Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Third-Party Pentax Lenses - Reviews and Database » Russian and Zenitar Lenses » Prime Lenses
Helios 44M-4 58mm f2 Review RSS Feed

Helios 44M-4 58mm f2

Sharpness 
 8.5
Aberrations 
 7.5
Bokeh 
 9.2
Handling 
 8.2
Value 
 9.3
Reviews Views Date of last review
6 39,118 Sat February 25, 2017
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
100% of reviewers $30.20 8.67
Helios 44M-4 58mm f2

Helios 44M-4 58mm f2
supersize
Helios 44M-4 58mm f2
supersize

Description:
"Helios-44 is a series of standard lenses for SLR cameras, produced in Soviet Union by KMZ, MMZ, Jupiter from 1958 till 1992 (2001?) and it is considered to be one of most mass produced lenses in the world. Based on the lens Biotar 2 / 58 , at the beginning was called "... cyrillic " (BioTar Krasnogorski). A fast 6-element anastigmat, it was available in both single-coated and multi-coated versions.
The name of Helios lenses are usually writen as Helios-44X-N, where X -is the index of lens mount (M for m42 thread, K for Pentax K bayonet, Д for Zenit-D bayonet) and N is a optical resolution index 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (the higher number the higher is an optical resolution of lens)."
- camerapedia.

Most incarnations of this helios don't have an A-M switch, so either "mod" the lens so it stops down (as described, for example, in this thread), or use an M42-PK adapter that holds the auto pin in eg this one. More info: see this thread.

M42 mount
6 blade iris
f2 to f16
Min focus distance < 0.5 m

Review by Jonas Rask.

Review by Shannon Ivan Walters.
Mount Type: M42 Screwmount
Price History:



Add Review of Helios 44M-4 58mm f2
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-6 of 6
New Member

Registered: January, 2017
Posts: 4
Lens Review Date: February 25, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: None indicated | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Very sharp across the board, at least on aps-c, unique bokeh
Cons: None
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 9    Value: 9    Camera Used: Canon 600d   

I was surprised to see a sharpness rating of 8.4 (at the time i wrote this) for this lens because this is my sharpest lens so far. Very sharp wide open across the frame, at least on aps-c. Some people see a softness at the edges but that's because the edges of a photo are at a greater distance to the lens than at the center where focus is usually aimed. And at wide-open depth of field is very thin and very distance-sensitive. Otherwise if you fine-tune your focus to the edge or corners of your composition, then you will find this lens still very sharp. In this photo you can count and single out every stamen in this cut-flower gerbera. Shot hand-held at 1/500 shutter speed. I may have cropped this one because closest focussing distance is about a foot and a half.

It's my favorite lens not only for portraits but for product shoots as well. Stopped down, it's surgical and yields a rich amount of details. In this photo I used it to shoot (and sell) my Auto Sears/ Sekor SX 55mm f/1.4. It was snapped away as soon as I published the ad. I think the photos lelped a lot. (I miss that lens).





Of course this lens is known for its famous swirly bokeh, which is the main reason I purchased it. Just find some foliage and use it as background and voila! Swirly bokeh. Sometimes its bokeh appears like a master's strokes in a classic impressionist painting.

The lens is a little bit on the cool side, as sometimes I needed to add a little bit of warmth in pp. Aberrations? I pick my shots the best I can which is probably the reason I haven't encountered those issues.

At the going price, there is no reason why every photographer should not have one of these in the bag. It is an amazing lens no wonder the Russians manufactured a lot of helios 44, more than any known lens in the whole world. It's my go-to lens whenever I need sharpness on near objects. I'd give it a rating of 9.6.

I have other normal lenses probably as sharp as this one. S-m-c takumar 55/1.8, Helios 77m-4, and the Zenitar-m 50/1.7. If it all came down to a horse race, all of these lenses would be at the photo-finish. The 44m-4 would probably win. But only by the skin of its teeth.
   
New Member

Registered: December, 2016
Posts: 13
Lens Review Date: February 3, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: High resolution, great value, dreamy bokeh
Cons: Flaring, ghosting hard to control
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 6    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 8    Value: 10    Camera Used: Fuji XM1, Olympus EPL5, Film camera   

Bought this lens some months ago and used it on a film camera (35mm), a Fuji-crop and a M4/3 camera. It turns into a portrait lens fov on the crop sensors.

