Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Third-Party Pentax Lenses - Reviews and Database » Sigma Lenses » Legacy Zoom Lenses
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC Review RSS Feed

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC

Sharpness 
 8.5
Aberrations 
 8.3
Bokeh 
 7.6
Handling 
 9.1
Value 
 9.4
Autofocus 
 9.0
Reviews Views Date of last review
15 56,145 Mon October 2, 2017
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average User Rating
87% of reviewers $219.07 8.27
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
supersize


Description:
Weight: 405g / 14.4 oz
Length: 78.1mm/3.1 in
Filter Diameter: 62mm
Min. Focus: 45cm / 17.7 in
Max. Magnification: 1:4.4
Diagonal FOV:
Horizontal FOV: NA
Horizontal FOV on Digital: 69.3 - 7.1 degrees
Min. Aperture: F22
Optical Construction: 15 Elements in 13 Groups
Buy Lens: Buy the Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Price: $279
Mount Type:
Price History:



Add Review of Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC Buy the Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
Author:
Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 15
New Member

Registered: February, 2017
Location: Plymouth, Devon. UK
Posts: 3

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: October 2, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $60.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Feels well built and is a light weight replacement for several lenses
Cons:

I am an out and out amateur lens reviewer. Most of my pictures end up on the lap top and do I not have Photoshop.

I was getting a bit fed up carrying a bag of lenses and a spare body so I have got rid of all my lenses bar a 50mm F1.8 DA and have replaced the spare body with a LumixTZ55 compact fitted with a 24-480 zoom. The compact is on my belt all the time and has begun to prove very useful.
However I have also purchased a Sigma 18-200 DC recently for 60 dollars and have found that this lens covers all my DSLR needs particularly for special times like air and motor shows. It is not bad at portraits as well but the 50mm is the best out of the two for that. The Sigma really is an excellent walk around lens although I understand there have been two further versions since the original.


If you are looking for a budget do-it-all lens then this might well be the one to look out for. It is the one with the red stripe.
   
Site Supporter

Registered: October, 2016
Posts: 153

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: February 13, 2017 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $100.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Light, Focal Range, Sharp in most situations, Good AF
Cons: Contrast can be a bit lacking
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 9    Value: 9    Camera Used: K-S2    Autofocus: 9    New Or Used: 9   

I was looking for a budget lens that had a longer reach than my 18-50mm Kit lens and would be as sharp if not sharper. Based on the reviews here I decided to give it a try. So far I am very pleased as this lens and it has earned the role of default lens that stays on my camera when I am shooting family events or not using one of my specialized lens.


Sharpness - Stopped down to F8 this lens produces very sharp images. I gave it an 8 but really it is more of an 8.5.

Handling - It is just the right weight and the autofocus is reasonably fast on my K-S2.

Color - Not as vibrant as some of my older Pentax glass but by no means washed out.

Contrast - My largest complaint is I sometimes need to boost the contrast in post processing.

Bokeh - Not nearly as good as some of my manual 50mm primes but palatable.

Aberrations - I only CA and fringing I have seen is in a couple of high contrast tree shots at 200mm

Overall - I have taken some really nice shots of my granddaughter which was one of my main uses for this lens. I give this lens an overall score of 8.5.



   
Site Supporter

Registered: October, 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 233

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: December 21, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $120.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: wide focal range, sharpness, contrast
Cons: some distortion at the very wide end
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 7    Bokeh: 5    Handling: 10    Value: 10    Camera Used: K-5 IIs    Autofocus: 9   

I bought this lens for a week's vacation on the Rhine last summer. I was planning on traveling light, so I took it and a Sigma 10-20. It turned out I didn't need the 10-20, with which I made four interior shots that I could have covered with the short end of the 18-200. This lens is light, sharp, and low in abberration, and its AF compares well with most Pentax screw-drive AF lenses I've used. I highly recommend it as a travel lens when the aim is to get the most punch into the smallest package.

Samples from the wide and long ends of the lens:

Skylight by Noel Parsons, on Flickr

Stolzenfels Castle by Noel Parsons, on Flickr
   
Forum Member

Registered: August, 2011
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 73
Lens Review Date: February 21, 2014 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: $200.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: Range, colours
Cons: Slow AF, soft, distortion
Sharpness: 6    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 6    Handling: 8    Value: 8    Camera Used: K200D   

Sometimes the allure of a all-in-one lens is just too strong, but in the end you regret nothing when selling the lens. The range is very good and the colours are rich and saturated, but the main reasons for selling were the lack of sharpness even when stopped down and very heavy distortion and weird, almost swirling bokeh like abberation at 200mm and near the minimal focus distance. Maybe my copy was defective, didn't bother to try another one.
   
Junior Member

Registered: February, 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 54

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: January 14, 2014 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $420.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Range, Sharpness, Bokeh
Cons:
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 10    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 10    Value: 9   

This lens is underrated. For 8x10 prints and smaller this lens is perfectly fine.
   
