Author: | | Forum Member Registered: September, 2022 Location: New Zealand Posts: 98 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 20, 2022 | Recommended | Price: $80.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Reliable weather-sealing; Sharp for its price; Very well-built | Cons: | Minor: The hood interface to the lens can become a bit loose; | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K200D; K-3
| | Background: I bought this lens after getting my K200D, my first digital Pentax, just so I could have a fully water-resistant kit. I am a prime lens shooter so I just placed the lens in the dry box. It was very-slightly used, by the way. In the past year, New Zealand's weather has been rather unpredictable so I found myself using the lens more and more in a stack-o-primes mode and use the 28mm and 35mm focal lenghts most of the time. At 28mm, the fastest aperture is f/4.0 and I can work with that even in low light, especially with the K-3. I have the 18-135mm WR and the 50-200mm WR and I find that I like the weight of the 18-55mm vs the superzoom, even though the latter has better colour separation, contrast and is slightly sharper.
I used this lens during a Single-In challenge in July and was somewhat astounded by the overall performance. I love shooting in challenging weather and the July 2022 here was properly wet. I used a DIY SATOBI profile with the magenta filter. I found the setting here. I shot SooC but please take note that I reduced the standard sharpness to -2, so it won't represent the actual sharpness performance of the lens.
The build quality of the lens is superb as the plastic used is definitely of high standard. One must feel it to understand.
I rated this lens highly because a good copy is an alternative to the premium DA 20-40mm Limited, in my opinion, especially when this is treated as a stack-o-primes.
The weather is still pretty much unpredictable and I find that I keep on using this lens. I now value the WR of Pentax as it gives me total shooting freedom in all types of weather, windy/dusty, wet, etc.
The photos below were shot under heavy rain:
NOTE: Make sure to follow the WR guidelines in this form; Also, allow the body and lens to breath after using it in wet conditions. Proper WR equipment care must be followed at all times.
| | | | | New Member Registered: September, 2016 Posts: 4 3 users found this helpful | Review Date: February 23, 2022 | Recommended
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Light,small,good Range,WR | Cons: | plastic feel, | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 9
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K3 ,K1
| | For a Kit Lens to my K3Prestige Edition,
the optical Performance on APSC is quite good,
and because of WR you can do really much with this ...
But if you like the Build-Quality of the older Glass,
like me (K,M,KA ) You have to switch over.
It can not be as good as Primes, but for a little Package,
it delivers nice Work and the rendition of Colors is Pentax like
52mm Filters are common on K-Serie Lenses, so this is not an Issue for me.
All in All a lens to take with in the wet and heavy Rain !
Where my K287f2 Hollywood is not | | | | Veteran Member Registered: September, 2017 Location: Medellín Posts: 1,322 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: December 23, 2019 | Recommended
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | Metal mount, WR, light | Cons: | | | Good as a starter lens. Mine came with my K-5 as a kit and has done the job well. Unfortunately it became decentered over time. The reason I got the 18-50 WR RE. I don't know if it has anything to do with the plastic parts. Never abused it, but have even shot commercial work with it. When you're shooting in good light outside or in the studio, between f/8-11 you really don't need more. No worries if there's water involved. Get wet, have fun!
| | | | New Member Registered: January, 2019 Posts: 1 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: September 21, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | Cheap, lightweight | Cons: | mostly none. | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 8
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: k70
| | Cheap lens but feels good, amazing IQ even wide open indoor.
Excellent for family purpose.
2 image below are original Jpeg from pentax k70 without editing, auto WB. | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: January, 2019 Location: Geelong, Australia Posts: 341 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: April 23, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $142.24
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Small, light weight, weather resistant. | Cons: | Slightly slow autofocus, bokeh. | | So I have owned the "SMC Pentax-DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL" for quite some time as a kit lens (I actually own 3 of them) and I decided to buy the lens for its weather resistance and the fact that it gets a better rating on this forum.
I guess because I have been so disappointed with the original kit lens I let the newer WR version just sit virtually unused since I bought it.
Today I spent most of the day taking pics with the new lens and I have been pleasantly surprised with the difference in clarity and sharpness of pics.
I will be using this lens more often now as it does the job much better.
| | | | New Member Registered: April, 2018 Posts: 3 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 16, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | light, weather sealing, good picture quality | Cons: | you have to close down to F8 to get really good quality | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K-5
| | Overall a good performer. For those who think that old primes are better, you might be disappointed. I compared it with the A 28mm and the F50mm Macro at F8. It was much better than the 28mm but then of course the 50mm macro was better than the 18-55. But at F8 and landscape there wasn't that much difference and only because I was able to compare the results directly I saw the advantage of the 50mm prime. I had to do a +3 micro adjustment for the AF on my K-5 - but that was a general thing on my camera and not because of the lenses.
