Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Pentax Lens Review Database » Film Era Pentax K-Mount Lenses » K Prime Lenses
SMC Pentax 28mm F2 Review RSS Feed

SMC Pentax 28mm F2

Sharpness 
 9.6
Aberrations 
 9.4
Bokeh 
 9.4
Handling 
 9.0
Value 
 8.9
Reviews Views Date of last review
19 167,466 Fri March 31, 2023
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
100% of reviewers $586.54 9.68
SMC Pentax 28mm F2
supersize


Description:
The fast Pentax K 28mm F2 is a one-of-a-kind lens. Future M and A series 28mm F2 offerings were made much smaller but had a different optical formula.

SMC Pentax 28mm F2
© www.pentaxforums.com, sharable with attribution
Image Format
Full-frame / 35mm film
Lens Mount
Pentax K
Aperture Ring
Yes (no A setting)
Diaphragm
Automatic, 6 blades
Optics
9 elements, 8 groups
Mount Variant
K
Check camera compatibility
Max. Aperture
F2
Min. Aperture
F22
Focusing
Manual
Min. Focus
30 cm
Max. Magnification
0.11x
Filter Size
52 mm
Internal Focus
No
Field of View (Diag. / Horiz.)

APS-C: 55 ° / 46 °
Full frame: 75 ° / 65 °
Hood
PH-S52 (24mm)
Case
Dedicated hard case
Lens Cap
Plastic clip-on
Coating
SMC
Weather Sealing
No
Other Features
Diam x Length
62.5 x 69 mm
Weight
423 g
Production Years
1976 to 1981
Engraved Name
SMC PENTAX 1:2/28 (early variant) or smc PENTAX 1:2 28mm (later variant)
Product Code
22941
Reviews
User reviews
Variants

Two variants were produced. The only difference appears to be in the engraved name:
SMC PENTAX 1:2/28 (early variant),
smc PENTAX 1:2 28mm (later variant)

Features:
Manual FocusAperture RingFull-Frame SupportDiscontinued
Price History:



Add Review of SMC Pentax 28mm F2
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 19
Senior Member

Registered: June, 2016
Location: Paris
Posts: 124

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: March 31, 2023 Recommended | Price: $1,300.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: everything
Cons: nothing
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: k-1 mk2, Fuji gfx, Sony a7s   

What a marvel.
Before 2019, had the chance of owning 2, 1st with fungus, 2nd perfect. Also sold the 2nd to buy the Zeiss Distagon ZK T* 28 F2 for A diaph control.
I finally sold the Zeiss. of course a great brilliant lens . But it had nothing to do with the Pentax / Contax Zeiss previous models. And bought a perfect condition Pentax previously owned by photographer Saul Leiter.
Why ? Because the Pentax version is superior to the T*. Both with zero halo effect on bright areas (actually the sigma ex dg 28 1.8 excels in this area too).
But the bokeh transition and the rendering of the K lens , even with a flat light is outstanding. Isolating subjects at 3-4m away with the K lens if possible and the rendering is amazing . No other 28mm can do that. Isolate your subjects anywhere, cornered or far cornered, it's really sharp enough for huge prints at F2.
Aside from this , well just close the iris down and play with the hyperfocal. Try deep focusing and yes you can shoot scenes like Gregg Toland in Citizen Kane. Crazy results for a 28mm lens on a FF camera.
This lens is unique, it has a real optical soul, if you have the use for it in photography or movie areas, it's worth paying at least half or even more than a recent 2000€ lens. Because it will actually always beat it. Not blew it all away, but it will still beat any other lens in its surrounding focal range.
   
Pentaxian

Registered: April, 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 10,846

6 users found this helpful
Review Date: January 14, 2022 Recommended | Price: $150.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Fantastic build quality, fantastic image quality, sharpness in the centre wide open
Cons: Very big and heavy, sharpness off-centre wide open, difficult to find, cost
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 9    Value: 7    Camera Used: K-3, Fujifilm X-T20, Lumix S5   

I was aware of the legendary status (and cost) of this lens and never thought that I'd ever own one, but I saw one pop up with a K2 and some other gear only a few miles away at a price around a quarter of what it usually goes for. I jumped on the opportunity and was absolutely thrilled to find that the lens was in pristine condition and worked flawlessly.

The lens is huge compared to any other legacy 28mm lens I've used, even the two Vivitar 28mm f/2 lenses, and very heavy. This makes any setup, regardless of camera, quite front-heavy. The build is extremely solid and feels extremely dense and the focus ring is nice and smooth but with a little too much resistance (but still nice to use).

