| Author: | | New Member Registered: June, 2018 Posts: 2 | | Lens Review Date: March 7, 2020 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $105.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Small, contrasty, and sharp all over by f/8. | | Cons: | Spherical Aberrations at f/2.8, coma correction | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: MX, X-T3
| |
Prices of 35mm lenses have blown up over the last few years, so I was super enthused when I found this one in good condition for just over $100.
Wide open shows the worst of this lenses performance, there's coma at the edges/corners and spherical aberrations that rob the image of contrast and resolution. However once you close the aperture to f/4 the image improves dramatically - spherical aberrations disappear, coma is noticeably reduced, and there's TONS of contrast and good resolution. At f/8 the image is really sharp across the entire frame.
Compared to the older f/3.5 35mm lenses, this M version has better edge/corner sharpness, better flare resistance, slightly lower chromatic aberrations, and an extra 2/3 EV of brightness at max aperture. The only area where the older 35mm outperforms this one is wide-open performance at f/3.5 - no spherical aberrations and super sharp/contrasty in the center, however if you stop the M lens down to f/4 it outperforms the older versions in the mid-frame and edges. This f/2.8 version has warmer tones similar to the f/3.5 35mm SMC Takumar lens. I personally prefer this f/2.8 version over the f/3.5 versions.
My copy has a very tiny amount of haze under the front element, but it's only visible when shining light through the back - something that will never happen in real-world use.
| | | | | | | New Member Registered: March, 2019 Posts: 2
1 user found this helpful
| | Lens Review Date: June 17, 2019 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $75.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | size, build quality, sharpness, ease of use | | Cons: | maybe a little flat at f8 and f11 | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 10
Value: 9
Camera Used: Sony a6000
| |
This is my third m prime lens after the 28mm f2.8 and the 50mm f1.7. I love these lenses for their small size and quality and the 35mm f2.8 is no exception. My copy is in great condition and came with the original front and rear lens caps. The colours out of the lens are lovely, warm and nicely saturated. On the crop sensor the field of view is a little tighter than I would hope but it is still a great walk around lens. The lens works equally well with the camera in both black and white and colour settings; this is definitely a step up from the 28mm which I feel performs better in black and white.
| | | | | Forum Member Registered: February, 2016 Location: Moab, Utah Posts: 90
9 users found this helpful
| | Lens Review Date: February 10, 2018 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $180.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Sharpness, contrast, 3d pop, closest focusing, flare resistance, distortion control | | Cons: | aperture design not great - spring too weak | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Sony a7ii, a7s
| |
This might be the best all around 35mm that Pentax has ever made. It performs in all areas with no real drawbacks optically. It's very underrated in my opinion on this forum and elsewhere. The close focusing distance of 30cm really shows in the bokeh that it can produce. That's 5cm closer than most f2 35mm lenses and it helps it compare bokeh-wise to faster leses. Yet, there is not a lot of glass inside. The elements are small and few and light transmission is excellent. This makes a great night landscape lens and in my opinion, the best all-around 35mm one can own. Typically, the f-stops are slow to retract because of a weak spring design, but does not bother me for my purposes.
I also have and have compared in detail, this lens to the Takumar 35mm f4, Auto-Takumar 35mm f2.3, the S-M-C Takumar 35mm f3.5, SMC K 35mm f2, and FA 35mm f2. For anyone curious and wanting to compare, see my video for a comprehensive review with examples.
| | | | | Pentaxian Registered: April, 2009 Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 6,630 | | Lens Review Date: October 3, 2015 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $50.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Small, sharp, nice bokeh | | Cons: | Not really sharp wide open | |
I bought this lens because I wanted a smaller, cheaper version of the f/2 which I already have. I snapped it up when I saw one for a good price as they're quite rare (28mm lenses were far more common). It's not fabulously sharp wide open but it's very good, and extremely sharp by f4.5. There is some noticeable chromatic aberration wide open in out-of-focus areas.
Despite it's slight IQ faults, I really like the lens - the handling somehow seems even better than usual for an M series, making it a pleasure to use. Bokeh is far smoother than is normal for a lens of this age. Colour and contrast are good and images have a vibrancy that I love. This lens shouldn't be seen as the poor, slower cousin of the f/2 version but a lens that's a pleasure to own and use in it's own right. It's certainly superior to any of the much more common M series 28mm lenses (with the possible exception of the f/2, which I haven't used).
I'm very happy with this little lens, it has quickly become a favourite on my K3 and also on my Fuji X-M1.