I haven't tried it in harsh conditions yet - somehow I'm scared to walk in the rain with my camera | | | | Veteran Member Registered: December, 2013 Posts: 796 5 users found this helpful | Review Date: July 7, 2018 | Not Recommended
| Rating: 6 |
Pros: | WR, flare resistant | Cons: | Not too sharp, slow lens | Sharpness: 6
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-30
| | I got this lens with my first camera and I changed it to a Tamron 18-200 half year later. After getting the superzoom I used this lens only because it's WR. The WR ness is very usful, don't sell it before getting another WR lens with normal FoV!
I don not recommend this lens to invest in, except if you need a WR lens and this is the only one fits your budget. In this case get it! It's not too sharp and the zoom range doesen't go narrow enough. (Also not wide enough...) Altough this lens is a good option in a kit to start with and on a rainy day, it saves your camera!
This lens has better image quality than the Tamron 18-200, but the aperture is slower.
There are situations where the WR was essential. Here are some images: IMG150708_0502 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMG150829_0073 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMG140813_59 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMG0141_141001 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMG140721_68 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMGP7397 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMG0117_150228 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMGP0238 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr IMGP0773 by Benjámin Czétényi, on Flickr
| | | | New Member Registered: August, 2017 Location: Ronneburg Posts: 1 | Review Date: April 26, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $120.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | mostly plastic but with metal mount, good handling, very useful focal range | Cons: | Two ends (18 and 55) are weak by maximum aperture | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K5
| | I'm not a pro photographer and I don't pretend to be one. I needed a wide lens in all weather conditions and the weather resistant feature is the primary reason I purchased this lens. The price was right as well. The camera body is a Pentax K-5. Autofocus works well and is accurate but could be faster. Images are sharp and rich in color. Distortion is evident but only slight in my opinion. Slight chromatic aberration is visible at either end of the range. Both the distortion and the aberration are easily edited in Photoshop or Lightroom. The DA 18-55mm is a great landscape lens. It has quickly become my favorite lens very usefull at this focal range. | | | | Pentaxian Registered: April, 2009 Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 10,888 3 users found this helpful | Review Date: November 22, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $80.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Small, light, WR, good overall IQ when stopped down | Cons: | Soft wide open at 55mm, variable max aperture | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K200D, K3
| | The humble Pentax kit 18-55mm used to be known as the best of the 18-55mm kits when compared to those from Canon, Nikon, Sony etc but I don't know if that's still the case in 2017 as I've heard other brands have upped their game. Still, it provides a good starter option and the WR means it's useful to keep around even after you've progressed to optically superior lenses. Try getting a WR lens for this price from any of the other manufacturers.
I previously owned the mark II (same optical performance) but upgraded to the WR version for my honeymoon in Cambodia and Vietnam and was very glad I did. I have likewise been glad on other rainy days, especially in Japan when for a couple of days of my trip there it rained non-stop all day long and I barely used any other lenses.
The 18-55mm is decent enough, with it's biggest weakness being sharpness wide open, especially at 55mm. I reserve the kit lens almost exclusively for use when it's raining or there's risk of rain and almost always use it in Av or TAv mode at f/8, letting the camera adjust the shutter speed and the sensitivity as necessary. This gets me decently sharp shots albeit without the larger apertures, faster shutter speeds and lower ISOs I'm used to with other lenses. This is my only WR lens at this time and though I aim to get an 18-135 or 16-85 some day, the 18-55 will do in the meantime.
Build quality is very good for the price. Despite being much lighter, it feels more durable than my Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8.
All-in-all I'm satisfied with the IQ from the lens. Sharpness is decent at f/8, contrast is good and I find that I get especially good greens from it, though that may be due to the appearance of foliage on the overcast, rainy days that I use this lens. I don't use it often but I'm usually pleased with the results when I do, as I often forget that this lens is very capable within it's limitations. For what it costs, there's no doubt it's worth having and keeping around.
Some sample shots.
Wet leaves by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
IMGP9900a by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
IMGP8989a by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
2017-11-10_05-45-13 by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
IMGP9907a by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: December, 2014 Location: Colorado Posts: 497 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: September 6, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $70.00
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | WR, light, inexpensive, good image quality in 24-40mm range | Cons: | Two ends (18 and 55) are weak | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 6
Handling: 8
Value: 8
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-5ii
| | In 24-40mm range, this lens is very good and deserves a sharpness grade of 8. However, at the 18mm and 55mm ends, image quality is weak and I can only give a grade of 6. Average is 7. But, for this low price, I'd still recommend it if you want to keep a light and inexpensive APS-C zoom in your pack just for the rainy days ...
| | | | Junior Member Registered: December, 2009 Posts: 25 5 users found this helpful | Review Date: January 21, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $53.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Build, looks, WR, price | Cons: | none | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-50
| | I found a new one for 50€. Ι needed a WR lens for my K-50 body. I've been using the SMC DA L 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL with my K-x for the last 6 years. The WR is a much better lens than the DAL version. Optical is better from my DAL lens with stronger contrast and a bit sharper. It is true that if one has used a really sharp prime, e.g the DA 35mm F2.4 AL, will be disappointed by the results from this zoom. This lens is perfect for my needs, it looks good and the focusing scale is very useful for "zone focusing" with MF. I set it to 24mm, 1/400 and f8 in TAv mode with auto ISO and do most of my street photography without the need to raise the camera to eye level. Results are quite impressive with very few missed moments. I keep the 35mm in jacket's pocket for subjects that require better IQ, e.g. buildings and urban landscapes. The 50-55 mm range, at f6.3 covers my everyday needs for a portrait lens and the minimum focusing distance is useful for simple closeups. I really like this lens, I liked and used the DAL version, so this is an improvement with only 50€.
