more often, but I was blown away by the quality of this and Lightroom tells me it's now my most used lens by about 15%, and I've had it for half the time of most of the others.
| | | | New Member Registered: May, 2012 Posts: 14 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: May 16, 2012 | Recommended
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | versatility, decent IQ | Cons: | purple fringes, distorsion, barrel creep, vigneting | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 5
Bokeh: 5
Autofocus: 6
Handling: 8
Value: 8
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-20
| | I purchased this lens as a kit with my K-20. It's a very useful range but the quality you can expect from these superzooms is not great. I use it for holidays and family pics.
The good:
- Decent IQ until 100-150mm
- Color rendition is quite ok
- Unbeatible versatibility
- Very good under good light conditions
The bad:
- Vigneting. Worse if you use a filter, specially at 18mm
- Barrel creep
- Distorsions at 18mm
- Purple fringes
- AF hunts in low light
- No quick shift
At the end, it won't get you the quality of a prime lens but a must have when travelling.
| | | | New Member Registered: August, 2010 Location: Piter Posts: 13 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: October 24, 2010 | Not Recommended | Price: $400.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Versatility | Cons: | shooting in the dark | | Отличный объектив для путешествий и не только. Использую его как штатный.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: August, 2008 Location: Wellington, New Zealand Posts: 11,250 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: October 17, 2008 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Versatility (zoom range + macro) & optical performance | Cons: | some vignetting | | This lens has been called the "undisputed king of superzooms" (https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/29771-utili-zoom.html).
I like it a lot for its versatility. Having 18mm at the low end of the focal range is great. The 10mm difference compared to a zoom that starts with 28mm is dramatic. In comparison, 50mm more or less at the end of the focal range do not matter that much. In many tests the 18-250mm has been found to be a great improvement over the Tamron 18-200. (Note that the Tamron and Pentax versions of the 18-250mm lens are identical modulo cosmetics.)
With body shake reduction activated, I found that I could take tack sharp shots even at 250mm without a tripod, with proper holding techniques.
I love its close focus ability of 45cm throughout the entire zoom range. Strictly speaking its not a true macro (1:1 magnification factor) as its magnification factor is "just" 1:3.5. This is due to the fact that changing the focus also changes the effective focal length. Bob Atkins reckons that the effective focal length of the 18-250mm is ~125mm at its close focus distance of 45cm. (See his Tamron 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 AF Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Review for his findings on this matter.) Still you can make some great macro shots with it with an incredibly low barrel distortion of just 0.01%. I've heard one person moan about focus influencing focal length -- a common side effect with internal focus lenses -- but frankly I couldn't care less. I get maximum zoom for objects that are far away, plus great macro capability. A 300mm telephoto with a close focusing distance of just 150cm gives less magnification.
An advantage of the internal focusing system (IF) is that you can use a polarising filter, which won't turn when you are changing the focus.
Like many modern designs from Tamron/Sigma, the 18-250mm optimises the centre sharpness in favour of better average across the field performance. That means that you'll get excellent centre sharpness but corners won't be near up to that level, in particular not with higher apertures. I believe this is a good decision as you'll get the chance to get great IQ for where it matters. Often things that happen in the corners are not important and will not be in the plane of focus anyhow. If you want to take landscape pictures that are sharp from corner to corner, near to far, then you'll need much more expensive lenses or, best, a view camera. For a print size up to 8x10, the 18-250mm will deliver A/A+ performance in almost all focal length and aperture settings and even with 11x14 prints you'll only get down to a B with some settings. (Source: PopPhoto Review of the Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II Macro)
At this price point and the very high zoom range, there are obviously some downsides:
You'll observe vignetting across the whole zoom range unless you stop down the lens sufficiently.
The lens isn't fast to begin with (f/3.5-6.3) and the need to stop it down in order to avoid vignetting / increase corner performance doesn't make it faster. However, with body shake reduction and very good low light performance from my K100D I've always been a very happy user so far. Even low light indoor shots worked well for me. I have never tried a prime yet so I don't have the comparison but on an absolute level, I'm more than happy.
The barrel distortion at 18mm is quite high but in normal scenes you'll only really notice it by comparison with a corrected version. This, and some CA (chromatic aberration) can be easily corrected with post processing (e.g. Photo Laboratory or Raw Therapee).
My copy doesn't suffer from zoom creep. The barrel will extend on its own when you point it downwards and shake it hard but in normal shooting conditions, it will stay at the same focal length.
Conclusion: For specific applications (corner to corner sharpness, 1:1 macro, available light shooting, etc.) you'll obviously find specialist lenses that will outperform the 18-250mm. However, they will also be much more expensive and you'll have to be prepared to change lenses all the time. This is not only cumbersome and may make you not take a shot sometimes, but also increases the risk of getting dust/pollen on your sensor when changing lenses outdoors. In terms of versatility I think the 18-250 is hard to beat and it provides remarkable optical performance, not only with respect to its zoom range, but also in absolute terms. If your print sizes are 11x14 and lower, I believe you'll be very happy with this lens all the time. Used within certain parameters, it will provide outstanding performance for even bigger print sizes.
