Author: | | Forum Member Registered: September, 2021 Posts: 62 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: February 10, 2024 | Recommended | Price: $120.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Size, built quality, lens hood, focal length | Cons: | Sharpness outside of the center, sharpness in general | | Like many users said before, the size is just awesome and the lens hood is something I like a lot.
The focal length is perfect for a lot of purposes.
But one thing to notice is, that this lens does produce horrible images if it has not been stopped down to at least F8 !!
Purple areas are simply dramatic of not stopped down, as well as a significant lack of sharpness in the corners.
If there is enough light, or you are using a tripod so that stopping down is possible, it produces really nice pictures.
Just don't buy this lens if shooting wide open is something you need :-)
| | | | | New Member Registered: April, 2019 Posts: 5 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: May 28, 2023 | Recommended | Price: $260.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Colour & contrast | Cons: | Bit soft at the edges.. but not by much | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K3
| | This is my most used lens for walking about. Love the images it produces, great colour and contrast. Lightweight and compact. Sharp and focus is good.
Anyway not much of a lens reviewer... here's some images taken on a recent walkabout.
You can make your own mind up - all SOOC jpegs. | | | | New Member Registered: November, 2019 Posts: 1 | Review Date: March 19, 2023 | Recommended | Price: $280.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Sharp | Cons: | None | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 8
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K-3
| | My 'walkabout' lens for my K-3, on which it represents the full-frame equivalent of approx. 31.5mm.
Very sharp with nice colour rendition.
Personally I'm uncertain of the merits of its unique lens hood - mine has been replaced with a NOS Pentax 49mm standard 50mm 1.4/1.7/2.0 round plastic hood that gets covered with an Optech/USA mini Hood Hat in lieu of a lens cap.
Occasionally pressed into action on my K-1, it works rather well at it's 21mm focal length with my preferred 1x1 crop option.
| | | | New Member Registered: September, 2016 Posts: 8 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: February 2, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $470.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | my standard–go to lens since 2007 | Cons: | none | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 10
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-10 through K-1
| | I bought this lens for my first digital K-10 Pentax in 2007 and it has been my primary go-to lens through a succession of Pentax bodies, through the K-20d, K-5, K-3, K-1, and K-70 and, although I have added other limited primes since then, it is still my favorite.
FWIW, I almost always default to an f/8 aperture priority. Had to have it repaired locally for loose screws, but been great since. Given the opportunity, I might someday update to the newer version (red band, versus the green band). And waiting to see what the 21mm full-frame will be (and cost).
For many examples, see: https://originalrefrigeratorart.blogspot.com and https://ora2.blogspot.com | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: December, 2011 Location: Melbourne + Malvern East Victoria Australia Posts: 377 | Review Date: January 3, 2021 | Recommended
| Rating: 10 |
| great lens
| | | | Site Supporter Registered: October, 2009 Location: Dublin, Ireland Posts: 385 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: October 30, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $250.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | perfect starbursts, small size, clever lens hood | Cons: | slightly soft corners | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-S2, K200D
| | So much more than the sum of its parts!
The standout features of this lens don't fit neatly into the provided boxes. The colors are rich yet balanced. The lens is tiny and sturdy. And the starbursts (or sunstars) are astonishing.
I bought this lens second-hand because I wanted a green SMC Pentax-DA 15mm Limited for landscapes, but I couldn't find an affordable copy. So I got this, hearing that the starbursts were comparable. Well, they are not "comparable," they are "every bit as good." It has become my favorite lens, with the possible exception of my DA Fish-Eye.
It's hard to explain why this lens is so good. It's sharp, but not perfect. ƒ/3.2 isn't all that fast. 21mm on APS-C isn't particularly wide. This should be a ho-hum lens.
And yet. And yet. This lens delivers. It is so tiny, the colors are so good, and the starbursts are so sharp. I now own four Limiteds: the 15mm, 40mm, 70mm, and this one. This is the pick of the litter.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: May, 2015 Posts: 3,304 | Review Date: June 2, 2020 | Recommended
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | size, focal length, contrast | Cons: | barrel distortion, speed | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 7
New or Used: New
Camera Used: K-5, K-3II
| | Nice compact lens with very flexible focal length. I had this lens practically glued to my camera for long periods of time. The focal length can do everything and gives a wide but somehow normal looking perspective.
The colours, contrast and rendering are all very good.
My copy developed a distinct wobble of the barrel despite the short length but no visible impact on optical performance.