Regarding image quality, this lens is great. Sharpness is extremely impressive wide open in the centre - so much so that I was astonished when I first saw it while pixel-peeping. Outside of the centre (bear in mind this is from APS-C use on a K-3 and a Fujifilm X-T20) it's not so great but still good, General rendering is excellent and images look like they were taken with a much more modern lens, with punchy colour and contrast and an overall modern rendering similar to that from a DA Limited. That's the first time I've ever seen that in a lens as old as the K series. Stopped down a little for landscapes etc the lens is extremely sharp.

Overall on APS-C digital this lens is an extremely good manual fast normal prime. The size and weight are the biggest problems there, with it being much bigger and heavier than my other favourite manual prime around that focal length - the M 35mm f/2. Still, it's much sharper wide open so I can use it at f/2 where I'd use the M 35mm at f/2.8 and if I'm also using film then the K is a "proper" wide-angle rather than the "semi-wide" of the 35mm, so it can save me taking two lenses instead of one. Bokeh is above average for a 28mm lens but not fantastic if you were to compare it to a good fast fifty, but the sharpness and bokeh are plenty good enough to isolate a subject by shooting wide open (which I love to do). Despite being sharp, images are not clinical in appearance and often have that elusive "3D feel" that, for me, is the holy grail of lens performance.

I'm extremely happy with the lens and I don't anticipate selling it any time. If I had paid full market price (around 600 USD / €) then I might think differently, but then for that price, despite my affinity for fine manual lenses, I'd probably have tried a used FA 31mm Limited.

The lens misses out on a 10/10 because of the huge size and weight and the sharpness off-centre wide open, but it may be the best manual lens I've ever used.

Edit 22/02/2023 - Full frame. Now that I've had a chance to use this lens on full-frame digital I can add some notes on that (and some images, see below). On FF the changes are that the lens is now a proper wide-angle and it's ability to isolate subjects is enhanced greatly, which is a real benefit at this focal length. A 28mm f/2.8 would not be able to isolate a sizeable subject (such as a person) with shallow depth of field but the extra stop and being sharp wide open allows that. Handling on a mirrorless camera with metal adapter is very front-heavy, a DSLR would provide more balance.

A size comparison with the two versions of the Vivitar 28mm f/2 lenses:


IMG_4040
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

A 100% crop from the centre of the frame with aperture fully open to show how sharp it is (taken on 24MP APS-C):


Lúa (crop)
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Some shots wide open (APS-C):


Pyjamas
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Fields of balloons
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Fallen blossom
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

And stopped down for landscapes (APS-C):


2021-07-23_04-56-59
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


2021-07-23_04-50-53
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Craggy cliff
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Adding some images taken on full-frame (Panasonic Lumix S5):

Wide open:


Boxhead
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr


Palacio de cristal II
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

f/2.8:


Hungry bird
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr

Wide open or f/2.8:


Stopped at the fence
by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
   
Pentaxian

Registered: July, 2011
Posts: 2,379

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: July 27, 2019 Recommended | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Rendering
Cons: Not fully compatible with new camers
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 4    Value: 9    Camera Used: K1ii   

The Hollywood is very special design based on Pentax/Zeiss cooperation. Large aperture wide angle with quite decent sharpness and great 3D pop. Aperture produces a star with 6 rays - nice.
Handling with green button program and live view focusing is tricky, but you get used to it.
A mint Hollywood costs you as much as new ZK 28. Only the old Zeiss and the old Pentax share the great rendering. Special purpose lens for fun. Sharpness is not as bitingly as D-FA 50, color rendering is different to modern Pentax designs.
   
Junior Member

Registered: November, 2008
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 39
Review Date: June 26, 2018 Recommended | Price: $300.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: sharp, linear, contrasty, smooth focus, rendering
Cons: rare, expensive, heavy
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 8    Camera Used: istDS   

Got this lens at a great price as part of a large package deal. While I haven't tried it on film or FF digial, on crop digital it is amazing.
Gobs of sharpness, contrast, and color saturation. Only drawback is its rare and expensive, but if you can find one at a good price,
jump on it you wont regret it. [url="https://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/index.php?n=55802"][img]
   
Veteran Member

Registered: November, 2009
Location: Strand
Posts: 1,366

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: January 2, 2017 Recommended | Price: $800.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: 3D, wide
Cons: Some what heavy
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 10    Value: 10   

Technical and history:
http://www.marcocavina.com/articoli_fotografici/Pentax_28_2_M/00_pag.htm

Recommend to use on full frame sensor bodies.
An awesome lens!
   
