Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Pentax Lens Review Database » Film Era Pentax K-Mount Lenses » M Zoom Lenses
SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4 Review RSS Feed

SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4

Sharpness 
 8.0
Aberrations 
 7.9
Bokeh 
 7.6
Handling 
 7.7
Value 
 8.7
Reviews Views Date of last review
19 94,979 Sun September 30, 2018
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
84% of reviewers $45.13 7.21
SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4

SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4
supersize
SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4
supersize

Description:
The M-series 40-80mm has a unique focal length range among all Pentax zooms. It offers a macro mode at 80mm.

SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4
© www.pentaxforums.com, sharable with attribution
Image Format
Full-frame / 35mm film
Lens Mount
Pentax K
Aperture Ring
Yes (no A setting)
Diaphragm
Automatic, 7 blades
Optics
7 elements, 7 groups
Mount Variant
K
Check camera compatibility
Max. Aperture
F2.8-4
Min. Aperture
F22-32
Focusing
Manual
Min. Focus
120 cm
Max. Magnification
Filter Size
49 mm
Internal Focus
No
Field of View (Diag. / Horiz.)

APS-C: 40-20 ° / 33-17 °
Full frame: 57-30 ° / 48-25 °
Hood
RH-R49
Case
Dedicated hard case
Lens Cap
Plastic clip-on
Coating
SMC
Weather Sealing
No
Other Features
Diam x Length
66 x 76 mm
Weight
395 g
Production Years
1980 to 1984
Engraved Name
smc PENTAX-M ZOOM 1:2.8-4 40-80mm
Product Code
27867
Reviews
User reviews
Notes
Macro setting at the long end
Features:
Manual FocusAperture RingFull-Frame SupportDiscontinued
Price History:



Add Review of SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 19
New Member

Registered: March, 2013
Location: Highlands, Scotland
Posts: 3
Lens Review Date: September 30, 2018 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $20.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Quirky focal length, cheap, Pentax.
Cons: Very ugly compared to most M series lenses! Lacks built in hood.
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 10    Camera Used: KP   

An interesting but very ugly lens! Probably doesn't get the praise it deserves. Well made, but can be prone to the zoom ring becoming sloppy. I have found colour and sharpness up there with many of its fellow M series lenses. Worth having if you find a good example, if only because of the odd zoom range (I think that's the collector in me!). Pity it doesn't have the built in hood of other M zooms/teles.
   
Junior Member

Registered: July, 2014
Posts: 42
Lens Review Date: March 21, 2016 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $30.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: solid, IQ, portrait, product photography, f2.8
Cons:
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 9    Value: 10    Camera Used: K-50   

40mm to 80mm - pretty good range on a DSLR for head/body shots or small/medium product photography. You can be as close as 16-18 inches by my estimation and have the optical physics benefits of a long lens. Plus you have the flexibility of a ZOOM when the model moves around or the items change size when doing a set of products in a shoot.

Other than that, the open aperature, solid M-quality build, and Pentax IQ are always a plus. recommended.

at 60mm


at 80mm


   
New Member

Registered: March, 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 13
Lens Review Date: August 3, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Image quality, contrast, sharpness, solid build
Cons: distortion and CA change with focal lenth and aperture
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 7    Value: 8   

I have used this lens since 1985, primarily with Kodachrome 64 and ME Super. It works well with my K-500 digital.

Hand held, 80mm, f5.6, 1/25 sec, ISO 500, late afternoon shade, back-lit by open blue sky.


Route 66, Round Barn - a Mother Road icon
   
Veteran Member

Registered: November, 2013
Posts: 1,573

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: April 16, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: cheap, light
Cons: not sharp
Sharpness: 6    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 9    Value: 9    Camera Used: MX   

The Pentax M40-80 f2.8-4 is one of the many so called "standard zooms" that were sold in the 80s as replacement for prime 50-55 mm lenses and sold as kits for amateurs. This one came with a beaten MX and is beaten up accordingly,

As all the other siblings it was supposed to do too many things (50 mm replacement, wide angle, short tele, macro) and to be as cheap as possible, so in reality it doesn't do anything quite right, but like many M lenses is very small (unlike other standard zooms of the era) and light, so it can be see limited use for street photography.