The barrel distortion isn't huge but for someone shooting architecture it made me miss the perfectly vertical framing far more often than I'd liked.
| | | | Pentaxian Registered: November, 2014 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 1,748 | Review Date: January 9, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $270.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Size; Image Quality; Fast Aperture; | Cons: | A little wobbly construction? | New or Used: New
| | My first limited! I got this for a trip abroad where I was attracted to the relative speed (3.2 is basically 2.8) for the small profile, with a wide-normal field of view for general scenes including landscapes and people. At first I thought, I might buy it and then sell it after the trip, but it fit its purpose so well that I kept it and got more limiteds! Shoot.
I've noticed CA but nothing major, it's a good sharp lens. I like placing my subjects on the edges of the frame, and sometimes if they're farther away and i'm shooting wide open the softness is not great and it looks like they're out of focus. So not great for that particular purpose. But for landscapes, general travel photography, grabbing shots with great color and sharpness, it's a killer lens! Unfortunately, it did not really help too much with avoiding attention. It's better than a big 24-70 lens of course, but attached to a K-3 and up to my face it's still obvious what's up. (I've found it's easier to not be noticed with a smaller point and shoot like the GR) A more concrete benefit to the slim profile is the ease of taking it anywhere and packing it. Other notes: I got a 43mm filter and screwed it into the flat lens hood, also the focus ring wobbles a bit, which isn't too worrying but a little unfortunate.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: June, 2018 Posts: 131 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: January 5, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $220.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Small, lovely colours | Cons: | Could be faster, but I wouldn't want it any heavier | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K50, K3ii
| | As others have said, an excellent walk-around focal length. Colours (especially blues) are beautiful. Centre sharpness is very good from f4. Floaty light, lovely to use. Out of focus areas look very natural. Would replace immediately if I lost it. | | | | Pentaxian Registered: September, 2018 Location: Poland Posts: 1,765 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: December 23, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | build quality, IQ | Cons: | nothing | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-50
| | This little lens has a lovely color rendition. Its focal length makes it a perfect walk-around prime for APS-C sensor. Very good build quality and a clever lens hood. Sharpness is ok when wide open and gets very good stopped down.
F/3.2:
F/4
F/5.6 | | | | Forum Member Registered: December, 2011 Location: Somewhere in Northern NJ, USA Posts: 74 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: September 2, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | great viewing angle, fast focus in low light esp. with K-70, compact design | Cons: | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-70
| | I primarily bought this as a lens to take with me for low light street shooting. Will try it soon with a bounce flash, and daylight stuff.
I'm pleased with the results thus far. Definitely worth the money to add to one's Pentax lens collection. | | | | Site Supporter Registered: May, 2013 Posts: 341 3 users found this helpful | Review Date: April 2, 2018 | Not Recommended | Price: $590.00
| Rating: 7 |
Pros: | good autofocus, light and very portable | Cons: | poor edge to edge sharpness | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 9
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 7
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: Pentax K-5iis
| | I love the portability of the lens and the hood design which does not project out from the lens body and is easy to put on and remove. Unfortunately, for a prime lens, its not as sharp as it should be as edge to edge sharpness falls off even at higher aperture values, f8 and up. Flaring is also an issue.
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: June, 2012 Location: Tokyo Posts: 1,041 6 users found this helpful | Review Date: March 23, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $300.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Starburst Effects, Build quality, Price | Cons: | n/a | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Autofocus: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-3
| | It used to have a FA20 and now DA21. This review will be more of “what I feel” between using 21 and 20.
Sharpness: I equally satisfy with 21 as I did with the 20. Both are sharp. I mostly use both lenses for night cityscapes / long exposure type of shooting. There are a few trick to get the most out of wide angle lens when focus at infinity for landscape photography which I am not going to mention here, but you can read a more extensive explanation from this page. The author did quite a good job explaining using real world example + offering tips.
Build / Handling: I am not a fan of pancake lens. In fact I like the size of FA20 a lot more but when talk about build quality; you cannot go wrong with the limited. I prefer the build quality of 21. Focus ring on 21 is small but don’t let the size fool you. You will get a sense of preciseness when rotate the focus ring, solid in hand and easier to handle when manual focus compare to that on FA20.
Price: FA20 used is about the same as a brand new 21. However I went with 20 at first because back then, I planned to move up to FF. 20 didn’t disappoint me in term of image quality but now I put my FF upgrade on hold. Since I will stick with APS-C for a while I think it is a no-brainer for APS-C shooter to get a 21 rather than pay extra for the 20. One more point I want to make here is; my 20 later on has an internal problem with its focus mechanism. Something seems to be broken inside out of the blue. I can hear strange sound when shake the lens, and Pentax Square in Tokyo cannot open it up for a possible fix. Keep in mind that 20 is an old lens, it is a bit of gamble buying one. At the same price tag, you get 2 shots with used 21 but only one with 20.
