Author: | | Site Supporter Registered: January, 2015 Location: Sweden Posts: 338 | Review Date: March 20, 2023 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Sharpness, resolution, preset aperture, 14 blades, small and light | Cons: | For the price - none (except that it can be hard to find) | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Camera Used: KP
| | This review is for the early Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor - the zebra version with a 14 bladed iris. Notice! It has 14 aperture blades (not 15 - as some other reviews state) .
Considering the performance to price ratio, and its age, I just can not fault this lens in a single category.
In size, weight and build it's very similar to the early preset version of Asahi Takumar 105mm f2.8. Like a German sibling. Both are tiny, no weight to mention, all metal build and a preset aperture that can be trusted not to stick. The main differences are that the Meyer is significantly sharper wide open, has better contrast, more pleasing rendering in general and 6 more aperture blades. My impression is that it has better resolution too.
So my recommendation is that if you see one for sale - just grab it!
All photos wide open at f2.8: Z e n i t h [№ 1] by The Northern Recluse, on Flickr Late day walk with the Orestor by The Northern Recluse, on Flickr
| | | | | New Member Registered: March, 2016 Posts: 5 | Review Date: March 28, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $80.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Sharp, bokeh, small size | Cons: | I didn't find | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Camera Used: K1
| | It is very good lens and relativly cheap. It has very nice buble bokeh accordin design and 15blades iris.[/IMG]
| | | | New Member Registered: March, 2020 Posts: 1 | | | | Junior Member Registered: June, 2013 Posts: 37 | Review Date: February 14, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Sharpness, Bokeh, heft, Focus swing | Cons: | none | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax K-1ii
| | ≈For the price and it's age, this is a fantastic find. Aperature ring has 'smooth clicks' and the focus swing of 320 degrees allows for really fine focus. I just received this lens and have it mounted with a genuine Pentax M42-K adapter ring which mounts like a charm (no key required). The aperture pin on the back sticks out quite a bit and was binding on removal of the lens - be gentle and with a bit of wiggle, it comes off. In order to use the lens in T-AV mode (aperture set manually on the lens and shutter auto by the body), the lens pin on the mount has to be pushed in permanently by either gluing it, putting tape over it, or what I did.... I bent it with needle nose pliers ever so slightly and pushed it in, so it stays in.
Now the lens works as in aperture priority (T-AV mode) with auto shutter and manual focus. (The alternate was to use the aperture preview button on the base of the lens with a free finger each time you focus and shoot - awkward to say the least)!
Here are a couple first shots... I'm pretty happy for the price to have a ~60 year old lens (slightly older than me), that works like a charm! I can't believe that I'm getting so into vintage lenses on such an advanced body!!! But that's part of the fun of owning a Pentax! | | | | | New Member Registered: May, 2013 Location: Jakarta Posts: 2 | Review Date: December 4, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | sharpness, bokeh, deep color rendering | Cons: | price | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 8
Value: 5
Camera Used: K5
| | have the preset type with 15 blades(?), M42, this lens can produce beautifull deep color image, and also has all meyer's lens bokeh character
you will not be disappointed to have this lens, highly recommended
samples shots are here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/roe_groho/sets/72157647732277702/ | | | | Inactive Account Registered: April, 2011 Location: near Berlin Posts: 9 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: January 24, 2012 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | build, bokeh, size, weight, sharp stopped down, fast, fluid aperture settings possible | Cons: | sharpness wide open, needs good hood, 1.1m close focus distance | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
| | This a gift from my grandpa. At first I was bit unsure if this small lens is really worth to adapt it. But it is! I had an adapter and a good hood at home, so I tried and I was surprised positively - nice handling and focussing, good IQ stopped down a bit, perfect bokeh and it is sooooo tiny! It really is nothing for closeups but perfect for potraiture. Stopping down will also help to eliminate some CAs. I think it can survive another 40 years!
| | | | Junior Member Registered: September, 2009 Location: Galati on Danube-Romania Posts: 33 | Review Date: November 6, 2010 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Time resistance (40 years old, aprox.), very good sharp and bokeh | Cons: | Difficult precise manual focus without split focus screen | | I used this lens in the slide Era (1976-1989 for me) on Zenit E Russian camera. A great repro of colors and very fine bokeh and sharpness.