Junior Member

Registered: May, 2016
Posts: 33

4 users found this helpful
Review Date: May 31, 2016 Recommended | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: sharpness, bokeh, colour differentiation
Cons: expensive, big, heavy
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 7    Value: 10    Camera Used: anything between K2 and K-3   

Not much to add here... one of the greatest Pentax lenses ever.
Back in film days pictures taken with this lens on fine grain material generally looked like medium format. It was a step ahead of any other wide angle lens. Modern lenses with their aggressive micro contrast will easily let you think they are better. But no, go to the pixel level and you will see the 2/28 has it all even today. Add its dreamy bokeh, its incredible ability to diffentiate colour shades, its perfectly laid-back slightly greyish colour rendering... and you're done and addicted
On the K-3 I actually mostly use it for video shooting. AF is not needed, instead you are thrilled by the large, smooth, super-silent focus ring... Leave the aperture wide open and play with the pretty small DOF. You get razor-sharp, movie-like pictures with a beautiful stress-free creamy background.
   
Moderator
Site Supporter

Registered: June, 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Posts: 17,377
Review Date: April 1, 2015 Recommended | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Excellent performance and fast
Cons:
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 9   

Contrary to what the description says, this lens was NOT produced as an M or A series. Those lenses are completely different optically. They are also more compact.

This lens is a jewel performance wise and speed wise. I think it is the best 28mm or 35mm manual focus lens Asahi Optical/Pentax ever made. This lens is good to pair with the K50/1.2 or A50/1.2.
   
New Member

Registered: December, 2014
Location: Samara
Posts: 3

4 users found this helpful
Review Date: December 6, 2014 Recommended | Price: $750.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Fast, sharp, colour, contrast, low distortion, low CA
Cons: Rare lens, rare original hood.
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 9    Camera Used: K-5   

1) Excellent sharpness, starting with an open aperture, focusing on all bands from the MDF to infinity. I was particularly struck by the high detail in the "infinity".

2) Almost no chromatic aberration at any aperture. Even at full aperture in the contrasting image areas CA can only be seen under high magnification (very slight purple fringing, and then not always).

3) Good holds backlight (including the open - especially tried), a side appear highly visible illumination and glare. Hood needed. Unfortunately, with my purchase when not supplied: ((((clip-on hood: PH-S52 wide angle) Can someone tell me where to find the original? I would greatly appreciate ...

4) Excellent color rendition and contrast (around 43 Limited Pentax (which for some reason is immediately asked for a comparison) only wider angle). 3D-images (lightness, transparency (like the pictures Voigtlander APO lanthar 125mm), volume - only words can not convey) when shooting at close range.

5) I do not know how to FF, not is vignetting.

6) Geometric distortion is, but insignificant for such a focus (at least for me )).

7) excellent bokeh - so far only good impressions (uniform Gaussian blur, calm, do not strain)

8) Weight: 420 g, which is pretty hard for wide angle lens for K version (and other versions, too). Not easy ... but not heavy. In conjunction with the Pentax K-5 is quite a nothing. Very convenient to use. The focusing ring is very broad, the course of about 90 degrees.

9) The aperture value half-stop, only after F16 immediately follows F22. Aperture 16 and 22 as workers (currently significant flaws did not see)

10) MDF of 25 cm.

11) Tactile sensations - and they had not been canceled ))

Weaknesses:

There are disadvantages as well as without them ...

1) It is very rare and expensive, comparable in price with the Zeiss 28/2 ZK (although a little !!! less at the present moment, and in fact the lens end of the 70s). However, after seeing it on Ebay (quite by accident), without hesitation bought and while I do not regret.

2) A short course of the focus ring (90 degrees), but it used to (before similar wide angle lens was not). At close range is not convenient to use (of course, this applies to the aperture open and close to them), especially in dynamic shooting (these are children in the first place, and of all sorts of pets).

3) Shooting mode only M, the focus at full aperture, metering by clicking the "green" button (Pentax K-5) is calculated on the Aperture installed on the ring at the time of the shooting aperture closes to working. Those that are closer to infinity - no problem - aperture 8-11 and the focus ring to the end position and go!).

4) Blend - well, really need. I would like to the original, but hard to find.