A few samples:
Fountain by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
Autumn by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
IMGP5833a by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
IMGP5792a by Jonathan MacDonald, on Flickr
| | | | | | | New Member Registered: August, 2014 Location: Jakarta Posts: 1 | | Lens Review Date: September 4, 2014 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $40.00
| Rating: 7 |
| Pros: | Cheap, Reliable | | Cons: | Take a bit time to focusing | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 5
Handling: 8
Value: 6
Camera Used: Pentax ME Super, Pentax MZ-50
| |
This is the first lens I have.
What can I say? Hard, strong, reliable, sharp... Its SMC class. You can use this to train your "feel" with manual focusing.
Here is a picture that I take with this lens, using ME Super and BW-film Lucky SHD100.
 | | | | | New Member Registered: May, 2013 Location: Jakarta Posts: 2 | | Lens Review Date: May 11, 2014 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $65.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | sharp, color saturation, compact | | Cons: | bokeh | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: K5, ME Super
| |
i have one with scratch and cleaning mark on back element, it didn't affect image quality, color saturation still excellent
here the sample image, the primate were have been in glass cage, close focused shot, taken at zoo in Jakarta, Indonesia, really like this lens
ISO 200, 1/160 sec, no retouch, resize only, autolevel only:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/roe_groho/11905766436/in/photostream/
here are for more samples pics:
http://https://www.flickr.com/photos/roe_groho/sets/72157645671773578/ | | | | | New Member Registered: January, 2012 Posts: 15 | | Lens Review Date: June 20, 2013 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $36.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, Size & weight & appearance, contrast, simple construction & robust | | Cons: | Have to more sharp at frame area | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: K10D
| |
All about this lens is very good.
f2.8-f5.6 have to more sharp at frame area, over f8 is perfect!
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: April, 2010 Location: Wiltshire/Hampshire Posts: 1,760 | | Lens Review Date: May 28, 2013 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: N/A
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, compact, great handling | | Cons: | Not a lot | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: LX, ME, K5
| |
I think the 5 rating really is not right, and drags the average down.
This is a hidden gem in the M-line. Sharp in the centre from wide-open, razor sharp at f/4 in the centre. Great across the frame by f/5.6 on a crop-sensor. Also a great lens on film, but takes f/8 to sharpen up across the frame.
Fantastic value, as mentioned before similar sharpness to the fast-fifties.
See https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/lens-sample-photo-archive/226252-super-mu...ml#post2401178 for a full test including 100% samples.
| | | | | New Member Registered: April, 2013 Posts: 1 | | Lens Review Date: April 21, 2013 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $100.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Small size , optics and helicoid very good | | Cons: | No | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Camera Used: KM , ME
| |
I have the M-2.8/28 mm and the M-2.8/35 mm . At short distance untill 5 metre's there is not much difference between the two lenses , but if you do a landscape the M-2.8/35 mm is a real winner . At 1:5.6 even the far corners of the 35 mm negative are very sharp , so this 35 mm is very usefull lens for handheld photography with a 100 iso black and white film and a orange filter . It is a great lens .
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: November, 2012 Posts: 124
1 user found this helpful
| | Lens Review Date: March 21, 2013 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $30.00
| Rating: 7 |
| Pros: | Size, build quality, sharpness, color rendition | | Cons: | long focus throw | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 5
Handling: 3
Value: 6
Camera Used: k20d
| |
This is my best lens, i got this lens because of the "equivalent" to 50mm, but that's a load of lies
it has nothing to do with a real 50mm, even if i use my 50mm @ f2.8
i honestly dont know why people say "if you want a real 50mm on a crop sensor, you should get a 35'mil!
another think it has nothing to do with a 50mm is the focus throw, since it's a manual lens you'll be using the focus ring alot (...) in the 50mm it goes like ...
50mm /0.45 /0.5 /0.55 /0.6 /0.7 /0.85 /1 /1.2 /1.6 /2 /3 /5 /15 /*infinity
35mm /0.3 /0.35 /0.4 /0.5 /0.6 /0.8 /1 /1.3 /2 /4.5 /*infinity
you can see it skips from 4.5 to infinity unlike a real 50mm.
so if you want to get a 35mm for the "50mm feel" do not get this or any other 35mm lens
i got it as an extra when i went to buy my smc-m 50mm f1.4
The sir who sold me the lens was needing money and he kindly sold me the lens for 25eur along with the 50mm for 50eur
i really didn't want this lens, i just wanted a faster 50mm as i was getting tired of my smc-a 50mm f2.0
(i do ALOT of street night photography)
but in a sense i thank those people that said to get a 35mm to replace the fullframe 50mm, if it weren't for them i would have never came across this beauty, i use this lens more in daylight than i use anyother lens
from f5.6 to f8 this lens is so amazing, i never seen anything like it, even the 50mm doesn't give me such good pictures. this lens came riddled with the aperture blades problem, but nothing to hard to fix
came with original box and lens covers.
