Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Pentax Lens Review Database » Digital Era Pentax K-Mount Lenses » DA Zoom Lenses
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE Review RSS Feed

HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE

Reviews Views Date of last review
7 49,493 Thu July 19, 2018
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
57% of reviewers $101.25 7.29
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE

HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE

The HD PENTAX-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE launched in February 2015 was a welcome addition to the 18-50/55 mm range of zoom lenses for the APS-C format with its built-in autofocus motor for silent autofocusing. Focusing manually with the focusing ring engages the AF motor, which takes care of the focusing. This implies that this lens cannot be used on DSLRs without lens power contacts (K100D and older).

As a first for Pentax this standard zoom lens is retractable for easy storage and portability. When retracted it measures but 41 mm in length. The lens is weather resistant making it useable in dusty environments or in light rain when paired with a weather-resistant Pentax DSLR.

The lens features the Pentax HD coating and super-low dispersion glass elements and aspherical elements for improved image quality.

The lens has an smc coated DA L counterpart, which is is included as a kit lens with a camera body and cannot be purchased separately.

HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
©, sharable with attribution
Image Format
Lens Mount
Pentax K
Aperture Ring
Automatic, 7 blades (rounded)
11 elements, 8 groups
Mount Variant
Check camera compatibility
Max. Aperture
Min. Aperture
AF (in-lens motor)
Min. Focus
30 cm
Max. Magnification
Filter Size
58 mm
Internal Focus
Field of View (Diag. / Horiz.)

APS-C: 76-31.5 ° / 67-27 °
Lens Cap
Weather Sealing
Yes (WR)
Other Features
Retractable,Focus by Wire
Diam x Length
71 x 41 mm (2.8 x 1.6 in.)
158 g (5.6 oz.)
Production Years
2015 to present (in production)
$281 USD current price
Engraved Name
HD PENTAX-DA 1:4-5.6 18-55mm DC WR RE
Product Code
User reviews
In-depth review
Low profile lens hood.
Not compatible with K100D and older.
Plastic mount.
One aspherical element, one ED element.

Supersonic AutofocusQuick ShiftWeather SealedAutomatic ApertureAPS-C Digital Only
Purchase: Buy the HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
In-Depth Review: Read our HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE in-depth review!

Add Review of HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE Buy the HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-7 of 7
Senior Member

Registered: September, 2008
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 104
Lens Review Date: July 19, 2018 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $120.00 | Rating: 9 

Pros: price/perfomance, small & light, fast, reasonably sharp, WR
Cons: bigger battery drain on older cameras
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 9    Autofocus: 9    Handling: 9    Value: 8    New or Used: New    Camera Used: K200D, K-01   

Bought this lens for 120 brand new with warranty. I compared it with SMC DA 18-55 II.
Construction is on par with regular kit lens. With HD coating photos are more contrasty and colours are cleaner than with SMC DA 18-55 II.
On K200D it's very fast and sharp, but not razorsharp like Sigma A 35
On K-01 with latest firmaware it's MEH, focusing speed is limited by old contrast detection algorithms and sharpness in on par with regular kit lens.
My best walkaround combo is now K200D + DA 18-50 RE, because of reasonable compactness and weather sealing.
For 120 money I recommend this lens, but for retail price of 250 this lens isn't so good purchase.
Veteran Member

Registered: July, 2013
Posts: 388

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: September 6, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 10 

Pros: very fast AUTOFOCUS drive!!!, sharp, compact, price-performance ratio, WR, dreamy bokeh
Cons: WR not as good as on other lenses
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 10    Autofocus: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10    New or Used: New    Camera Used: Pentax K-3, Pentax K-70   

Really sharp for a Kit-Lens. (use the lens hood!)
Autofocus is really fast with this lens.
And if i say fast, i say fast and not "a bit faster then DA*55 SDM",
I am talking about fast, (and autofocusing with that thing really makes fun because it does what it should do.)
no AF hunting,
I like the bokeh... it has an incy-wincy bit of that "dreamy" touch.
Couldnt make out any abberations.

You will be in need of getting used to manual focusing, if you are more the MF guy.
Nonetheless, the Quickshift is really nice.

Use the hood, then its all good.

