New Member Registered: April, 2012 Location: Prague Posts: 18 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: May 28, 2012 | Recommended | Price: $50.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | Build Quality, Sharpness | Cons: | Better if there is a Pentax FF | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 10
| | This M42 lens is too good with its price and works flawless.
Its max aperture is f2.8 and it is reasonable to use it. F4 gives image sharpness that surprise me.
135mm in Pentax K-5 is too much far for portrait and I hope Pentax will release Full-Frame soon.
The colour is fine, I think it is a little but under saturation but it is not the problem with me.
Build quality is great, solid and attractive.
I can only recommend this lens !
| |
Site Supporter Registered: November, 2012 Location: North Wales Posts: 2,859 | Review Date: April 12, 2013 | Recommended | Price: $20.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | IQ, handling | Cons: | slight but persistent CA, CFD not very close | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 10
| | I tried a 2.8/135 before, but that hanimar didn't impress - inherently sharp particularly at middle f numbers but I was disappointed with it wide open and with strong persistent CA. My feeling was that the 135's, like the 50mm tessar, is a known formula since forever and proven IQ is out there...
So prompted by the good review below I have acquired the Panagor*. And so far I am pleased. Its a beautiful example of a classic metal'n glass lens (10 for handling). This was in immaculate condition.
Taking it out on bright cloudy = max CA type of day only suffered a distinct purpling of backlit branches at 2.8. Distinctly softer wide open see sample pic but not too bad (miles better than the hanimar mentioned above). At f8 this lens is sharp. It would be interesting to compare with eg CZJ ..(UPDATE: see below)
One minor gripe. My lens has a silver trim at the top end of the focus ring . This came loose.
Lens in pic above also seems to have a hood - not mine.
BTW: 55mm filter, 8 blade iris.
Kiron colour...
f2.8 ~ 50% crop (slight sharpening to compensate, but otherwise off the card jpg) using monopod.
f8 ~ 50% crop
UPDATE. 12/13
I now have a CZJ 135 F3.5 sonnar to make a comparison with.
f2.8 100% centre crop
f4
f8
Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 @ f3.5
At f4 the Panagor is a bit softer than the CZJ at f3.5 but at f8 the Panagor is distinctly better. The lack of contrast at f2.8 is very apparent with this subject and (dull winter) lighting conditions. At f8 the two lenses were pretty much equal IMO. The Panagor had a noticeably cooler tone. Overall the CZJ performs more consistently over its aperture range. I think 8/10 is about right for the Panagor, certainly I really like its performance at middling f's. | |
Pentaxian Registered: May, 2012 Location: --- Posts: 6,802 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: October 28, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $20.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Wel Built | Cons: | sub par sharpness purple fringing | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 8
Camera Used: K-5
| | This is a 135mm lens of which there are many cheap options out there. Amongst these it doesn't really shine. it's neutral rendering and colours en purple fringing even stopped down, a bit boring Bokeh and medium sharpness make it so so. Edit In retrospect I may have been a bit harsh on this one. I've improved my score a bit.
It is very well built though. Still smooth like a Pentax or Takumar after all these years and you can get some OK pictures out of it. It can focus to up to 1.3 meters (contrary to the description above, I think I haven an earlier version). So it is also a nice lens for close ups. Mine is not marked PMC but I can see at least two different coatings.
crop: | |
New Member Registered: May, 2021 Posts: 15 | Review Date: August 28, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $15.00
| Rating: 8 |
Pros: | Smooth focus ring, nice colors, overall build quality | Cons: | CA | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 9
Camera Used: Sony A7III
| | This lens is great for video! The focus ring is one of the smoothest I've ever had. Even compared to a Takumar 135 this thing has a smoother focus. I don't know what kind of grease they put in there, but it's brilliant!
The only downside is that chromatic aberration becomes quite visible when zoomed in.
Overall I really like the lens. I compared it with a Takumar 135mm in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPPuoaD0SHM | |