Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing all 3 reviews by troenaas

Review of: HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm F3.5-4.5 Fish-Eye ED by troenaas on Tue October 22, 2019 | Rating: 8 View more reviews 
HD_Pentax-DA_10-17mm_F3_5-4_5_ED_Fish-eye_PFa_w_hood.jpg

Views: 20673
Reviews: 5
I received the lens today and this is a quick comparison review. I also have the SMC Pentax 17mm F4 Fish-Eye and compared that to the this new HD DA 10-17mm. Image 1 = is 10mm with shade on: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126510.html Image 2 = is 10mm with shade off: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126509.html Image 3 = SMC at 17mm: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126507.html Image 4 = HD DA at 17mm: https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126508.html Image 5 = Croma (HD DA vs SMC) Croma on new HD DA worse than SMC - very surprising.. https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126517.html Image 6 = Sharpness (HD DA vs SMC) A slight win for the new HD DA https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126518.html Image 7 = Distortion, vignetting and color (HD DA vs SMC) Distortion and colors are better on HD DA but vignetting is worse. https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/16474-troenaas/albums/13330-fish-eye/picture126519.html I did expect more from a modern lens with a new coating at 17mm, compared to the SMC and have to admit that I'm a bit disappointed. That is why I can't rate it higher than 8. Could it be a bad lens copy? If you don't own a fish-eye lens I would recommend it. :)

Review of: HD Pentax-D FA 28-105mm F3.5-5.6 ED DC WR by troenaas on Thu November 30, 2017 | Rating: 10 View more reviews 
pentax_dfa_28-105mm_with_hood.jpg

Views: 167121
Reviews: 41
When I purchased the K1, I had to choose between the D-FA 24-70mm and the D-FA 28-105mm standard zoom lenses. I chose the latter. I had three reasons for choosing the D-FA 28-105mm; size, reach and price. I have never regretted my decision. And after reading reviews of both the D-FA 24-70mm and the D-FA 28-105mm I really feel I made the right choice. It is a terrific walkabout and travel lens. The image was captured with the following settings: Handheld pointing straight up (which makes it even harder because of an uncomfortable posture) 105mm ISO800 f5.6 1/13s Inside the St. Peters Basilica in Rome. The small dome In front of the Michelangelo sculpture. https://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/images/16474/large/1_IMGP7793.jpg

Review of: SMC Pentax 17mm F4 Fish-Eye by troenaas on Wed November 29, 2017 | Rating: 10 View more reviews 
121776836-O.jpg

Views: 99802
Reviews: 21
I bought this lens at a good price from a Canon user (who had removed the aperture lever). Nonetheless it functions properly on the K1. My copy is version 2. Every time I use this lens on the K1, I'm impressed by the results. In my opinion, it is a great companion to the K1 and highly recommended. https://www.pentaxforums.com/gallery/images/16474/large/1_IMGP7979a.jpg



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top