| Author: | | Pentaxian Registered: May, 2008 Location: Maryland Posts: 558
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: April 19, 2012 | Not Recommended | Price: $479.00
| Rating: 1 |
| Pros: | NONE | | Cons: | It's a Sigma? | | Sharpness: 1
Aberrations: 1
Bokeh: 1
Handling: 1
Value: 1
Autofocus: 1
New Or Used: New
| |
A copy of my review submitted at B&H photo of this lens. Would give a big fat 0 if i could.Lens will not focus,in manual focus it must be set at the 3 foot mark to get an in focus photo of what should be ifinity.It is obvious to anyone who is not legally blind that it is focusing past the true infinity point but after sending it to sigma for repair with this info provided to them they adjust the Auto focus to specs and send it back with the same problem.Obviously did not even test it before returning.Sigma says it's Pentax fault for not putting focus adjustment in the software of my camera.Really?I'm out shipping cost to send it back and still without a lens 2 weeks later.I think i bought two Sigma's,the first one and the last one!!!You can't judge the cost of the lens until you find out how many times you'll have to eat the shipping sending it back!!
Accessories I Recommend::
A towel to cry on?
Two asprin for the headache
Some extra cash to return defective product  | | | | | | | New Member Registered: July, 2011 Location: Bangkok Posts: 5 | | Review Date: August 3, 2011 | Not Recommended | Price: $479.00
| Rating: 6 |
| Pros: | Nice weight, size, ergonomics, AF speed, takes filters | | Cons: | Colors and contrast unattractive, images lack resolution/sharpness | |
I bought this lens about three weeks ago, and have taken it out on as many photo shoots. It performs well under certain lighting conditions, but not many. The colors appear dull to me, and the images lack sharpness. Maybe it's the unit I received, since there certainly seems to be a significant quality control issue with this lens (check out the reviews on Amazon), and you'll immediately see what I mean).
For some sample photos, please see http://www.flickr.com/photos/jdforgotson/sets/72157627219872175/with/6003555639/.
What you see here has a lot of post-processing. Even considering the hours of work I put into these shots, I'm really less than thrilled with the results. The pre-processing shots were just too horrible to put up. Of course, if anyone's interested in seeing them, please ask and I'll post some of them, too.
| | | | | Site Supporter Registered: December, 2016 Posts: 96
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 22, 2023 | Recommended | Price: $135.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharp, pleasing colors, wide zoom range with minimal distortion | | Cons: | My copy always focus hunts as soon as I turn on my K3-II | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 8
Value: 8
Camera Used: Pentax K3-II
Autofocus: 9
New Or Used: Used
| |
Dear Board,
With Fall colors peaking here in central Pennsylvania I wanted an ultra-wide lens to use on my K3-II.
One came available on Ebay from a Japanese seller at what I figured was a pretty fair and reasonable price. I hemmed and hawed on buying it, but when the seller dropped the price a bit for me I figured, why not?
I am very happy with the lens I received. I enjoy the 15mm equivalent FOV it provides, and find the total zoom range suitable for my scenic and landscape needs. Any aberrations or vignetting are easily corrected using the available profiles in Lightroom Classic, or DXO. It's not a $ 600.00 plus lens, but it does well for my intended uses. I think it might also do well for many others because here is the USA at least, it is very hard to find at any of the used camera retailers I often shop.
Regards,
Tim Murphy
Harrisburg PA 
 | | | | | New Member Registered: April, 2022 Posts: 12 | | Review Date: May 6, 2022 | Recommended | Price: $170.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Exciting compositions possible with this lens.Well built | | Cons: | issues at wide end inconsistent results | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 5
Bokeh: 4
Handling: 8
Value: 9
Camera Used: k-x k-r k30
Autofocus: 6
New Or Used: Used
| |
This lens captures my interest and it's hard to put it down. There were two available at a reputable online store.
I chose the " mint " sample and immediately checked for decentering. It was decentered. So I then spent days uming and aring Should I return it and try the other one?
Whilst I was making my mind up I couldn't put the lens down as I was getting super sharp but also amazing compositions since it has small minimum focus distance. Cheekily I held on to it and ordered the second sample. This one turned out to be a later version, I think, because the Sigma lens cap was now a centre pinch style.
This one doesn't have as much decentering as the other one but it seems a bit less competent at 10mm ( quite soft towards both edges). At 11+ it is superb ( as the other one was really apart from the edge issue ) .
So I am wondering if maybe Sigma reset their assembly machinery at around 2008 when according to reports the centre pinch cap was introduced.
So I kept the second one and returned the first.
My thoughts are ( and they are guesses ) most of these lenses are slightly decentered but the post 2008 ones have been quality checked for this or at least the assembly process was modified. In so doing the lenses might be slightly less good in other respects for example a bit of field curvature.
Anyway, what is indisputable is that this lens is capable of transforming your photography and has had more impact on my hobby than any of my other lenses.