(Even if you don't results aren't that bad. I shot the pic below without hood and harsh light from the left side.)
1/15s - 30mm (135 equiv = 45mm) - ISO 3200 - F:4.5
I would go so far and say that details are really good for a shot with 1/15s @ ISO 3200 ...

If you are a pixelpeeper, pls have a look at ISO 100 photos at the german Pentax Forum at ""

Veteran Member

Registered: July, 2007
Location: North West UK
Posts: 377
Lens Review Date: August 14, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $120.00 | Rating: 8 

Pros: Small, lightweight, silent focus, Good performance, sealing
Cons: silly MF ring, no hood, could be faster? Retraction button.
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Autofocus: 10    Handling: 8    Value: 9    New or Used: New    Camera Used: K-70, K-3II   

This seems to be a lens that polorizes opinions. By which I mean is it worthy as the "new" kit lens on APS-C.

In absolute terms of a lens performance, it is probably lacking, but there is more to that, when it comes to lenses.

First of all, it is a kit lens, and actually it is not bad at all. Sure, if you pixel peep, the sharpness wide open may lack the DA* lenses of this world, but remember it is a lens that came with the body, and for that it beats certain other brand kit lenses in performance, if not the old 18-55.

Firstly, it is nice and small, and if you have the K-01 (sadly I no longer have) I would consider it a perfect little zoom combo. But I don't so lets not dwell on that.

It is weather sealed
It is silent in its AF, and remarkably snappy too, something you cannot say with the old kit.
It is nice and small, and light too.
It is pretty good with sharpness, albeit micro-detail could be better
Colours and contrast are rather good.

So small, that my girlfriend could not get around the retraction button, and her thumb touching the rest of the lens meaning it would not extend. I don't find it an issue though, but many probably will.
No lens hood is included. Not tried the old hood on the lens yet, but you never know.
Manual Focus ring seems more like "focus by wire" rather than physical, very frustrating. but then again, I only use it in AF anyway.

Overall, I give it an 8. It is not perfect, but far from being a "dog". Actually I rather like it on my K-70 when I want to walk light.

Worth a consideration if you have any small body from the K100D Super onwards, or if you just want a compact zoom on your K-5/K-3
New Member

Registered: May, 2017
Posts: 5

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: May 9, 2017 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: $55.00 | Rating: 5 

Pros: In the review
Cons: In the review
Sharpness: 4    Aberrations: 5    Bokeh: 6    Autofocus: 6    Handling: 4    Value: 4    New or Used: New    Camera Used: K-S2   

This lens is not a good kit-lens. For sharp photos, aperture cannot be wider than f/8. This makes photos in darker environments impossible. The lens has noticeable chromatic aberration. The bokeh is good, considering that it is a kit-lens. The bokeh-balls are not round due to the aperture not being round. The aperture hole is deformed, and not placed in the center of the lens. But a good aperture is nothing I expect from a cheap kit-lens. The autofocus is ok, but the AF-motor is noisy. The build quality is bad, and it is hard to extend and retract the lens. The cheap plastic rings bend, making it hard to extend the lens from its compact position. The lens is too expensive, the performance is just too bad. For the same price you can buy old soviet lenses, which take much better pictures.
New Member

Registered: April, 2015
Posts: 7
Lens Review Date: August 1, 2016 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: N/A | Rating: 4 

Pros: Sharp, Light
Cons: Unstable, Flimsy
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 7    Autofocus: 10    Handling: 2    Value: 7    New or Used: New    Camera Used: Pentax K-S2   

Got this lens with the K-S2. On the surface it "looks" like a good idea, but in practice it is the most annoying lens I have ever used.

On the plus side it is very lightwieght, its lovely and sharp, and the auto-focus is quick and silent.

There doesn't seem to be much aberations, but there's little bokeh, cos it stops at just 50mm (reminds me of 28-70 lenses in the film era).

The BIG problem with this lens is the retract mechanism. It doesn't lock into place anywhere near as solidly as it should so its all too easy to retract while trying to compose a shot. When it extended there an uneasy wobble to the front of the lens, that you can see as a shift in the viewfinder. Not too much of a problem in stills, but it shows up as a wobble on vidoes.

I just don't see why they had to use the button on it to lock the lens. I've got the F 35-70 and thats a compact lens that "un-retracts" when using macro mode. Its got a good solid lock to it. You have to put extra force on the zoom ring to move to macro, and Ricoh could so easily have used that design for this lens.