5) This was originally planned to take Zeiss 28/2 ZK (new), and he has nine petals and auto iris (with the ability to shoot in aperture priority and with a record of its value in the Exif file + outbreak in the machine). We Pentax K 28/2 only 6 aperture blades and there is no provision And Nevertheless, the difference between 6 and 9 petals in bokeh do not see (compare test shots from the Internet). Only the lights during night shooting 6-rays here until all the difference ..

comment:

Originally formed an ambiguous impression .. Quite peculiar lens (although objectively)), does not compare with anything - before I wide angle lens fixes were not, well, just Summilux-R 35). For its size pretty big for wide angle lens (closer rather to telephoto), but, nevertheless, still compact at the same time on the body Pentax K-5 (here's the paradox!), comparable with the whale 18-55 in length, even a little shorter. The picture on the MDF and is very close to bulk, beautiful, air, free from any defects. Distortion is only visible to specific images. In landscapes have not tried - the weather is not very much and have nothing to shoot.


P.S. Sorry for my english)
P.P.S. Must have !
   
Veteran Member

Registered: June, 2013
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,954

3 users found this helpful
Review Date: June 21, 2014 Recommended | Price: $850.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: sharpness, colour, contrast, low aberrations
Cons: none
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: K5   

OK I have rated this lens a 10 and some say no lens can be rated that high. According to the pentaxforums guide this means the lens is supernatural - well I can't say it isn't.

It is fully manual being a K series lens. So green button metering required. Minor inconvenience but necessary for legendary legacy glass.

Colours are simply unbelievable. Beautiful saturation and hue, it is as you see it with a touch of additional vibrance. Contrast is excellent but a hood is required. You will suffer significantly reduced contrast if the hood is missing - again a minor annoyance. Sharpness is simply stunning, especially in the sweet spot between f8 and f11. Aberrations are very well controlled - never bothered me yet. Bokeh is as expected for a zeiss like lens. Handling ...... some say it is heavy ...... I say it balances the body perfectly. Focusing is buttery smooth and precise just like a Takumar ....... oooh and aren't they are nice to focus.

Price. Well what do you pay for a Zeiss 2/28 nowdays? Should we complain with the average prices paid? I think not.

This is legacy glass and does not have the new and improved coatings and ED glass. If it did then I guess I would be scoring the lens an 11 - but here I think we are talking 1%ers that cannot be discerned without pixel peeking.

I am extremely happy to have a copy of this lens. I simply cannot wait to try this on a FF camera. I will post some additional images when I do.





EDIT: More testing required after getting a copy of the FA31mm Limited. Comparisons between the two were inevitable. Early results show my K2/28 review to be correct with this lens being sharper and superior in CA PF and better bokeh. Colours and contrast between the two lenses are very similar.
   
Site Supporter

Registered: November, 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,223

2 users found this helpful
Review Date: February 6, 2014 Recommended | Price: $500.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Sharpness wide open, wonderful IQ, Zeiss Quality, Pentax Construction
Cons: A bit heavy and big, need to stop down with green button
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: K-5   

Pentax 28mm f2 + Pentax K-3 by Palenquero, on Flickr


PentaxK28mmf2-Lipitor-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr


PentaxK28mmf2-UnionStation1-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr


PentaxK28mmf2-Copon1-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr


----------------

January 15, 2015 Update

I sold this wonderful lens because I had another 28/2 lens almost if not as good, the Kiron PK 28/2. I have it in the Kiron, Vivitar versions, and it is good. Here is a sample of a shot with the Kiron PK. :

Kiron-PK-28mmf2-Copon-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
   
Pentaxian

Registered: March, 2010
Location: Chiang Mai, Bologna, Amsterdam
Posts: 1,198

3 users found this helpful
Review Date: June 3, 2012 Recommended | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: IQ at close range and infinity, prestige
Cons: weight, size
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 9    Value: 10    Camera Used: LX, MX, K2   