It's a great lens despite its age.
| | | | | | | Site Supporter Registered: May, 2016 Location: Bristol, Tennessee Posts: 369 | | Review Date: January 4, 2021 | Recommended | Price: $124.99
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | super wide, great value | | Cons: | soft | | Sharpness: 6
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Camera Used: k3
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: Used
| |
This is by far the best lens value I've ever gotten. I got a well kept, used copy via eBay, because my DA* 16-50 just wasn't wide enough to capture the interior real estate shots I needed on my K3. It's also easy to handle for a zoom lens, and doesn't take up much room in the bag. Images are decent, usable for my needs, but soft. Although I haven't used it much yet, I might just need to find the sweet spot. If you need decent wide shots on the cheap, this may be the lens for you.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: February, 2007 Location: Midwest Coastal Region USA Posts: 426
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 27, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Sharpness, Color Rendering | | Cons: | Heavy, Slight CA and PF | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: K-5, K20D
Autofocus: 9
New Or Used: Used
| |
This copy of the 10-20mm Sigma lens is sharp at f8 and not bad wide open. This copy was sharp from 10 to 20mm. Color rendering is excellent with good saturation. Focus is quick and smooth. The lens did show a bit of PF and CA depending on the angle of the sun at times but nothing serious. The lens is heavy so if you desire a small light wide angle lens the DA21 or DA15 Ltd may be a better choice.
 | | | | | Veteran Member Registered: June, 2015 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 791
2 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 28, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $180.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | cheap, sharp, takes filters | | Cons: | some flaws in the 10-13mm range | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 9
Camera Used: K-5
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: Used
| |
This is a pretty cheap APS-C wide angle. For the cost, it is outstanding. It's hard to find fault with it. It is super-wide, and super-fun. For the casual landscape shooter, this is an amazing lens and I don't really find myself craving more expensive wide-angle lenses after getting this one.
It takes filters, so you can pop on an ND filter or polarizer. Beware that because it is quite wide, a normal polarizer will show uneven sky colours due to the wide range of angles at which light enters this lens. B+W supposedly makes a closer-sitting filter that ameliorates this somewhat but I've not tried it. Also, you can still use a regular polarizer if you're not shooting into pure blue skies (for example, if you want to cancel some reflections).
Let's talk about sharpness. In the center and midframes, it's pretty sharp. As I mentioned in the top of the review, the edge performance is pretty weak at the wider 10-13mm range. That, however, is improved a little upon stopping down. Also, at 14mm at above, it's pretty strong all around. Still, I wouldn't hesitate to use the 10-13mm range since for many compositions the very edges might not really have as much cool stuff in them. Overall, despite the weaknesses, even the widest setting can still make for interesting shots. In the evening, using a tripod at a narrower aperture will help tremendously.
The autofocus works well. Because the lens is so wide, you don't really need it to be top-notch to get sharp shots. Manual focus also works well too. For landscapes however, setting this thing up on a tripod and using Live View is still important.
The hood is a petal one. It snaps on and off easily.
What about flare? This lens handles flare pretty well. It does not lose contrast when shot into the sun. The flare is well-controlled, and produces minimal effects.
If you want to know the most serious downside to this lens as a landscape lens, it's the sunstars with narrow apertures. This lens has six aperture blades, and produces mediocre, uneven sunstars. I really like shooting into the sun, so I am a little disappointed with the look sometimes.
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: July, 2008 Location: Sammamish, WA Posts: 161 | | Review Date: August 2, 2018 | Recommended | Price: $300.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | sharpness, color | | Cons: | none | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 10
Autofocus: 9
New Or Used: New
| |
This lens is one of my favorites, it is so wide its crazy, and very sharp.
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: September, 2014 Location: Nelson Posts: 266
3 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: February 1, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $195.00
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Image Quality | | Cons: | None | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 5
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-r
Autofocus: 10
New Or Used: 10
| |
Started out hunting for a Pentax 10-17 at a reasonable price. This came up and I took a gamble.
It's not without it's faults, soft corners wide-open wide @ 10mm, but I think that's more about the way it has to be manufactured to offer a non-fisheye FOV at this focal length.
Surprised to see comments re. colour-cast and overall colour -suspect a bad copy?
It shines shut down a little @ 10mm; these examples were taken at that.
 | | | | | New Member Registered: January, 2015 Posts: 15 | | Review Date: October 13, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $200.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Good construction, solid feel, good accesories | | Cons: | Weird coating on the body | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 6
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax K-7, Pentax K-r
Autofocus: 9
New Or Used: Used
| |
The lens is great, I bought it as my first wide-angle-zoom, and I was really impressed. It's fast on the K-7, probably faster on newer bodies. The case is a great bonus for it's price. I recommend using it with a filter, as it can attract dust very easy. Relatively small.
 Autumn by Albert Dobrin, on Flickr
 University by Albert Dobrin, on Flickr
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: September, 2013 Location: Pasadena, CA Posts: 1,126 | | Review Date: September 6, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $300.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | sharp in the center, mid-range and stopped down, good IQ overall | | Cons: | soft corners wide open, color cast, relatively poor color | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 10
Value: 8
Camera Used: k-3, k-30
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: Used
| |
Toyota Camry of lenses. It's a pretty good lens and does it's job well. It's good enough that I don't see a reason to exchange it, but if I had some money to spare, I would.
