Author: | | Site Supporter Registered: November, 2023 Posts: 53 | Review Date: January 28, 2024 | Not Recommended | Price: $349.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Lot of situation | Cons: | The focal is too hight( 5.6-6.4) | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K70
| | I tested this lens because I've had it for almost 2 months.
It's a good telephoto lens which unfortunately requires light to get good images.
So it's really made for nature in broad daylight in the morning or late afternoon.
I took a lot of photos with this one.
And I am of the opinion that if you come across a good number. It's a treat.
It has a bokeh that I love, good sharpness, it's very quiet. I don't understand the people who put a bokeh at 6, it's certainly not the same.
I highly recommend this lens,
It seems that the Sigma 100-300 F4 is above it but all the good Pentaxians keep it... too bad.
Maybe one day I will make a difference. | | | | | | Review Date: February 24, 2020 | Not Recommended | Price: $250.00
| Rating: 4 |
Pros: | Zoom range | Cons: | Zooming not smooth but very stiff | Sharpness: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 3
Value: 4
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-3II
| | If I take a picture with it, it's very good. But composition is very hard to do, because zooming is difficult especially in small steps. I noticed that a lot reviewers complain at the stiffness of the zoom. I expected it to be as smooth as Pentax's 18-135, and it is not. I wonder why Pentax is not able to have the same smoothness of zooming in all its lenses. Only in specific cases I turn to this lens. I returned this lens to have it serviced, but Ricoh service let me know that zooming is within parameters for this lens, the seller warned me for this reaction of Ricoh. Unfortunately I cannot recommend this lens. | | | | New Member Registered: September, 2010 Posts: 22 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: February 7, 2019 | Not Recommended
| Rating: 6 |
Pros: | sharpness | Cons: | Durability | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 8
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K3
| | I had this lens for only a short time and truly enjoyed it, sadly I would not buy again though because as I was getting out of my truck after coming home from a winter hike on the beach the lens barely tapped my steering wheel. I looked in amazement because it had snapped in half along the barrel. When I looked closer at it I could see it was the thinnest of plastic. I do most of my shooting outside and I know I can be hard on my gear but as a 30 year user (and bragger) of Pentax equipment I was quite disappointed to say the least. I also own a 16-85 that has been at the shop more than in my bag. I use primes 90% of the time but still expect better from Pentax zooms.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: July, 2008 Location: Arizona Posts: 230 | Review Date: September 6, 2018 | Not Recommended | Price: $375.00
| Rating: 4 |
Pros: | Smaller than the DA 55-300 | Cons: | Terrible sharpness-auto focus OK | Sharpness: 3
Aberrations: 5
Bokeh: 5
Autofocus: 4
Handling: 5
Value: 5
New or Used: New
Camera Used: Pentax k3II
| | Bought this with a new K3ii hoping for a combo for sports. Big disappointment. Bought them online from a NYC vendor. Normally they accept returns within 30 days-after two weeks tried to return both-they would take the camera back but not the lens-that tells you something. Terrible low light combination-my K5iis blows it out of the water. Can't try it on another camera because of the new mount-don't even think about sending to the repair center for evaluation. If you buy this lens make sure you ask if you can return it-caveat emptor
| | | | | New Member Registered: October, 2010 Location: Liverpool, UK Posts: 14 | Review Date: March 8, 2017 | Not Recommended | Price: $400.00
| Rating: 6 |
Pros: | Light, sharp, quick, compact. | Cons: | Fragile | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 7
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-3 II
| | Good: Great focal length
Very sharp
Lens focusing is very quick
Light and small for its focal length Bad: Irritating having to remember to extend the lens - a downsize to its compactness
Aperture range
The lens may be quicker at focusing, but the camera is still glacial Ugly: My daughter knocked my camera and lens onto the floor - a drop of 30cm, and the lens acquired a small bend. Worked perfectly, even so. Took it to the Pentax service centre in the UK, where he took the mount off, and showed me the plastic component that had broken - typically £20-60 to repair, he said, for comparable lenses. The next thing I heard, it had to be sent to Japan for assessment, and then they said that repairs would be £330 - for a lens I paid £250 for in the sales. I've gone through the house insurance and got a replacement in the end, but it means that I don't feel I can recommend the lens - hopefully, others won't have similar problems, and I've just been extremely unlucky.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: February, 2011 Location: Brno Posts: 295 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: November 4, 2023 | Recommended | Price: $350.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Size, weight, AF | Cons: | Aperture, cost of new unit, not fully compatible with K5 and older cameras | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 8
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K3 (K5, K20D, M4/3 adapted)
| | Lens is a solid little telephoto. I also have older SMC DA55-300/4-5.8 which I bought back in 2008 and I was quite happy with it. I also have large things like Sigma 100-300/4, Sigma 50-500/4-6.3 and few 70-200/2.8 lenses.