Veteran Member

Registered: October, 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 726

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: October 22, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $250.00 | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Nice all around, compact, built quality, IQ
Cons: Slow
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 7    Handling: 9    Value: 9   

This is my second favourite zoom lens (following it's brother the 17-70). If it is nice outdoor, this lens is on one of my cameras.

It's a utility lens, it does decent wide shot (18mm) and has a decent zoom range (200mm). Take it down a few stops and this thing is decently sharp and any range.

Aberration/distortion are minimal considering the range. It does tend to fringe a bit at longer range but it can easily be fixed in post.

Bokeh is it's major drawback, it's not ugly but it could be much better.

Handling is great, the lens is solid, zoom ring is nicely weighed (but creeps if held down), built quality is top notch. I wish the focus ring had a bit more travel when focussing manually (like most AF lens).

It's a great all-around lens if you want to travel light and still be able to take decent shots of pretty much anything life throws your way. It's not particularly great at anything but it does a very good job at being versatile.
   
Veteran Member

Registered: June, 2011
Location: Near Sydney, NSW
Posts: 331

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: April 8, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $390.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Basically the best superzoom I've come across
Cons: Superzooms are always superzooms
Sharpness: 10    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 10    Handling: 10    Value: 10   

In the pros I said -BASICALLY the best superzoom I've come across because I have had the pleasure of using the Sigma 50-500mm, which is incredible, but that's a pretty special piece of glass, and costs $1800 or something.

I should note that I have not used the Pentax/Tamron 18-250 or 18-270 - they could well be better but to be honest, I'd be surprised, because this thing is damn impressive.
It's sharp at just about all settings, but more importantly, the results are just quite pleasing. I owned the 17-70 f2.8 - 4.5 as well, and although it's supposedly technically 'better', I just never liked it. This lens just has that X factor... and 11x zoom is never a bad thing to have.

In the end I don't actually need lenses like this because I have pro level stuff (the 50-135 for one), that will of course do a better job - but I'm always sad to sell these lenses that have impressed me in their time with me.
   
New Member

Registered: November, 2012
Posts: 5

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: January 3, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $195.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Sharp and versatile
Cons: Focus
Sharpness: 9    Aberrations: 9    Bokeh: 8    Handling: 8    Value: 10   

I was surprise with this lens being better than the reviews that it has received, so I think its a highly underrated lens. Its sharp and takes good macro shots too. It handles quite well but I do miss the quick shift features of other Pentax lenses. But for value and performance, its really hard to beat.
   
Veteran Member

Registered: January, 2011
Location: Minahasa, North Celebes (Sulawesi)
Posts: 585
Lens Review Date: June 26, 2012 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $255.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: All-Round-ness, Relatively faster AF
Cons: No aperture ring, Body paint wears
Sharpness: 8    Aberrations: 8    Bokeh: 9    Handling: 9    Value: 10   

I have two versions of 28-300 and they serve me well, but lately I've found myself back to shooting landscapes. 28mm is not that wide. So I get this lens, problem solved. Paired with K20D, I can still crop images to mimic the reach of 300mm. Quality is not that bad, really, I did not expect much from zooms, but this lens seems to better than the 18-55 kit in my eyes. Colors, sharpness, and bokeh is good, I have no complaints. I've seen a site that compared this with the Tamron's version, this Sigma appeared sharper. I'm also under an impression that this lens gives wider than just 18mm, but I could be wrong. For those who wanted an all-rounder, casual-shooting glass, did not want to lost the wider end, still need a lot of reach, yet did not want to invest pretty penny into 18-250, this thing here is the best choice.

Sample photos:









   
Site Supporter

Registered: April, 2011
Location: Lost in translation ...
Posts: 17,708
Lens Review Date: August 3, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $225.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: Zoom range, zoom lock, convenient
Cons: Lack of sharpness, focus hunt, no aperture ring

Bonjour,

This is my oldest Sigma, and it's a good overall performer ... doesn't do anything really "bad", nor does it do anything really well either. I purchased it to have more top end as compared to the kit lens (DA 18-55mm AL "I") which came with my K110D. I have also used this lens on my later DSLR's.

The zoom range is convenient as a "walk around" lens with a good weight and feel. The zoom lock is nice and one can make this lens relatively "sharp", but you really have to work with it under the right conditions given how slow this lens is. Focus hunt can happen, but one shouldn't get too picky for an entry-level Sigma lens like this one. Basically, no huge gripes here, but no laurels either ...

What bothers me the most is the lack of overall sharpness, but I have never been convinced that WIDE range zoom of this type can be every good. I have also chatted with my friendly local (French) camera store guy and he stated that if I think that this zoom range is not adequately sharp for my tastes, then definitely do not get an even wider zoom range, like a 18-250mm ... (or maybe a Tamron 18-270mm, even though it is not in a K-mount version). All the same, I would like to try one like this just to compare the results.