The average price is quite low, considering the prices of other Pentax primes, after the launch of the last waves of high performance Pentax digital bodies.
This is one of the most extraordinary Pentax lenses ever sold! Come on!
I'd buy one for > 500 USD, if i weren't so lucky to find one for a nice price, LOONG time ago, probably sold by some silly fashion victim looking for the (then new) small "M" lenses.
I did the opposite, i sold my new 28 f/3.5 M, to get a faster lens. I was young and ignorant, totally oblivious of the noble origins of the lens and of its technical peculiarities. Fortunately i was already interested in funny looking photographic equipments, so i couldn't pass a 28mm wide angle looking like a 100mm tele... despite the cost, which was higher than any other Pentax second hand wide angle.
Many years later i learned that my 28mm f/2 was the first Pentax lens with floating elements, and that it was actually a Zeiss lens.
As correctly pointed out in the previous review, it was the only result of the short collaboration between Pentax and Zeiss to actually hit the market.
BTW, Pentax didn't have the technology at the time to calculate a wide prime with that optical layout, with floating elements that adjust the correction of the objective at different reproduction ratios (focusing distances).
Soon after the launch of the 28mm, Zeiss came to an agreement with Yashica/Kyocera, which of course ended the collaboration with Pentax, and started the modern Contax line.
It is unsure if the lenses came from Germany already coated, or to be processed with the famous seven layers SMC coating.
Whatever the truth, it makes little difference, as both SMC and T* coatings are super good!
What is certain, is that the Pentax 28mm f/2 is optically the same thing as the Zeiss Distagon 28mm f/2 for the Contax. The differences are pure aesthetics.
I decided to write my own review to point out that simple fact.
No need to waste any more words about optical quality. Just do a Google search for the Distagon almost mythical qualities...

One small caveat:
i haven't used this lens with digital bodies, hence i can't report about its digital performance.
It's a pity, i know.
I use DSLR bodies for travel photography, in situations with a certain amount of risk of theft/damage.
Probably i am too scared to bring my best prime lenses with me, i'd feel too bad if my lens bag gets stolen :-)
BTW, if i had to bring a few primes for a long trip abroad, i wouldn't choose an old wide angle.
The 85mm f/1.4 and 200mm f/2.8 would be much better candidates.

Anyway, if you find one of these scarce 28mm lenses, just buy it, you can't go wrong!
Just pray for a full frame digital Pentax, it would make your lens even more desiderable.

cheers

CJ
   
Inactive Account

Registered: April, 2009
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 48

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: February 25, 2012 Recommended | Price: $600.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: build quality, sharpness, virtually distortion free
Cons: none
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: K5   

just a jem of a lens !, build quality is great, sharpness is great. CLICK ONTO IMAGE TO ENLARGE. All shot with K5 and K 28/2 ( first version )
   
Pentaxian

Registered: September, 2010
Location: Lyon area, France
Posts: 712

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: January 19, 2012 Recommended | Price: $200.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: High quality
Cons: Usual prices; quite big and heavy
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 3   

I got a very good deal on this lens.
I feel that yes, it is quite excellent optically, but also quite over-rated... Its rarity leads to current used prices that (to me) do not reflect the actual value of this lens.
I found it also too big and heavy for something that should be a standard prime (just compare to the M/A versions!). All in all I sold it (at quite a profit) mainly because I didn't think it mas worth its market price.
   
Inactive Account

Registered: August, 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 7,484

1 user found this helpful
Review Date: February 26, 2011 Recommended | Price: $525.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Fast and sharp throughout its range.
Cons: None.
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10   

Wow! Just plain Wow.. I had hoped when I paid what I did for a 28mm lens, that it would be all it was cracked up to be. I must say that it did not disappoint. The designers of this lens really knew what they were doing and it does its share to add to the K lens reputation. I spent a whole month with this lens glued (figuratively) to my K5. In spite of its size, it actually felt very well balanced on that camera. The build quality is superb and focusing with it is silky smooth. From close range to infinity this lens is sharp. It passes my CA torture tests with flying colors, or rather colorless. The color replication is dead on from what I can see (subjective because WB can affect the outcome).



Bokeh, what can I say. Smoooth.



General use.. If you can't get it with this lens, you aren't trying hard enough.



You can see more here.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rolleiman2007/sets/72157625130621753/detail/

   
Veteran Member

Registered: March, 2009
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 509
Review Date: February 19, 2011 Recommended | Price: $550.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: well built, background blurr, color, IMQ
Cons: pretty big and expensive
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 9    Value: 7   

Very well built. Focusing ring feels a bit different from other K lenses, perhaps due to its unique optical design.

Resolution is very high. Color is great. But I am not sure how it is compared with the famed 31mm limited. It seems to fare better than my K35 f2. A bit longer, perhaps the longest among 100mm and below. It is physically longer than my K85 f1.8. It is not always easy to get the right focus in low light when it is supposed to shine. Perhaps it will work better with the full frame.

Wonderful lens all in all. But I am not sure if it is worth the price I paid. Perhaps, it is more of a collector's item. The most expensive lens in my collection so far... It is so expensive that it has not see much daylight...
Add Review of SMC Pentax 28mm F2



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top