i honestly can't imagine how a famous FA limited or any STAR lens work since this is the best thing i've ever seen
(no pentax users around here to meet and test lens on my camera, im all alone eh!)
picture of the lens in its original leather case (click for fullsize)
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/16/prf9683.jpg/
picture of lens case top cover, reads SMC PENTAX 2.8/35 (click for fullsize)
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/prf9680.jpg/
One of the many beautiful photographs i did with this lens (click for fullsize)
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/707/ceuplazaigp5758.png/
posted here in the pet gallery, the bokeh is only usuable up close, but you dont want people shot's at this distance, they look weird and bloated in comparsion to the 50 mil
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/551585_382908328469423_1117544088_n.jpg | | | | | Senior Member Registered: September, 2010 Location: Lyon area Posts: 205
1 user found this helpful
| | Lens Review Date: November 20, 2012 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $50.00
| Rating: 7 |
| Pros: | Small, good FL both for 24x36 and APS-C | | Cons: | Flares a bit | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 5
Handling: 10
Value: 9
Camera Used: MX, LX, K-5
| |
I got this lens as part of a lot. My copy is in good condition, except for a dent in the filter thread.
This is a nice performer, and I say that after having sold my DA 35mm Limited. Compared to it, of course:
- less contrast, more prone to flare
- less sharp when focusing on closer subjects
- no macro ability (!) 
But, when focused on infinity or hyperfocal, this little cheapie holds its own very well! In practice I have a hard time seeing any difference at all in these conditions.
To sum things up, this is THE lens to get if you're on a budget and want a 30-35mm prime for general purposes.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: April, 2012 Location: Sydney Posts: 1,182 | | Lens Review Date: September 14, 2012 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $60.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | that magical fov in crop land | | Cons: | zilch | |
LOVE IT!!!
I kind of collected this just because I had the 28 M, and a 50 M at either end, turns out the (on a crop) the 50 feels to portraity, and the 28 a little fickle to focus. (Slowly developing a lens collecting persuasion here..)
Can't explain it, why the 28mm feels fickle that is, but in regards for general use, the 35mm just feels good.
I suppose it's having started with a 50mm on film, the 35mm covers the same amount of area so here I am in familiar territory
Can't fault it wide open, out of focus areas are clean, its a ripper  | | | | | Inactive Account Registered: September, 2011 Posts: 6 | | Lens Review Date: June 27, 2012 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: $150.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | sharpness, contrasty, great on film | | Cons: | none | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-r
| |
Optically identically to the acclaimed A35/2.8. The difference in review score here may just be a matter of sample variations.
I must have a pretty darn good copy of the lens. It's contrasty wide open with excellent sharpness across the frame. Comparable to M50 1.7 in terms of sharpness. It's close to a normal lens, a little bit on the long side, when used on APS-C. Mounted on a film camera, it becomes a wide angle lens. I prefer the FoV it delivers on film more than APS-C. Something to consider if you are also a film shooter.
I've not seen this lens on sale often. The M28s are a lot more common in the used market.
| | | | | Site Supporter Registered: July, 2008 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Posts: 3,948 | | Lens Review Date: July 23, 2011 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: N/A
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Small sharp and the right focal length | | Cons: | None really | |
This is another one of Pentax's excellent 35mm offerings. On digital it has an appealing focal length, and withthe coatings and general design excels at sharp images wide open and 1 stop down we are into ultra-sharp. Contrast is very good and the size is terrific....very small.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: February, 2010 Location: Rotterdam, NL Posts: 737 | | Lens Review Date: January 22, 2011 | I can recommend this lens: Yes |
Price: N/A
| Rating: 7 |
| Pros: | light, small, versatile, attractive FoV | | Cons: | not too sharp, some distortion | |
I used this lens for over 20 years as my main optics. I also used the 2/85mm, but for specific purposes, and while I had the 4/200mm, I rarely used that focal length (all on film).
The field of view is attractive (on film or FF), and the lens is very versatile. I did not have the money for the 1.4 or even 2.0/35mm at the time, although I later acquired the latter as well. Nonetheless, it served its purpose, but in retrospect I can see that it did not shine as some Pentax lenses do. It certainly doesn’t have the wow factor. Not in sharpness, colour rendition, or boqeh.
Mechanically, it has been flawless. Very sturdy and unlikely to give up any time soon, such is the built quality. Yet I would search for another 35mm were I in the market for one today. I'm not, as I now have the Pentax 645-A 3.5/35mm, which is lightyears ahead.
| | |
;)
;)