I'm not convinved either that water drops on the outside of the barrel, won't get inside the lens once you retract it. This is after all supposed to be a WR lens. Ricoh can't say you should wipe the lens before you retract it (you don't have to on any other lenses they make), as thats not always practical to do in the field, plus the damn thing will retract by itself if you put any slight pressure on the front of it.

As supplied in the K-S2 kit, the lens is not HD coated. Thats only available if you buy it, and believe me I can buy much better lenses for that sort of money.

I've only had a few days use of the lens, the first few days I was getting used to the K-S2, but gradually this lens got me so annoyed that I gave up and used my other lenses. I thought I'd give it another try last week, and then I remembered why I'd put it away in the first place. Now its staying in the cupboard.
Site Supporter

Registered: August, 2014
Location: California
Posts: 126
Lens Review Date: October 19, 2015 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: N/A | Rating: 7 

Pros: Good price, compact
Cons: WWR did not work very well in my version

I think the lens took very nice images - clear, nice color. It was easy to use and to carry. I was disappointed that it is not that compact when ready for use - only as a stored lens.

More significantly, it allowed water into front element when it got wet during use for the first time. Granted, it was more than a light rain, but I expected it would do just fine and it did not. It showed up the next day as fog in the center of the element, and when I shook it a few days later water drops appeared all over the element. I have not decided if I will just return it (Costco within 90 days) or try to have it repaired. If it had better weather resistance (my primary purchase priority) it would be a no brainer to keep.
New Member

Registered: October, 2013
Location: Naples
Posts: 10

11 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: March 14, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $110.00 | Rating: 8 

Pros: compact and easy to expand, wr, efficient and silent af, optically good.
Cons: aperture 4.5 from 24 to 40mm and 5.6 to 50mm.
Sharpness: 7    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 7    Autofocus: 9    Handling: 8    Value: 9    New or Used: New    Camera Used: k5   

This is a great piece of low cost engineering.

In just 4 cm out of the camera you can have a standard zoom, dust and rain proof, with a very good autofocus and a good optical rendition. For a reasonable price.
Obiuovsly the real price to pay is the cheap plastic construction and the moderate maximum aperture, but I have to say that it's assembled well, and it's optically good even from maximum aperture, in the center but also in the edges of the frame it's still sharp more than most of zooms around here. It's not a preciuous piece of glass and metal, of course, not fast and not able in to giving a stellar IQ and a prestige handling, but for a satisfacing every day use, it gives you the usefull focal range of 18-50, a uniformly good and generally flawless IQ, a fast and silent AF like few ones in the Pentax system, a reliable rain ad dust safety, and all this in a light and small package.... that you can buy at a kit or kit splitted price of 120 dollars/euros... a big value! Otherwise, new it goes for less than 300/$, HD version.

It's quite sharp and resolving, with an impressive performance to be a such a compact zoom. Center is good like the 18-135 but edges are far better. It's between the 16-45 and the 17-70 IQ, but without cromatic aberration of both them. Do not expect tha closing it a stop or two it will rise up in IQ. Just a bit, one stop. No more.
There is a moderate fall of sharpness/contrast in the edges, more evident in the corners, of course, but it's very progressive and not in evidence like in 18-135. Contrast is good even with strong light sources in the frame. It has many leneses inside, but to be around 10 elements, it perfoms absolutelly well in term of rlare and contrast resistance. Mine in an smc, so I guess the HD could do even a bit better. It's not a modern prime, anyway. Contrast and vibrance aren't the best out there. There are virtually no color aberrations. There is no purple fringing or neither other colours fringing or any dominance, even on high contrast areas in the image, not even in the edges of the frame. Wide side, as tele side, are both capable into give a good and uniform IQ.
I have to say, it is not a miracle of rendition, can't offer a wooow effect like the best star zoom or lilimited primes. But it is quite sharp all over the frame and it has a good overall contrast and a hight resolving power, from maximum aperture, that make of it a "new generation" standard kit lens. It has not the vibrance and tone to tone color transition of a limited lens. Neither their extreeme sharpness in the "sweet spot". When closed, this zoom gain something, but it could never reach the sharpness pick of the best star zoom or primes. But the MTF scores should be very good for a relativelly cheap and such a compact zoom. It's supposed to be used on 20mpxs and more sensors on the small last generation dslr. And it can do the job well, for a right price.
The bokeh is ok, not so creamy (in well corrected slow zoom like this it's never the best) and not so progressive (it's only f4-5.6 afetr all!) but even so, it is not crispy or nervous, thanks to the rounded 7 blades. It's far better than the bokeh of 18-55, 16-45, and so on. 7 rounded blades is like to have 8 balde or more, like in the best star zoom. It's not a fast lens, anyway.
I liked very much the ability to deliver immages without the typical flaws of zooms or compact lens. Uniformity and good average IQ without issues, in 4cm.
Center and border, wide and tele, from maximum aperture. The real pro in this lens IQ is the missing of cons. in such a compact and usefull standard zoom.
Such a correct and uniform rendition in a small collapsable zoom is a new trend of tecnology that finally makes sense of small and hig density pixelled dslr.