I definitely recommend this lens.
Pentax K-50 & Pentax-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 WR at f/8 vs Sigma AF 50mm f/2.8 EX DG macro at f/8
K-50 on a tripod both lenses at f/8 the WR at 55mm and its closest focusing distance, natural light, Macro at 50mm and from the same distance as the 18-55mm WR shot
can you spot the difference?
camera on a tripod, RC used, same natural light/conditions
--
edit March 2017
I put a 9 on sharpness, I never expected this kind of image quality from this lens. It must be one of the most underrated kit lenses.
--
flickr album: [~ https://www.flickr.com/photos/foivosloxias/albums/72157677894889322 ]
| | | | New Member Registered: September, 2016 Posts: 3 | Review Date: October 3, 2016 | Not Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 6 |
Pros: | WR | Cons: | Dull rendering. Plastic feel. | Sharpness: 6
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 5
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 6
Value: 7
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-30
| | It's an ok kit lens and it's main selling point, which was also why I for while didn't want to let it go, is the weather sealing. I guess this lens holds up well if you don't shoot raw and let the in camera jpeg engine add punch and color to your pictures. It's classes below the 16-45 f4, which I can compare it directly to. Sharpness is good stopped down. Its main drawback IMO is it's extremely lack lustre rendering. Images I've shot with this lens come out plain dull, it's hard to put your finger on what the problem is - contrast, sharpness, color balance and so forth is all ok - but pics lack the more life like 3D rendering I get with the 16-45 or the "pixie dust" of the pentax-A 35-105 f3.5. Sold it for $40 and haven't missed it since.
| | | | New Member Registered: June, 2014 Location: Sydney Posts: 15 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: August 31, 2016 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Weather-resistant, light, focusses well in a variety of lighting conditions | Cons: | Some softness at wide apertures | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: Pentax K-7
| | Despite having a number of specialised and highly-regarded lenses in my kit bag, this seems to be the one that i go for 90% of the time. Results are generally very good with good colour balance and sharpness (from f5.6 up). The sample photo was taken during one of the lesser-known installations during the 'Vivid' festival held here in Sydney (in this case, 2014). Note that no post-processing was performed to this photo other than some cropping to remove distractions in one of the corners of the shot. No sharpening, curve adjustment, etc. whatsoever was performed so this is for all practical purposes a jpeg straight out of the camera. I used the camera's aperture-priority setting for this photo with (I believe) matrix metering (the various shades and colours that you see on the mirror tiles on the left-side wall and the blue hues on the wall to the right are shown as reproduced by the camera during a single 30 second exposure). | | | | Junior Member Registered: June, 2015 Location: Százhalombatta, Hungary Posts: 37 | Review Date: August 26, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $65.00
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | Good for beginners, weather-sealing, build quality, has some nice moments and even looks good. | Cons: | Distortion at the wide-angle end, some chromatic aberrations near 18mm in high contrast situations, not very sharp | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 7
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K10D
| | I got the white colored DA L version of this lens as my very first lens along with my K10D. (I bought both used, hence the unusual combination)
I wanted a weather-sealed lens for my weather-sealed camera, so that I could be shooting in all conditions, should I desire so. I thought and I still think that this is a nice lens for that purpose and a great first lens for the first-timer. However once you try anything sharper, it will not be so desirable anymore. Once I got my manual Auto Chinon MC 50mm f1.4, I was blown away by it's sharpness and detail, not to mention BOKEH and I no longer used this kit lens. Mine has a plastic mount, is missing the distance scale and is not quick-shift. I also had to grab a hood on Ebay, since I didn't get one with it. (It's a perfect quality copy though, even comes with a PENTAX lettering)
Autofocusing is relatively quick with it, in good light. In low contrast and low light, it tends to hunt, from end to end... as do most PENTAX lenses. Since it is screw driven, it's a bit loud, but nothing too bad, unless it starts hunting.
All in all, it does what it was designed for: a starter lens for the beginner. Don't expect professional quality with it and you won't be disappointed.
One of my best shots with this: Roman Bridge in Százhalombatta, Hungary | 500px | | | | Forum Member Registered: September, 2013 Posts: 62 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 6, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $56.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | WR, lightweight, not expensive | Cons: | not to high resolution wide open | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-30
| | this lens are similar to regular DA 18-55, but WR - dust and weather resistant.
it is mean, that You can use it than raining or in dust environment without doubt.
the lens perform better at f/6.3-8.
at 55 mm/5.6 it has to low resolution, also as 18 mm/3.5.
better resolution at 35 mm/6.3 or f/8.
for the price 56 USD used it is perfect for not to friendly environment.
| | |