Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Third-Party Pentax Lenses - Reviews and Database » Miscellaneous Lenses » Prime Lenses
Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8 Review RSS Feed

Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8

Sharpness 
 8.0
Aberrations 
 5.7
Bokeh 
 8.7
Handling 
 9.3
Value 
 8.3
Reviews Views Date of last review
4 24,077 Tue February 25, 2020
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
100% of reviewers $34.50 7.50
Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8

Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8
supersize
Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8
supersize
Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8
supersize

Description:
Revue Revuenon RB (only a retail brand - lenses were manufactured by others).

Pentax K fitting - fully manual

Filter Diameter: 52mm
Min. Focus: 150cm/5ft
Max. Magnification: ?
Weight: 382g
Mount Type: Pentax K
Price History:



Add Review of Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-4 of 4
New Member

Registered: November, 2013
Posts: 14
Review Date: February 25, 2020 Recommended | Price: $30.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: very sharp lens
Cons: some visible CA's wide open at hard contrast contures against the light
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: k-x k200d k-5 k-s1 fuji x-t100   

PAY ATTENTION: there are a lot of kinds of REVUENON 2.8/135 of different producers - very fines and really weak ones !!! In www.allphotolenses REVUENON 2.8/135 gets valuation of 4,5/5 points, i.e.9/10 points for optical quality !!!

Mines is a PK-mount AUTO REVEUNON MC in 4/4 lens construction with CA's wide open when shooting stars - a normal phenomena without an achromatic element. I've bought this lens with good blue coating (perhaps a later model with changed lens construction ?) - So I've got some lovely blue CA's wide open at f 2.8 when stars were shooted.


But stopped down to f 5.6-11 these CA's will disappear, nearly totally


++ very good sharpness beginning from f4 to f 5.6 = it is a good performer for portrait photography

++ very nice bokeh

+ few flare, good contrast, stopped down a few to f 4- f 5.6

O wide open blue CA's in the center and red in the corners, will disappear when stopping down to f 5.6-8

++ excellent color rendition

PAY ATTENTION, in order to buy a good lens with blue coating, because - like PORST - REVUE had changed suppliers very often, some came from former GDR and Japan - and these lenses are really good

I use it for portraits and its "plastic brother" (see below) for macro shootings with an achromatic focal reductor - self made by one of the binocular 8x30 top / front lenses, fitted into a PK- and a M42- macro ring ; 8.5 points totally

Remark: many new lenses with golden rings and highest prices have wide open similar CA's

****************************************************

MY TIP: PAY ATTENTION

****************************************************

I've bought an old AUTO REVUENON M42 2.8/135 - made of plastics (very similar to "Porst TELE"/ Ennalyt and ISCO plastic performance (all 4 lenses produced by ISCO or ENNA?) - but 5/4 construction with one achromate element. These lenses are very sharp and nearly without CA's at f 5.6 - f 11. The above mentioned metal version for outdoor, the cheaper plastic version for close ups and with macro ring for macro shootings of butterflies f.e. !!!

Ah - with the self scotched focal reductor a 7/5 elements construction and as result brighter 2.4/110 mm macro lens with extreme sharpness and no visible CAs - for peanuts as costs !!!

PS. oh - for astrophotography you must take a MF TAKUMAR 2.5/135 stopped down to f4-5.6 or the famous tokina 4/100-300 with ED element !!! No more blue CA's visible - ISO 51.600 highest contrast as filter with k-5, k-s1 and K-s2 and max. 1-2 sec. - wonderfull photos of orion nebula and of plejades (even without astro tracer) possible. Try it.

(I'd got with M42 screw mount a REVUENON SPEZIAL 2.8/135 in a set with a REVUENON SPEZIAL 2,8/35 in a blue case with visible optical design on the package - both terrible sharpness 6 or 7 points with strong corner CAs 2 oder 3 points - at once casted away)

FLICKR sample photos are extremely sharp and without any visible CAs, which confirms my recommendation
   
New Member

Registered: February, 2016
Posts: 3
Review Date: February 22, 2016 Recommended | Price: $48.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: price, pk mount, in-build lens hood, bokeh, smooth focus and aperature ring
Cons: huge CA at 2.8, only 1EV steps, not too sharp
Sharpness: 7    Aberrations: 6    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 9    Camera Used: Pentax K-x   

Here are my Sample images taken with Pentax K-x and macro tubes:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/130-lens-sample-photo-archive/314752-auto...m-f2-8-pk.html
   
Senior Member

Registered: October, 2014
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 121
Review Date: February 15, 2016 Recommended | Price: $25.00 | Rating: 6 

 
Pros: bright
Cons: CA
Sharpness: 7    Aberrations: 2    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 8    Value: 6    Camera Used: Pentax K-30   

Initially I bought the lens with wish to use it for astrophotography. The hood was a bit bent, the focusing ring was a bit free and the glass had a small scratch. The focusing was not very exact.
That got better after cleaning the lens, however, it is absolutely not suited for astrophotography - huge CA (http://media.365project.org/1/6248318_abfiktvz48_l.jpg).
Quite nice for simple photos (https://flic.kr/p/u121jr). However it is still looking for best place in my bag...
   
Veteran Member

Registered: July, 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 344
Review Date: May 14, 2010 Recommended | Price: $35.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: cheap, small, well built, pull-out hood
Cons: strong PF wide open, MFD of 1.5m/ 5ft, only 1EV clicks

Bought the lens out of frustration because I lost several auctions on the SMC Pentax 2.5/135. But when it arrived I was pleseantly surprised. High quality feel.
Distortion is way lower than on the DA 55-300 I owned at that time, sharpness way higher (see comparison).

Rating - 1 to 10 with 10 being the best possible

Build qualtiy: 9
Focusing: 10 - long focus throw, well damped, ring fitted with ribbed rubber
Size: 9 - very small lens
Aperture ring: 8 - posive clicks but only 1 EV steps
Sharpness: 7 - soft at f/2.8 clearly improving at f/4, absolutely okay till f/11
Edge falloff: low - it's a full frame lens
Bokeh/blurring: 7 - nothing special
Aberrations: 6 - strong coma and/or purple fringing when shooting wide open in certain conditions like backlit scenes, high contrast
Contrast: 7 - not as contrasty as Pentax lenses but fixeable in PP
Colour rendering: 7 - cooler than Pentax lenses, light purplish tint - fixeable with white balance settings

Overall value: 7 (solid)

Pictures taken with this lens:


Comparison Pentax DA 55-300 vs. Revue:
Pentax at 135mm f/4.5

Pentax at 135mm f/8


Revue at f/2.8

Revue at f/4

Revue at f/8


"Real world" comparison
Pentax at 120mm f/8

Revue at f/8


If the thumbnail images don't work:
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049270/135-2.8-F2.8.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049306/135-2.8-F4.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049200/55-300-120mm-F8.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049232/135mm-2.8-F8.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049333/Pentax-55-300-135mm-F4.5.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049356/Pentax-55-300-135mm-F8.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049379/Revue-135mm-F2.8.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049439/Revue-135mm-F4.jpg.html
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-4049463/Revue-135mm-F8.jpg.html
Add Review of Revue Revuenon RB 135mm F2.8



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top