Author: | | New Member Registered: January, 2021 Posts: 7 | Review Date: April 2, 2023 | Recommended | Price: None indicated
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | | Cons: | | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 9
Value: 9
Camera Used: k-70
| | In my possession for about 2 years, great when it comes to close up and macro, interesting effects in portrait, where after locking the focus distance AF is quite fast. Small chromatic aberrations in Close up-macro when wide open, but easy to remove in postrpoceses Considering the price, I have no objections, even if it were more expensive it is highly recommendable.
| | | | | Pentaxian Registered: October, 2011 Location: British Columbia Posts: 377 2 users found this helpful | Review Date: October 5, 2020 | Recommended | Price: $225.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | 1:1 Macro, AF, focus limiter, aperture ring, superb sharpness, smooth bokeh | Cons: | No WR, minor CA, no IF, clunky AF/M clutch | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-x, K-5, K-1, Z-1, K-2
| | This lens is simply superb. I've had mine for around 6 years at this point, and I have no plans to get rid of it.
There are a few drawbacks, but only minor ones.
- The AF/M focus switch is the sliding collar type. So switching to MF is an extended affair. (Ie: Turn camera to MF, slide collar on lens to MF)
- It has a comparable amount of CA with a Pentax D-FA 100mm f/2.8 WR wide open.
- AF is a bit noisy, even for a screwdrive lens.
- It's not internal focusing (IF), so the barrel extends out very far at full 1:1 magnification (one must be careful not to smack it on anything)
- Plastic construction. (But solidly so)
The Pros easily outweigh the Cons.
+ Light to carry
+ Film and digital friendly (aperture ring)
+ Accurate AF
+ Focus limiter makes this lens useful as a short tele when not taking macros.
+ Reasonably quick AF (with use of the focus limiter)
+ It's sharp right at f/2.8 and only gets better until around f/11-16.
+ Inexpensive
If you're in the market for a macro and find yourself on the fence, I'd suggest purchasing it!
Are there better macros on the market in this focal length? Yes, but only marginally.
Certainly there isn't anything better with AF.
The bigger questions to ask yourself is if you want a longer or shorter focal length (IE a ~24mm, ~50mm, or ~200mm, since these will yield different levels of compression and therefore perspective at 1:1)
I'm happy with the results I'm getting on the K-1 with 36mp. | | | | Site Supporter Registered: June, 2010 Location: Somewhere in Southern Oregon Posts: 464 | Review Date: December 28, 2019 | Recommended | Price: $85.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Handling, feel, and the quality of the images it produces | Cons: | None, really, except perhaps size: it's a little on the large side | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax KP
| | I haven't had the lens - which I purchased used, but in quite good condition - for that long, but so far the results have been jaw-droppingly good. Especially with regards to IQ or image quality: it simply is capable of producing stunning images.
At a focal length equivalent to the traditional 135mm field-of-view - this macro lens doubles as a light telephoto and portrait lens - and it's great in both of those areas. The quality of images is equal to - and possibly better than - those of the best lenses I've used, both for my Pentaxes (analog and digital) and for some other cameras (including some fine Leica-branded lenses for my micro four thirds Lumix GX8).
It's a significantly larger (and heavier) lens than some of the tiny, jewel-like Limited lenses which I've used with my KP - but it doesn't feel either too heavy or unwieldly in actual use.
And, these days, since it's an older (and largely unknown or forgotten) third-party 'legacy' lens, you can acquire copies for, well, for really reasonable prices.
This is the first lens review I've written for PentaxForums - mainly because the lens is so cool, and so affordable, that I felt obligated to give it a 'shout out' to fellow Pentaxians. The two photos below show the lens mounted on my KP body - and one of the first pictures I took with it, converted to black and white. | | | | New Member Registered: March, 2017 Posts: 1 | Review Date: November 26, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $209.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | muy nitido, rápido AF, buena construcción/very sharp, fast AF, good construction | Cons: | El AF se pierde a veces/AF is lost sometimes | Sharpness: 9
Aberrations: 8
Bokeh: 7
Handling: 8
Value: 10
Camera Used: K-5
| | Increible relacióm calidad-precio, muy nitido a 2.8.