I all agree with rfranner script on this lens. A particular optical quality is the lent decrease of clarity in front and back of the plane of focus in comparison with new lenses for digital. That means if you don't focus perfect on the subject, the blur is not intense and you can recover the clarity in p.p. Is a very good impression of the real sight in the photos taken with it. Examples are more than thousand words:
There are some p.p. but if there is no good info in original shot, you can't obtain a good p.p.
I take shots with my Samsung GX20 and Pentax K7 and this lens has a good color rendering, good contrast (specially with K7 with 0 adjustments sliders).
Others examples: http://paunel.aminus3.com/image/2010-06-27.html http://paunel.aminus3.com/image/2010-06-28.html http://paunel.aminus3.com/image/2010-06-23.html http://paunel.aminus3.com/image/2010-06-24.html http://paunel.aminus3.com/image/2010-06-22.html | | | | Inactive Account Registered: January, 2010 Location: Cookstown Posts: 7 | Review Date: January 23, 2010 | Recommended | Price: $100.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Tactile rendering; outstanding bokeh | Cons: | needs post production to really shine, fully manual operation | | I see one of you has stumbled on one the best-kept secrets: the outstanding performance of Meyer Optik lenses. This East German brand (long defunct) laboured under the shadow of Carl Zeiss Jena, even in its own country. Besides the lens you're reviewing, I've managed to collect the 50mm f1.8, yet another 100mm 2.8 (its predecessor, the Trioplan, a triplet: very different rendering, spooky bokeh, less smooth, but funky), the 135mm f2.8 (MONSTER bokeh!), and the 200mm f4. They're all gems, and very under-rated. By the way, the circularity of the diaphragm ensures round instead of polygonal out-f-focus highlights; but it doesn't otherwise affect the bokeh. That depends on the lens design and coatings. In general, aspherical elements trade off distortion and clarity for bokeh.
Compared to an excellent modern lens, in general, you'll find the rendering of the Meyer family somewhat bland (often easily fixed with auto contrast in Photoshop) and in need of sharpening. Also, the telephotos can be somewhat prone to flare.
I find that they produce incomparable bokeh, and it seems to survive the sharpening process in PP (whereas the output from modern lenses quickly gets grainy and harsh).
At the end of the day, when I want to feel the texture of the subject just by looking at the image, I reach for a Meyer Optik lens more often than not.
They're still a relative bargain on ebay (unlike Carl Zeiss Jena, which now commands inflated prices); but make sure the version of the lens has a manual-auto switch for use (in fully stopped-down mode) on your DSLR.
| | | | Senior Member Registered: July, 2008 Location: France Posts: 128 | Review Date: January 16, 2010 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Very well built but not heavy, sharpness, color rendering | Cons: | Well, M42, so no f/stop control with the camera dial ... | | I bought this lens quite by mistake, mostly for curiosity because it didn't cost too much and i wanted to test it against my SMC Takumar 105/2.8 ...
Well, after a few shots i changed my mind. The lens is incredibly sharp, presenting a very good contrast, although not as high as a Zeiss lens, and has a little cooler color rendering when compared to other Pentax lenses (notably, the 105/2.8).
Nevertheless, it's a joy to use on my K10D, since it is the only M42 lens from my set that perfectly meters with my camera. The bokeh is really pleasant too, most probably because of the high number of diaphragm blades. And the lens is perfectly usable wide open, IMHO, if you keep in mind the razor thin DOF at f/2.8 ...
Definitively, a good companion for my SMC Tak 105/2.8 ...
| | | | Veteran Member Registered: August, 2008 Location: Greece and UK Posts: 309 | Review Date: October 19, 2009 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Well made,solid, sharp | Cons: | Needs a good hood. Strictly for MF | | I bought this lens for £10 in a Charity shop a few years ago. It had the start of some fungus on the front and rear elements but was otherwise in good condition. I found it very easy to take apart and clean (lots and lots of unscrewing) but the results have been well worth it.
I did run a comparison with the SMC 135 f/3.5 and, in my opinion, this lens outshines the Pentax in all areas - especially the bokeh - probably due to the 14 blade aperture as against the 6 blades of the Pentax. Strangely, although it's not multi-coated, the lens has never shown much flare or CA and compared to the Pentax, produces a somewhat 'cool' image tone. It's also pretty sharp wide open which becomes excellent if stopped down a little.
This is the earlier 'Zebra' version (it's name becomes obvious if you look at it) which spawned a long line of popular lenses such as the 'Pentacon'.
I would give this lens a worthy all round 8 and IMO is worth buying if you can find a good dust/fungus free copy.
| | |