Impressions & more high-res image samples with a film camera:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MID7Pv6owL0

Bokeh is dreamy and feels more like an F1.4 than F2. There is a bit of swirly bokeh but not as much as the earlier version of this lens like the 44-2 version. Flaring and ghosting can be strong if shot against the light. Resolution is very good at F8 and still good at F2 in the center, but everything gets fairly dreamy wide open. Build quality is very solid, the lens will last for centuries. Colors can be very intense, in particular using old film.

F2 film Ektar 100



F2 film Ektar 100


_____
On digital cameras, more impressions here
https://youtu.be/wEXfthKZuo0

F2 at Fuji XM1


F8 at Olympus EPL5 with macro tubes
   
Forum Member

Registered: December, 2016
Location: Bhubaneswar; A State in the East of India
Posts: 81
Lens Review Date: January 5, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $43.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Bokeh, Sharp, Colours
Cons: Needs some modification with certain adapters
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 6    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 9    Value: 8    Camera Used: Canon EOS 350D   

I love shooting with this lens. Own the Helios 44-2 version as well. Hope to do a head to head comparison later with both the lenses. Ergonomically I feel it's better than the more popular Helios44-2 lens. I have infinity focus with this lens adapted to my Canon with a cheap M42toEOS adapter.

The lens is very sharp at the center and has very pleasing bokeh. For anyone who loves to shoot flowers and still objects, I think you will love this lens.

   
New Member

Registered: August, 2014
Posts: 2
Lens Review Date: January 11, 2016 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $5.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Sharp excellent bokeh
Cons: cheap feeling aperture ring
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 7    Value: 10    Camera Used: A6000   

One of my favourite lenses to use sharp with excellent bokeh, great for portraits perhaps not quite as good as my 44m but this one works better, the 44m has a stiff focus ring. I had to modify the aperture pin to allow it to work in fully manual mode, its simple to do here's a video detailing how to do it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BxLnveJ2yU

I used a Zhongyi Lens Turbo ii with this lens to give it it's full frame focal length on my A6000

Overwintering Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr

Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr

Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr

Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr

Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr

Helios 44m-4 + Zhongyi Lens turbo II by Scott Hills, on Flickr
   
New Member

Registered: June, 2015
Posts: 2
Lens Review Date: December 8, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $39.99 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Beautiful bokeh and color accuracy
Cons:
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 9    Value: 9    Camera Used: A7s   

Since owning this lens for almost a year now I can honestly say this is one of the most beautiful lenses I own. I have this adapted to fit both my 5Dmii and my A7s and use it regularly for photos and video.

Wide open at f2 the bokeh is buttery and the flares are prominent but can be quite fun to play around with as shown below.




The sharpness in my eyes is flawless. Of course depending on how you control the flares your image could end up a bit soft but if you get your focus just right you can get some sharp shots.



(Keep note that all of these photos were taken at f2 resulting in pretty damn shallow focus.)

When summing up this lens, I have to say that it is one of my favorites to work with. It is sharp, easy to handle, fancy dancy with its bokeh and lens flares, it is a lens highly recommended by yours truly. Also remember, all of this cost me under $50 on ebay. That is a pretty damn good deal.
   
Site Supporter

Registered: April, 2011
Location: Lost in translation ...
Posts: 17,406
Lens Review Date: April 21, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $3.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Tank like build, sharp, bokeh ...
Cons: No A/M clutch, usually needs relube ...
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 7    Value: 10   

Bonjour,

Another thrift shop copy of the Helios "44" series ... the 44M-4 version, and this seems to be a later version which has only 6 blades as opposed to the 8 blades of the 44-M and 44-2.

No Auto/Man switch thus I had to use the barrel of a Q-tip and install to make this lens fully manual.

Will post sample images later and will give give a preliminary rating of "7" for the moment ... J

EDIT: Here are some quick snaps from the garden ... worth an "8" now ... J





Add Review of Helios 44M-4 58mm f2



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:10 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top