Concerning image quality this HD DA55-300PLM WR fits somewhere between the old SMC DA55-300 and Sigma 100-300/4. Obviously it does not reach aperture or resolution levels of that large fast zoom, but it optically is a bit better than the older brother. It shows best output closed to F8-F10 at long end like the older 55-300. Resolution is not bad for such small telephoto. F6.3 aperture is nothing to boast about, but on daylight it is ok.
Autofocus is quiet and much faster than the old body driven SMC DA55-300. About comparable to Sigma 70-200/2.8 HSM and surprisingly even the body driven Sigma 100-300/4 can refocus almost as fast. AF accuracy is OK.
When you change zoom of the lens, camera is always refocusing the lens even without any user interaction.
Lens size is perfect thanks to collapsible design. It is shorter than my M4/3 Olympus 75-300/4.8-6.7 and just a tiny bit more fat. Squeezing such zoom range into such small body is something. It is also weather sealed to some extent (I would not recommend to zoom during rain), which is nice. Collapsible design requires the button to be pushed and lens to be extended to allow camera to work with it. When collapsed, it does nothing.
There are two sad things about this lens. It does not have any focusing scale, so you have to rely on viewfinder of live-view when focusing manually. So forget about some night shots with MF unless you see something on display. The other sad thing is the aperture control mechanism that needs K3 or newer body to work properly. But on K3 it is perfectly OK.
Lets say you already have older SMC DA55-300/4-5.8 or HD DA55-300/4-5.8WR. Is this lens an upgrade? Optically there is barely any noticeable difference. Those older lenses were quite good for their range already. AF is significantly faster. But the question is price. I bought this lens because the 2nd hand price was too tempting to let it be. But price of new PLM one is not worth the difference if you already have one of those older lenses. And if you are frequently using older cameras like K5 or you have such camera as a backup, then this new PLM wont fully support it. It works, it focuses, but you are shooting wide open all the time.
In general it is good little modern telephoto lens and you'll be happy with it if your intended use is mainly for tourism, outdoor trips, daylight shooting, shooting with F8, birds and other animals, distant cityscape etc.
If you want lens for indoor photography, portraiture, low light or you need hi-res telephoto, look elsewhere. | | | | Site Supporter Registered: September, 2010 Location: Venlo Posts: 163 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: April 17, 2023 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | weight, size,price,price/performance ratio | Cons: | none for this price | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 6
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K3 Mk.III
| | I bought this lens new, and traded the first (non-WR) version of this lens, so it is difficult to mention a price.
When I first tried to make the AF micro-adjustment, the necessary lens correction was out of limit. I sent camera and lens for calibration (warranty) and the lens returned perfect. Zero adjustment (although I had to re-adjust my other lenses, because the camera was calibrated as well).
This is a great walk around lens. I love to take it when hiking. Very versatile, good range, lightweight. No, this is not a fast lens, but that was clear before the purchase.
Autofocus is not only very fast, but also very reliable. Also for birds in flight.
For the rest, I speak about the 300mm setting only.
Other reviewers mention soft corners. I agree. The corners don't increase much at f/11. But in my experience it is mainly bad at short focus distance. Landscapes aren't sharp from center to edge, but acceptably sharp at f/11. Praise the newer camera bodies with excellent high-ISO performance
I edit my RAW images in DxO Photolab and PL handles the aberrations well, no problems here.
That said, the lens is no match for my Sigma 4/100-300mm EX DG. A completely different league. And a different size, weight and price. The resolution, translated into details, the IQ in the corners, everything is way better with the Sigma. On the other hand, if your subject is an animal at a distance of 100ft, the differences between lenses disappear completely if the AF is half an inch off. And the Sigma is not only much slower than the 55-300, but also less reliable. If I use a TC with the Sigma, the largest aperture becomes comparable and the difference in AF speed is huge.
My main negative point is the rendering of OOF areas. Not especially bokeh, not about the shape of OOF highlights, but the OOF areas are more distracting than I expected. Even from a slow lens.
All images below are 100% crops.
