Senior Member Registered: December, 2008 Location: MN, US Posts: 139
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: June 30, 2010 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 10 |
| Pros: | Build, constant f3.8, price | | Cons: | None according to the price | |
The best lens for the price.
Sigma re branded Carl Zeiss glass. Usable constant f3.8(register as f4 on my K7) through zoom range.
| |
New Member Registered: January, 2009 Location: Darmstadt (near Frankfurt), Germany Posts: 18
1 user found this helpful
| | Review Date: October 11, 2009 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 8 |
| Pros: | solid metal body, F3.8 constant | | Cons: | slow autofocus | |
As i started, this lens was the best you can get and i want it sooooo much ! Now i have a Tamron 70 - 200 F2.8, but if i need a lens not so large but good for making pictures in dark rooms (Snooker) i use one of my two Sigma 75 - 200 lenses. The lens is not so large (but heavy becaus the lens is made of solid metal) and made good pictures with the avaible light.
| |