Specifications:
18-250mm, f/3.5- 6.3.
16 elements in 13 groups.
Two LD (low dispersion) elements, one AD (anomolous dispersion) element, two hybrid aspherical elements.
Internal focusing.
Focusing turns 55 degrees counterclockwise.
Close focusing distance: 45cm.
Weight: 450g
Filter size: 62mm.
Zoom lock at 18mm to prevent zoom creep while carrying.
Petal-shaped lens hood included
Also see http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/news/release_2006/news0914.html
Many user testimonies can be found here: http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=309&sort=7&cat=43&page=1 | | | | New Member Registered: October, 2010 Location: texas Posts: 9 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 28, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $228.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Great everyday go-to lens - pretty good auto focus | Cons: | A little soft at times - Lens will extend itself to full zoom | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-5
| | I may have rated this lens higher than some other folks did but that's because I know its limits and as a go-to lens it's performing fine, not perfect. Each rating I gave it was dependent on knowing where to get the good performance. Full zoom, a little soft. Good bokeh? Only on some settings which I won't go into here.
We now have two if these. The original one (bought new) had become a little dusty inside. Cleaning cost was close to the cost of this used one advertised in 90% new condition. It's in great shape. On the original lens I removed the front glass, cleaned the back or it and the front of the second element. I'm not about to go any further into the cleaning of deeper elements but it's now in great shape too. Dust was mostly in the front. So beware, if you drag your camera where we do, mountain trails, deserts, and filthy dusty abandoned buildings the seals may eventually allow dust inside.
If you use it awhile you'll understand its limits but overall it does fine for everyday shooting. If you want something perfect, use a fast prime. (I love old manual glass). If I could afford a faster zoom I'd have one. Fastest you'll get on this is f3.5. My wife uses it on road trips and often just grabs a quick shot from the car while moving. She's mastered its limits as I cannot get those shots like she does.
Negative (which you get used to) is that the lens must be locked with a tab to keep in fully retracted. Otherwise, while hanging from the camera strap the weight of the zoom section will allow the lens to extend. A bit aggravating till you get used to it.
Overall - we like it.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: October, 2010 Location: South Yorkshire Posts: 214 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 23, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $73.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Convenience, range of focal lengths | Cons: | Plastic feel | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-5IIs
| | I took a gamble on this lens, advertised as "aperture lever not returning". I found that it had suffered an impact to its back end which had bent the rotating aperture lever plate. Twelve screws, some careful straightening of the plate and half an hour later I was such a happy bunny! It's now pretty much a permanent fixture on one body or another because the focal lengths it offers seem to be an exact fit to our new kitten! | | | | Pentaxian Registered: February, 2015 Posts: 12,178 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: April 6, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $450.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Very good for holiday time | Cons: | Softer from 130mm onward, not so contrasty, AF noisy | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 8
New or Used: New
| | This lens is very convenient, and if you know well its performance points, you can get a lot of good shots out of it. This zoom really reach limits above 100mm/130mm where it gets a bit softer and images are not so contrasty, and more increase of iso is need to still get sharp images with longer focal lengths. However, this zoom is known to be a Tamron design, qualified by Pentax, but I was surprised that it performed better that the DA 18-55 and pretty sharp until 130mm. Also, due to the number of lenses/glass quality, it looses some light along the way. So, I made around 20000 travel photos with this lens and the K200D, both still works perfect, and some of my best photos were taken with the 18-250 and K200 in dusty country side of north Africa. It's kind of a robust work horse.
Pros:
- focal range
- compact
- light weight for this focal range
- decent sharpness until about 130mm.
- reliable screw drive AF
Cons:
- no so bight, works with good sun light at > 150mm
- sharpness above 130mm
- image contrast , colors a bit soft, no so saturated
- AF a bit noisy
| | | | New Member Registered: July, 2011 Posts: 8 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: October 14, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $275.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Range, zoom, image quality, weight | Cons: | Limited to small aperture wide open, limited resolution | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: k5
| | A great lens. I had the Tamron version, of which the AF was not functioning. I decided not to repair the Tamron but have this one (used) instead.
The images seem to be even more rich in color than the Tamron's. The zoom is still very useful for basically any condition. Zoomed in, one has to keep it very steady though, since the aperture is not very large for large focal lengths.
One more reason (apart from the coating) reason to prefer it over de Tamron: the images can be in-camera (or with Photoshop afterwards) corrected for lens aberations.
Overall: the one lens I bring for any condition. And the Pentax has an advantage over the Tamron (and make out for yourself what you are willing to pay for that)
| | | | Junior Member Registered: June, 2008 Location: long island ny Posts: 31 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: July 28, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $450.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | good all in one | Cons: | none, heavy | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 7
Value: 9
New or Used: New
Camera Used: k20d, k-7, k-5
| | This is a great travel lens. I have had it for 3 years. I had the lens creep and some dust in it. I sent it to pentax and they cleaned it and fixed the creep. I have had no problem since. When I go on a trip, this is the only lens I bring. I do prefer the limited primes and manual focus A lens when home.
| | |