My biggest gripe is a color cast and overall quality of color that this lens produces. Because of this and slow aperture on the long end I tend to use it less than my other lenses.
| | | | | Pentaxian Registered: August, 2013 Location: Iloilo City Posts: 2,276 | | Review Date: July 19, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $412.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | Great value, bang for a buck. Sharp, quick focus. Great image quality | | Cons: | Some distortion, not WR | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Autofocus: 9
New Or Used: New
| |
If it's possible, it would be a 9.5 or a 9.75. It's a perfect zoom for street photography though fixed wide angle to semi wides are recommended. Sharp ay f8 and up and quick to focus. Great image quality. I love this lens. I highly recommend it.
| | | | | New Member Registered: July, 2015 Posts: 7 | | Review Date: July 14, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $280.00
| Rating: 9 |
| Pros: | | | Cons: | | | Sharpness: 8
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: k-50
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: New
| |
Good ultra wide angla, sharp and good build quality
| | | | | Senior Member Registered: February, 2012 Location: Houston Posts: 129 | | Review Date: March 21, 2015 | Recommended | Price: $363.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Sharp, very wide, versatile | | Cons: | size, distortion at Ultra wide end | | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 9
Value: 8
Camera Used: k5
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: Used
| |
Great lens for landscape, architecture and pictures in cramped spaces. Very sharp especially on a tripod. It also focuses close which is useful in tight spaces.
I was not fond of the size of this lens as it is really big using a 77mm filter. I also did not like the distortion at the 10mm end.
| | | | | Veteran Member Registered: May, 2010 Posts: 7,403
10 users found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 4, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $304.00
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | Incredibly wide field of view | | Cons: | Incredibly wide field of view, natural distortions, somewhat soft | | Sharpness: 7
Aberrations: 7
Bokeh: 8
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: K-5 II
Autofocus: 8
New Or Used: Used
| |
After seeing numerous photographs taken at wide angle for years, I've wanted an ultra wide angle lens.
I had no idea for what I was in until I actually obtained one!
First off, I love taking photos of sunsets and clouds.. big sky photos and displaying object scale. For this an ultrawide can get you what you want.
However, I had no idea the amount of work involved in avoiding distortion when at the wide side of this lens (10mm)... you must be careful not to pitch up or down the camera from the subject or you will get massive image distortion! This can be played to your advantage but it can also be simply annoying too. Also close up, objects take on a slight to moderate fisheye effect almost. To really get this effect though, the lens would have to be able to focus even closer than it can.
Also, 10mm is simply REALLY INCREDIBLY wide! This is fantastic if you are in a tight place and want to have much of the space in the image (interior shots -- especially in realty or the sort). However, outside in larger space, this means you are losing detail of your subject simply from covering more area in the field of view.
For landscapes and such, the longer end of this lens is probably going to be the smarter option (focal length wise). Forget about Panoramas with the wider end btw. In my experiences, way too much distortion means you will have headaches getting images to properly overlap.. even with distortion correct enabled (LR user here). Plus with distortion correction enabled, means you will be removing a portion of the actual image in crop to accommodate said distortion (it can be rather severe on the edges and somewhat complex). So just use the mid to long side of this lens if you are considering panoramas or landscapes with more detail. The issue there is this Sigma 10-20mm lens tends to be softer in the mid to longer side of the focal range. I think my 18-135 might be sharper and around the same barrel distortion amount as this Sigma lens (which is rather minimal on long side of the 10-20) at 18-20mm. Also, you're getting f/5.6 on the long end of this lens.. so forget about it if you are in a low lit space with no tripod.
I hope this review makes sense.. The lens isn't a dog.. by any means.. it is rather sharp stopped down to F/8 and F/11 but you might want to handle an Ultra wide lens before buying just to ensure this is really your cup of tea. It is the only lens where I really had to practice using it and work through the dynamics of such a particular focal range and the properties of this particular lens -- didn't come automatically.
This is a chubby lens but it is plastic so it is lightweight. Some might find that a flaw, but I think had it been metal, this would have been a brick to hold! 77mm threads means screw-on filters are going to be expensive. I use a Cokin P series step down ring and the square filters instead. That way, I can use all of my ND filters without having to get individual ones for each thread size. Just a cheap step down ring for the filter holder (bought a ton of those step down rings on ebay for next to nothing).
Also, this lens WILL flare in bright light sources (namely the sun!). You won't get a super awesome copy that doesn't flare. This lens flares. Expect it to and plan accordingly. If you take lots of shots with the sun visible or just off camera, and don't want to Post Process the flare effect out, look for a different lens.
I'm glad to have this lens and will get much use out of it.. but I don't think it will be the most affixed lens on my camera as I thought it might have been before receiving it. 10mm, however, is fantastic for big sky photography, massively large landscapes (where detail isn't the leading factor), interior spaces, creative effects, and generally projecting scale of objects. I find, as a result, this Sigma 10-20mm makes up for it's limitations.
| | |