Mecchanically it's ok. Not a joy to use, but very funciotnal. Far away to feel like a tank but solid enought to be trusted and to last years in an everyday use as a compact companion of our dsrl in the everyday life, in the bag or the backpack, as a piece of our usual equipment. Its main feature is the compact and collapsed barrel! A fast and quite solid mechanism expands and collaps the barrel in a rapid, simply and intuitive move, pressing a button on the zoom ring and rotating it a bit (60 degrees). Construction is light but quite solid. Gives a feeling of budget materials but resistant and well assembled. In pair with the 18 55 wr II or a bit better. The zoom ring is ok and the manual focus too. Good, but a bit too light. Not smooth but at least very uniform. Better than many pentax da. The feeling of plastic is a bit better than the DA L 35 or 50mm. The barrel design is similar to them. When mounted, collapsed, it is just 4cm out of the camera body, and has only a 58mm diameter. It's like to have a prime. Weight is very low too! Even the hood is compact, as a filter, the same of the 21 limited. Maybe less efficient than a standard hood, I gues, but on f 4-5.6 its not a real limit on the wide side. Some people complain about the plastic bayonet. It's not a problem on such a light lens. When expanded, it occupies the same lenght and volume of the 18-55. But is still lighter. And the hood of the 18-50 is like a filter, not a flower one.

Af is great pro of this zoom. It's fast, silent and accurate. In Pentax this is so uncommon, even in the most expensive lens. It catch the focus fast and well even if the maximum aperture is so moderate, at any focal. At least on my k5, even in dark situation it works quite fast and well. So I guess it performs better on k5II and k3 or on ks2 and futures bodyes. The DC motor is such an improvement, sdm is lazy and weak, screwdrive is slow and so loud. This DC AF doesn't seem to suffer from artificial light, no back/front focus or huntig delay in night condition, outdoor or indoor. On this lens the DC motor works well like on the da 18 135, not bad like on the 20 40 limited. Mine copy had an accurate focus, I hadn't to make a fine tuning. A fast and silent AF is for sure one of the best thing to have in a everyday life lens like fhis. Fast to catch the moment when you suddenly take the camera out of the bag, where you can keep such a compact body+lens pair. Silent AF is in pair with the compact design, to be as less noticeable as possible.

Manual focus is not a joy on a plastic barrel with a weak resistance ring, but it's uniform in rotation. Quick shift focus is a usefull addition. From 25mm, f4.5, and more from 40mm f5.6, the viewfinder becomes dark, so I can't reccomend this lens for a manual focus use. It's a fast point 'n shot zoom, and DC af works great!

A supercompact and standatd focals zoom, optically good and uniform from max. aperture and without abberations, sharp and resolving enougth to be ready for new generation sensors, with a uncommon AF performance in Pentax, and even WR. Plastic but efficient construction. A bit slow but good from max aperture.

What esle?

Splitted from a kit it's a great value. Onestly I will nerver pay 300 bucks for a new stand alone one... I'd use my money for a 16-85, bigger but more versatile zoom.

Much better than the 18 55, better than 18-135 (edges and aberations), the smaller zoom, optically ok for 20mpxs apsc, finally a great AF motor. For a similar price.
Add Review of HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE Buy the HD Pentax-DA 18-50mm F4-5.6 DC WR RE

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]