Sigma 4/100-300 f/6.3 corner, focus distance approx. 250-300 feet [IMG]https://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/images/30515/large/1_Pentax-IMGP5806_corner_f6.3.jpg[/IMG]
Pentax 55-300 f/6.3 corner, focus distance approx. 250-300 feet. Somehow, this image doesn't show here, but it can be viewed in the gallery, via the link. Strange.
Sigma 4/100-300mm f/6.3 center, focus distance approx. 250-300 feet
Pentax 55-300mm f/6.3 center, focus distance approx. 250-300 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/11 corner, focus distance approx. 30 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/6.3 corner, focus distance approx. 30 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/11 corner, focus distance approx. 10 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/11 center, focus distance approx. 10 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/6.3 corner, focus distance approx. 10 feet
Pentax 55-300mm, f/6.3 center, focus distance approx. 10 feet
| | | | New Member Registered: January, 2023 Posts: 1 7 users found this helpful | Review Date: January 28, 2023 | Recommended
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | good price, sharpnes, very fast autofocus | Cons: | more plastic | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 10
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 7
Value: 8
New or Used: New
Camera Used: KP K10D
| | For this price is the best small tele lens! If you thinking about buy this lens buy it. Now i need more lights and buy 150-450 but if not have money for 150-450 buy 55-300 plm! Look at my photos! 17 by Łukasz Karzełek, on Flickr 12 by Łukasz Karzełek, on Flickr 10 by Łukasz Karzełek, on Flickr
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: July, 2011 Posts: 2,378 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: December 24, 2022 | Recommended
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Nice package wrt features, performance & price | Cons: | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K3iii
| | This lens offers all great Pentax features like compact/folding design, very good optical performance and even silent AF and weather sealing. The price is very competitive.
Aperture wise it is a slow lens with f/6.3 at the long end. SR helps to create sharp images, but the lightweight lens is shaky in the viewfinder. Chromatic abberation is visible - still well controlled. Nice and light APSC package. K1 with 150-450 plays in a different league wrt size, weight, price and quality.
Minimum focus distance is also great.Folded it is as long as the 100M, very nice for travel.
For the price, this lens is a must have, unless you go big (150-450) or fixed (DA300). Family can now mix and match K1ii/K3iii and 150-450/55-300.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: October, 2022 Location: Glyfada, a southern suburb of Athens Posts: 205 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: December 4, 2022 | Recommended | Price: $315.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | sharp & fast, bokeh (!!!), best "value for money" zoom you can buy | Cons: | it comes without a pouch and that's cheap from Pentax | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 10
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: KP
| | Purchased at any amazing deal, brand new, from a german retailer at 315 $/€ before shipment. I think there was a glitch in their system and gave me, kind of, twice, a 40 euro Pentax coupon since the today price is 395 $/€ [ I was discounted for only one coupon since their system had already subtracted one more coupon]
Already had 55-300 in "DAL" and the "HD red" version which I am now getting rid off even if the "red" is a faster and a superb lens.
Received the glass on a Friday and on Saturday I went to shoot my 2 1/2 years old son's X-mas show together with a Limited HD 15mm/F4.0 at my bag. A great combo for such events. Trust me.
As per photo, I was shooting from the last raw of a 40 meter / 120ft long theatre in pitch dark. Only lights available during the show were just the ones on stage.
I had set the ISO at max 20.000 to avoid noise and I was shooting on P mode with my KP and clicking always the "green" meter button before every sessions in "full" metering. I had also set the P mode on subject focus ( background secondary/blurred). That was a very wise decision together with the "Spot" AF.
Below you can see two photos. The first photo is shot with the 15/4 in order you realise the distance.
The second is an example not just of the lens' abilities at the extreme (300mm, ISO 800, f/6.3, 1/400s !!!) but mostly of it's "bokeh" wonders that have nothing to fear from prime premium gear. I could not believe it.
What you see is also "Photoshopped" in terms of "lens profile" and a few minor adjustments; mostly in White Balance as it was way off due to the various strobe-colored lights of the event.
WHAT A LENS!!!' quality-quality-quality everywhere
And yes, I find offending that Pentax does not include a case/pouch inside the box. Shame on them. | | | | Pentaxian Registered: December, 2007 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 325 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 22, 2022 | Recommended | Price: $360.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | A sharp lens with great bokeh and excellent autofocus, all in a compact and lightweight design. | Cons: | I wouldn't change a thing! | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: Pentax K-70
| | This is a sharp lens with superb bokeh, especially when shooting in nature with difficult, busy backgrounds (such as thin branches or grasses). That combination of sharp in-focus areas with lovely background blur provides superb overall rendering. It also has excellent flare resistance.
