Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Third-Party Pentax Lenses - Reviews and Database » Ricoh Lenses » Prime Lenses
Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4 Review RSS Feed

Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4

Sharpness 
 9.0
Aberrations 
 9.0
Bokeh 
 8.5
Handling 
 8.0
Value 
 9.5
Reviews Views Date of last review
5 43,099 Wed May 2, 2018
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
60% of reviewers $57.50 8.20
Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4

Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4
supersize
Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4
supersize

Description:
Manual focus
Price History:



Add Review of Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-5 of 5
New Member

Registered: April, 2017
Posts: 8
Lens Review Date: May 2, 2018 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: $40.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: good sharpness once stopped down, handy
Cons: very bad fully open, weak at shorter distances
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 9    Value: 9    Camera Used: Pentax K-50, Fujifilm XT-20   

This lens sports f/1.4 aperture, but it is so soft till f/2.8 that the advantage of the large aperture is gone, and that's the point for having such lens.
In my (not so professional) tests, I also noted that my copy performs better at infinity than at closer range, at that's a pity because I was looking for "the perfect" portrait lens. In this test, here, indeed I crowned (for APS-C), the Minolta Rokkor MD 50/1.4, that can even do slightly better than the Pentax-FA 50/2.8 macro, previously my sharpest lens. You can find more here: http://www.rustichelli.net/Hobbies/Photography/LensTests/50mm-primes-lens-te...enses-test.php (there are more optics involved in the test).
A good thing of this lens is that it features a true Pentax-K mount without Ricoh "variations" and pin/contacts issues, but I'd recommend spending a little more for the classic Pentax-A 50/1.7 which performs generally better.
   
Forum Member

Registered: May, 2014
Posts: 59
Lens Review Date: June 1, 2014 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $95.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: sharpness, bokeh, aperture, build quality, price
Cons: flares, reflections, slow focussing
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 7    Value: 10    Camera Used: K5   

My reason to buy this lens was to have a good and affordable lens for shooting under bad light conditions and a standard lens to leave on the camera for all conditions except rainy weather and pictures impossible for this focal length.

While it proved itself perfectly fit for taking images at night and indoors, the slower manual operation, the equivalent focal length of 75 mm at APS-C and the sensitivity towards flares and reflections can limit itīs usage as a standard snapshot lens. Thatīs not making it bad, you just have to know how to use it.

In a good condition the lens is more than worth the money for 70 Euro. When you consider comparable lenses (which of course support automatic programs and autofocus) like the Pentax SMC-FA 50mm / f1,4 for about 330 Euro, the Sigma 50mm F1,4 EX DG HSM for 450 bucks and the Pentax SMC-DA 55mm / f1,4 SDM (weather sealed) for around 730 Euro.

I could not test these other lenses against the Rikenon, but I can say that you get a usable lens with it which can deliver a very good image quality for little money when you are willing to live without auto modes on your camera and autofocus and consider the few weaknesses before hitting the shutter button.

Good:
- excellent image quality possible
- usage under low light conditions
- heavy and solid build quality
- cheap purchase
- little purple and only moderate green CAs

Not so good:
- tendency towards flares and
- bluesh reflections in some conditions
- focussing for portraits can be difficult

A more detailed review with pictures can be found here: http://universalfocus.deviantart.com/journal/Old-manual-lens-on-a-modern-DSLR-403093763

Night shot with this lens:

   
New Member

Registered: July, 2013
Posts: 3
Lens Review Date: July 31, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $35.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Build quality,colors,bokeh,resolution
Cons: No 1/2 f-stops

I don't think the flair is a problem.I like some flair but with a decent hood it's gone.
This lens is quite sharp even at f/1,4 as you can see in my example,and I love the
bokeh.

   
Pentaxian

Registered: February, 2012
Posts: 364

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: December 27, 2012 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: None indicated | Rating: 7 

 
Pros:
Cons:

Quite sharp from f2.8 but not focusing correctly in the viewfinder of my K5-IIs. So, wide apertures are really tricky to use. This may be a camera issue but Pentax DSLR users have to be warned that they may not be able to focus accurately with this lens.

Few shots using the Ricoh 50XR (25% of original size and jpg conversion from the camera) (as I said the focus from the AF indicator is wrong on my K5. I don't have this problem with other lenses but I have no other f1.4 lens to test with).

f1.4:


f2:


f2.8:


f4:



Example of photo using this lens :




I'll add few resolution tests later to complete this review
   
Site Supporter

Registered: May, 2010
Location: 1hr north of PDX
Posts: 3,764

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: July 9, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: bright, fairly compact, seems decent at 1.4 - and a bargain
Cons: no 1/2 stop clicks, veiling flare

More tests may alter the score..

My copy is an Auto Sears MC but looks identical to images of this XR, down to the white button and '50mm' text. It takes 52mm filters and has no half-stop clicks, just like my Rikenon-P 50/2. Weighs 260g and has eight aperture blades.

I was quite surprised that my bid didn't max out on auction, really got away with one here. Initial tests are quite promising; this should be an easy keeper. I will do more daylight tests to look for surprises, but a test-shot out the window looked great for color and contrast. A very talented lens, and given the price it has to round up to a 9.

compared to my rikenon 50/2


wide-open test in low light


Edit - subsequent tests force me to deduct a point. The veiling flare is extreme, no surprise but problematic. I also note that when the scene becomes too bright for the meter, shutter is set at 0.3s - I see this is a k-x "feature" though when light is beyond shutter capability.



2nd Edit -- I've noticed that when shooting close and fully opened, the hexagon in the viewfinder lights up to confirm focus, but I need to dial focus back a smidge (or use live view) to nail it. This may be a case where the K-5 AF point is not quite inside the center square, so not necessarily a lens issue. Once focus is nailed it's quite impressively sharp. It would be excellent on the K-01 where all views are live ones!
Add Review of Ricoh 50mm XR Rikenon f/1.4



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top