   
Site Supporter

Registered: April, 2011
Location: Lost in translation ...
Posts: 17,289
Lens Review Date: October 2, 2014 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: Good IQ & color possible, range, solid build for my copy ...
Cons: Not a "macro" @ 1:4, MFD, needs stopping down ...
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 8    Value: 7    Camera Used: K-5, K-r   

Bonjour,

This is a lens that may deserve more credit than it gets. Just look at the images by unartist; not bad at alI.

I gave an "7" overall rating which is may be unkind, but it's not an"8" ... wish that there were half points possible.

For a lower tier zoom (IMHO), this M lens does quite well. It can produce nice images stopped down. I am a bit irked that this lens would labeled as a "macro" with only a "1:4" ratio ... come on, get real Pentax.

My copy is solid and well built, but I find it odd that there are two different ring grip patterns used ... small rectangles for the focus ring and long linear line for the zoom ring ... how odd and never noticed this upon another Pentax lens; maybe it's just me.

Some sample images maybe later on ... Salut, J
   
New Member

Registered: May, 2013
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 2
Lens Review Date: May 2, 2014 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $80.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: color contrast, IQ, built quality
Cons: push pull zoom, heavy, relatively rare
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 7    Value: 7    Camera Used: K5   

I had this lens twice, i'm not sure for the first lens, it's sold
latest i have the second one, it is surely I have the good copy, with perfect coating, how lucky I am!
really like this lens, although a little awkward when shooting macro, here are the sample shot in wide open (F2.8), ISO100, no post processing, RAW to JPEG convert:
   
Site Supporter

Registered: January, 2013
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 146
Lens Review Date: March 21, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Sharp, Cheap, Good Color
Cons: Heavy.
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 6    Value: 9    Camera Used: K-5, K10D   

Nice lens for Macro job and Portrait. Doesn't seem to be possible to put on other uses.
Good sharpness and color.
   
New Member

Registered: September, 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 13

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: September 8, 2012 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Cheap
Cons: Heavy
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 8    Value: 10    Camera Used: K200D, ME Super   

Nice walk around lens on a film camera. Great portrait lens on a digital. Seems to take great pictures for me.
   
Inactive Account

Registered: October, 2010
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,542

4 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: April 19, 2012 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $50.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Compact Focal Range
Cons: Soft at the Wide End, Minimum Focus Distance
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 7    Value: 8   

I find the Zoom Range of this little lens quite attractive but it's physical build, though typical M construction, is a bit ugly. With that said, I would probably never give up or sell this lens.

I have found the strength of this lens is from @ 50mm - 80mm one stop down. Macro is a bonus surprise, better than OK if you treat it like a macro, i.e. use a tripod. Wide open on the 40mm end, is soft, kind of like a soft focus portrait lens, one needs to stop down at least 2 stops before images become workably sharp. But wide open, on the 60-80mm or Macro end it's quite usable and simply stopped down one or two stops and accurately focused, this lens will deliver. My biggest problem is minimum focusing distance is 4 feet, which takes away a lot of photo options but the macro mode almost makes up for it...

If you know how to work and enjoy an M lens, you might like this lens, but be warned, it's not for the faint at heart

I think it's a 71/2 lens, I'll give it an 8 to bring it up a little...

Macro Mode 1 Stop Down Hand Held

Macro Mode by theunartist, on Flickr

@ 50mm 2 Stops Down

Contemplating 'Dog Days' by theunartist, on Flickr
   
Forum Member

Registered: March, 2010
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 83

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: December 7, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Useful 60~120 zoom range on digital; effective 'macro'; decent build quality
Cons: Fairly heavy

I have few complaints about this lens, which I bought new 25 years ago. It is no more difficult to handle than any other two-touch zoom and the push-pull macro function is a doddle. Surprisingly, under the skin it's optically similar to the one-touch 35~70/f2.8-3.5, both are 7/7 construction. The rugged build is reassuring and it still looks and feels good after service on an MX and ME-F, and occasionally on digital.

I don't shoot wide open on principle so softness and CA are rarely a worry. For digital this 40~80 is a useful walkabout lens with a 120mm reach. As with all M-series I find it works best on my old *istDS where the 'green'/AE-L button is perfectly placed under the right thumb for rapid metering when aperture values change while zooming. It's not so quick on the K-r and K-7 because the 'green' button is awkwardly positioned and not so user-friendly.