The autofocus is accurate, fast, and silent (thanks to the PLM motor). The lens is exceptionally compact when stored. It is also very light and well balanced. The handling is superb.
Overall, the rendering and handling characteristics make for a very special package, far better than most similar zooms from other manufacturers.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: June, 2013 Posts: 321 | Review Date: July 4, 2022 | Recommended | Price: $395.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Very sharp between f8 and f11 | Cons: | Not sharp very sharp at F6.3 - f6.8 | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 9
New or Used: New
Camera Used: KP
| | I also have the DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED WR Lens. Started shooting some zoo animals and backyard wildlife (I live on the border of a state park) and decided it was time to upgrade my autofocus capabilities with this lens on a KP, since the combo of the old lens with a K5IIs was not cutting it with even mild animal movement during shoot. While the autofocus is a big step up, this lens does not meet my requirements for being sharp wide open or even closed down a little at the longer end of the zoom. That said, at f8-f11 it is very good at every focual length, but not noticeably better than the old zoom in a landscape shooting situation where autofocus speed and silence is not required. Sharpness is a nine at those apertures, but only a seven at f6.3 to 6.8, where I need it the most. As a general telephoto zoom, size, speed, and sharpness are very fine, but maybe not good enough for sports, action, bokeh-blur, and wildlife, espically in low light. I might just try a second example of this lens for wide-open performance...
| | | | Forum Member Registered: March, 2011 Location: Niagara, Ontario Posts: 57 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: November 2, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $280.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Focus speed, light weight, image quality, build. | Cons: | AF needs good light. a little soft at long end | | An excellent wide range light weight zoom lens for general photography with very fast AF in good light. Ideal as a walk-around lens. Image quality is very good up to 280 mm and drops off slightly up to 300mm, but not enough to bother me. Build quality and waterproofing is good and the zoom movement is relatively smooth on my copy. The lens lock button is easy to unlock by just pressing the button and rotating the lens barrel with the same hand. As a bird watcher the rapid AF speed captures the song birds flitting from branch to branch at medium range providing light is good. There is a learning curve to master capturing birds-in-flight, but I have longer lenses for this application. Purchased fro a Pentax dealer in Niagara Ontario for C$ 356.00. My US price is estimated. A very preliminary review as I recently purchased this lens. | | | | Loyal Site Supporter Registered: April, 2021 Location: Stratford Ontario Posts: 256 | Review Date: August 20, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $400.00
| Rating: N/A |
Pros: | Great IQ, Fast Focus | Cons: | none | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: Pentax KP
| | This lens is just this side of magic. Focus is fast and **silent**. Sharpness is excellent, even when shooting at focal length extremes. This might be my new "stuck on the camera" lens
First test photo using this lens is attached, I think it's a keeper (it was on my way home from Camera Canada - thanks again to Bruce there for your help today!) | | | | Site Supporter Registered: June, 2017 Location: 3City agglomeration Posts: 2,000 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: July 25, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $515.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | fast AF, silent, light, cheap | Cons: | a bit soft above 210mm, very soft above 250mm | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: New
Camera Used: Pentax K-3 Mk III
| | I bought this lens to replace Tamron 70-300 Macro for airplane and train shooting and while it was a good decision, this lens is not without drawbacks.
Pros are mainly superb autofocus, handling and build . Even on K-50 this lens was great, but on K-3 Mk III it shines, sings and dances when it comes to autofocus. It is extremely fast, accurate and silent. Lens itself is also very light, easy to use handheld. It is very well build for cheaper DA lens, despite being plastic feels sturdy and solid. After two years of use it is still as new. And, well, that is it.
Cons are what should be above, so optics. Frankly this lens is soft from 210 but to 250 it is usable. Above 250 it is horrible. As I was using it handheld mostly I thought it was due to my hands shaking, but no. With tripod, SR off and timer release images from 250 to 300 are as soft. It simply looks as if some sort of smudge was applied. No matter if you shoot at f6.3 or f11 you get soft, unsharp images. This is real drawback if you need longer but sharp lens (for plane spotting for example).
Is it worthless? No, but you need to remember that this is DA, not DA* lens. With all pros and cons. If you do not need super sharp 200+ range then this will be great lens, worth it even for size and AF speed and accuracy. If you need longer reach and sharpness, check DA* - both zoom and primes.
Images below are SOOC jpges, shot as "reversible film", without image filter.
300mm, f8, 1/640
210mm, f8, 1/640
170mm, f8, 1/640
77mm, f7.1, 1/2500 | | |