Allez, salut et bonne journée, Jean le Frog
   
New Member

Registered: January, 2011
Location: Michigan (Summer); Florida(Winter)
Posts: 6

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: February 27, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $135.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: Light weight, zoom range, good autofocus, zoom lock
Cons: focus hunts occasionally

Bought this as a walk-around lens for vacations and everyday shooting. Nice weight and zoom range. Autofocus hunts sometimes. Often shoot full manual including focus. Found to produce sharp pictures in daylight even if overcast. Very happy with this performance.
   
Veteran Member

Registered: December, 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 515

1 user found this helpful
Lens Review Date: December 31, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $249.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: convenience, compact, all-in-one, zoom, affordable
Cons: slow, AF hunt, dust magnet, CA

This is a generic 'all in one' lens - kinda of like having a vehicle that's a cross over.
Don't expect it to be a car, a minivan and and SUV... it makes some sacrifices.

Good:
- It can take some decent shots and 'can' be sharp... just not so much at the edges
- Its fairly lightweight, yet feels pretty sturdy (feels almost 2x as heavy as the kit 18-55mm)
- 18-200mm is a very good range
- No zoom creep (yet)
- Its $249 - unless you're wanting a shorter zoom (50-200mm Pentax or 70-300 Tamron/Sigma), you're going to pay at least this much.
- Great for travel - no swapping of lenses

Bad:
- Fringes are not so great on focus
- Not the sharpest lens out there
- slow
- AF hunt - with moving objects you might as well take off AF.
- CA

Verdict: It came down to this or Pentax 55-300. I don't think I really need the long end 'that far', but I would appreciate the 4-5.6 of the Pentax vs 3.5-6.3 of the Sigma. This is essentially a 'poor mans' / entry level version of Pentax 18-135mm.
I'll probably use this as my 'main' outdoor lens. I have taken +5000 pictures on my 18-55mm kit since September, but I've been needing a little more reach, and the 18-135mm Pentax is out of my price range.
   
Inactive Account

Registered: June, 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4

4 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: October 24, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $160.00 | Rating: 9 

 
Pros: zoom range, image quality
Cons: zoom creep

I am very impressed with this lens!

I traded in my Sigma 28-200 because i wanted the extra room at the wide end. The 28-200 was bought in hopes of Pentax bringing out a full frame [but that's another story].

The 18-200 has far exceeded my expectations. It is way sharper than the 28-200 and the added wide angle is a real asset.

The resolution of the lens seems to keep up with my K20D, unlike my old 18-55 kit lens which worked great with my K100D but not so much with the K20.

My one criticism is zoom creep when i point the camera downward. However, resting my baby finger against the zoom ring solves the problem.

Bottom line - love it
   
Junior Member

Registered: May, 2009
Location: West Sussex, UK (Gap Year)
Posts: 30

2 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: October 26, 2009 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: None indicated | Rating: 5 

 
Pros: Convenience
Cons: Not particularly sharp, really soft on extreme edges

I bought this lens when i bought my K20D, only just getting into photography and not really knowing about the advantages of various lenses, quality etc. I have recently sold this lens, upgrading to a 16-45 f4. The main issue with this lens is the edge sharpness; i've been doing quite a few group portraits lately, and the people on the edge are ridiculously soft, even when stopped down to f5.6-f8. This zoom would probably be fine for travel happy snaps where weight is an issue, but for my purposes it was less than satisfactory.
   
Forum Member

Registered: September, 2008
Location: Rotherham, South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 55

4 users found this helpful
Lens Review Date: January 31, 2009 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $308.00 | Rating: 7 

 
Pros: Zoom range, ease of use, zoom ring lock
Cons: Maximum apertures, no FF capability

I purchased this lens nearly two years ago since I wanted an all-purpose lens for use when not doing serious photography, e.g. when walking or sightseeing. I also chose it because it gives me a reasonable close focus facility hand-held using the image stabilisation on my K10D. I would have considered the Pentax version but it wasn’t available when I purchased the Sigma; other slightly longer zooms have since appeared.

This is an excellent lens for the amateur providing good well saturated colour and sharpness for landscapes, portraits, occasional long shots for wildlife, and macro (1:4.4 nominal but 1:3 approximately with APS). It is well-balanced and easy to use and not too heavy to carry around all day. One has to accept that in dull light its speed is a limitation. The zoom ring lock is a distinct advantage to prevent the zoom extending when being carried. I purchased it to replace the basic Sigma 18-50 and 55-200 kit lenses and have not been disappointed. It will never replace lenses such as prime wide angles, long telephotos or macros but it does the job it is intended to do quite well and if one requres a long zoom range 11:1, there are only a few of alternatives and none what one would call "professional" quality.
Add Review of Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC Buy the Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top