Starburst: 21 (green) offers nicer, sharper looking Starburst Effects than that on FA20. If you like Starburst Effects on DA15 (green), you will like the 21 (green) too.
| | | | New Member Registered: March, 2017 Posts: 2 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: March 17, 2017 | Not Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 5 |
Pros: | Size, quick-shift manual focus | Cons: | soft | Sharpness: 5
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 6
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K7
| | I've owned a Pentax-M 20mm f4 for over 30 years. I didn't use it very much in the film era. I wasn't fond of the distortion towards the edges, I thought it was soft and the colour was subdued unlike other Pentax glass I owned. When the digital era arrived with cropped sensors I gave it another try. Distortion was no longer an issue but it was too soft and continued to sit on the shelf and collect dust.
However, I found that I was using the 20mm focal range on a 17-50 Tamron quite frequently so when a 21mm Limited appeared on CL for a good price, I bought it.
When I was testing it the day of purchase there were a number of concerns, focus seemed soft and it had problems locking infinity focus at times. I thought the problems could be fixed with a fine focus adjustment so I completed the purchase.
I've now been testing the Limited for a number of days. I was surprised to find the IQ virtually identical to the Pentax-M 20mm. Actually I was more shocked than surprised, although colour and contrast tended to be better on the Limited if it was a shot taken in good light it was hard to tell them apart.
I thought that there must be something wrong with the Limited. I stripped it down and inspected everything but couldn't find a problem. The last step on reassembly was to set infinity focus and when that was done it was in the exact same position the factory had set.
Even though I found no mechanical issues with the lens I think there's a problem with the lens pack. Either the assembly wasn't adjusted correctly at the factory or some of the glass is sub-standard. I shoot a K7 and to correct focus I had to adjust the firmware to +40 UM and the lens +10. That's the equivalent of +14 when thinking of it in a menu equivalent adjustment, not something I consider normal.
What I do find surprising is that someone lived with this lens through the warranty period (in Canada I believe 2 years). When other reviewers extol the sharpness of their lenses I must believe that their copies really are that sharp. For what is marketed as a premium lens I would consider mine unacceptable. Pentax needs to improve quality control if they haven't already done so, in my opinion this lens shouldn't have been sold.
I consider it to be OK for street photography (what I bought it for) but unacceptable for landscape photography. Focus is soft and doesn't improve with smaller apertures although edge sharpness and contrast do.
| | | | amateur dirt farmer Registered: December, 2014 Location: probably out in a field somewhere... Posts: 41,131 4 users found this helpful | Review Date: December 4, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $239.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | build/feel, quick AF, color rendition | Cons: | MFD, could be quicker | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 7
Autofocus: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 9
New or Used: Used
Camera Used: K-3, K-50
| | my review for the SMC DA21mm f3.2 AL Limited (Ambrosia)...
I attempted to Single with the DA21 a couple of months ago, but discovered that it was no longer focusing at infinity, so off to Advance Camera for what was essentially a CLA job...
all the things that you read about the DA21 Ltd are true: quality feel/build, comfortable FOV on a crop-sensor body, warm color rendition, quick/accurate AF.... all of that is present in my copy of the lens...
but so much more - the hood/lens cap arrangement is so much better than the DA40 Limited; I never considered anything but the stock hood on the lens, and therefore the stock lens cap works perfectly...
it's light and unobtrusive on the front of my K-3, almost as much as the DA40, and makes for a nice working combination for so many things: street shooting, landscapes, candids, set-up compositions...
bokeh is just OK - you can get decent bokeh from it, but the shorter depth of field from this lens really does not lend itself to dreamy bokeh...
and don't forget about the starbursts - legendary.... almost too easy to create starbursts from almost any point of light...
only a couple of negatives: I wish the MFD was a little shorter (at about 7", it's not bad, but I kept finding myself having to recompose just because I was too close), and that it was a little faster (f3.2 is not awful, but maybe f2.8 or 2.4?)... my only complaints at all during the month...
this is an easy lens to own - not a doubt in my mind that this one is a keeper for me...
and the pictures... a few of my favorites: ".... it's another flamingo sunset....." by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr sunflowers by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr fall colors by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr black-eyed susan against the sunrise by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
the rest of my album with the DA21: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pepperberryfarm/albums/72157667854525090/with/25344046009/ | | |