No IQ issues when stopped down a tad. There are certain subjects for which a 60~120 lens is ideal, so I wouldn't part with mine.
   
Senior Member

Registered: December, 2006
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 229
Lens Review Date: June 5, 2011 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: $75.00 | Rating: 5 

 
Pros: Cheap
Cons: IQ, size, handling

I believe this was a "cheap" alternative to the 35-70M and it behaves like it!

IQ wide open is poor and it takes a while before it inproves. It is bulky for it's range and the 2 ring operation makes it slow to use. This is doubl so unless you are using an auto mode because it loses nearly a whole stop from one end to the other.

It does have a macro facility but with the IQ, it's not something I would use. I bought mine new in a clearance sale 25 years ago and it still looks new because it never gets used. the 35-70M on the other hand looks well worn

Kim
   
Inactive Account

Registered: August, 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 161

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: May 24, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $40.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: old smc pentax colors
Cons: bokeh, minimum focus

Maybe I got very lucky with my copy, but I'm totally dumbfounded by the ability of this lens. For general street photography, this lens can deliver, and deliver big.

The only real minus with this lens is that under certain conditions the bokeh can be somewhat harsh.
   
Pentaxian

Registered: October, 2010
Posts: 3,639
Lens Review Date: December 20, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: cheap, nice bokeh.
Cons: image quality average. bulky.
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 8    Value: 9   

Review smc 1:2.8-4 M 40-80 mm/macro.


Good oldie zoom lens. Can deliver very nice pictures. This was my first lens wich came with ME-Super. With film you could really use this lens on it's own potential. Now with 1.6 X crop it looses some versality at wide end and it is also restricting that closest focus point is 0.8 meters(as it was with film). But macro feature gives relief to this need. With macro you can get as close as 32 cm from your subject. It gives quite good effect on pictures. But you can't really call it as a true macro, IMO. But it increases versality of this lens.

Colour is quite neutral with this lens, and some how bokeh is soft and nice too. But, when it is used at 80 mm/f 4 as wide open it is not bokeh monster, but with macro feat it serves you nicelly when there in enough light. Sharpness and rendering is average as one can hope to be as consumer grade lens from -70's especially, when compared to smc M 50 1 :1.4. Wich is by the way, very nice lens.

Handling is easy and especially if you like this range it can give some suprises, image wise. It is well build no flopping or anything like that. , aperture ring snaps exactly on it's place. Easy to focus and zoom. All seems to be on it's place. But nothing really shines on exellense.

All that said, this lens still finds it self on my camera every now and then, even there is nice automatical zooms available. This is individual thing, but I just like way manual lenses feels when using them. Maybe I should use automatics more and so, to get used to it more, maybe. What would make this lens more attractive would be auto aperture, better rendering and ability to focus closer. When there is good light, you can achieve nice results. But up to it's limitations. (Non working link removed)

Edit: had to rice my rating...for it's price it is quite good...
   
Junior Member

Registered: April, 2008
Location: Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire, UK.
Posts: 37

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: October 9, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $10.00 | Rating: 6 

 
Pros: Chunky well-built lens. Nice bokeh. Cheap.
Cons: Macro focusing iffy. Purple fringing when wide open.

These are very cheap on e-bay. They are quirky and work best from f4 to f16. Not the best Pentax lens. As others have said recognise its limits.
   
Site Supporter

Registered: February, 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 1,846
Lens Review Date: August 16, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $20.00 | Rating: 5 

 
Pros: Cheap, solid build, macro focusing, a cheap way to try out 2.8 glass
Cons: purple fringing on everything

I really expected this lens to perform better wide open than it did. If you use it in moderate light conditions, it works out ok, but keep it away from bright light sources or you'll need to stop down substantially.

The focus on this lens is nicely dampened, the macro focusing by pulling the lens out is budget, but functional.

The color rendition wasn't what I've come to expect from Pentax gear.

Overall this lens is ok. I got it as part of a deal with a bunch of other lenses. If you're looking for inexpensive gear, it's not a bad option, but you'll have to play with it to learn its limitations.
Add Review of SMC Pentax-M 40-80mm F2.8-4



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top