Por un lado es un objetivo increible, tanto para macro como para retrato aunque en APS-C puede ser demasiado largo, el AF es muy agil si se usa con el limitador, se echa de menos que sea quick shift, pero no se pude pedir todo por el precio.
El unico punto negaativo tal vez sea que el Bokeh no es de mi gusta, no tiene nada que ver con un Helios 44-m, siendo para mi el mejor, algo personal sin duda.
Como conclusión lo recomiendo sin lugar a dudas, tanto para macro como para retrato al no tener casi deformacion y esquinas muy nitidas.
English Translation:
Incredible quality-price relationship, very clear at 2.8.
On the one hand is an incredible goal, both for macro and portrait although APS-C may be too long, the AF is very agile if used with the limiter, it is missed unless it is quick shift, but could not ask all for the price.
The only negative point may be that the Bokeh is not my liking, it has nothing to do with a Helios 44-m, being for me the best, something personal without a doubt.
As a conclusion, I recommend it without a doubt, both for macro and portrait, as it has almost no deformation and very sharp corners.
| | | | | New Member Registered: November, 2017 Posts: 5 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: November 24, 2017 | Recommended | Price: $160.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | sharpness, bokeh, pretty fast autofocus, price | Cons: | none for me | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: K1
| |
Received it today so maybe too early to give opinion, but I already another version of this lens and already great lens to shoot with.
I deeply recommend this lens, not only as macro one but for portraits as well, the image quality is so amazing and you can find it at great prices too.
All photos are Jpeg directly taken from the camera without post processing, of course I can get even better images by working with the RAWs.
| | | | Junior Member Registered: March, 2014 Posts: 38 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 6, 2016 | Recommended | Price: $225.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Very, very sharp | Cons: | none for it's intended purposes | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 9
Bokeh: 9
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: Pentax K3, K-S1, & Canon Rebel
| | Although a rabid Pentax user, I have a Nikon D50 converted to IR by Lifepixel, and I have used Canon for macro from the start because of that incredible Canon MP-E 60mm f2.8 that operates only from 1:1 - 1:5, in effect turning your camera into a low powered microscope. No one else makes such a lens, so Canon is the only game in town in this regard, unless you want to go to the clumsy vintage bellows route.
I bought a Tamron 90mm macro of this vintage to augment the Canon close up system, and I used it to copy and digitize negatives against a light box, as I still shoot a lot of film, especially large format. My digital negatives were incredible, and I simply reversed them in GIMP, and treated them like any other jpeg file for posting on forums, and printing, where they equaled the 17mp (or crop) of the Rebel. Good stuff.
The lens was so sharp, easy to use and versatile I bought one for my Pentax system.
If you get a good copy at a good price, just buy it. You can always wear a Tamron 90mm Macro of any shade with pride - it's a true Cult Lens. The more updated version with the digital coating is just as good. Whether the digital coating makes any difference, is a debated issue. With the recessed element of this lens, and a hood, I'd doubt it.
This is about the sharpest lens you'll ever put on your camera. The in-house Pentax shake reduction works brilliantly with macro lenses, and you'll get the sharpest handheld casual macros possible with the combination of this lens and say, a K3.
The Tamron autofocuses well, but remember, a macro lens of any type has a huge helical bearing surface and hence large physical extension. And in the macro range you manual focus and move the camera back and forth. so you're not going to use this lens for sports. But for Head and shoulders into small flowers and insects, you just won't do better than this lens, so get it. And you'll spend less money than on a new Pentax macro as well.
I'll not add any pictures to this review because the posted ones are just superb and make all of my points as well as I could. By the way, the lens lock/limiting switch is very useful.
| | | | New Member Registered: November, 2012 Posts: 22 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 31, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $236.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Sharp with creamy Bokeh | Cons: | None really. | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: K5 IIs & K30
| | This is my first Tamron and is a great lens. It is made for Macro and Portraiture, not action shots. I was going to agree with many reviews that state the autofocus is slow. The lens is not pin point accurate when focusing on moving subjects. It does focus well on a still subject. So, considering what it is designed for, I would think subtracting points for slow autofocus is unfair. Plus, I love the collar switch from auto to manual focus, pretty cool design, and the manual focus is smooth and easy to use. A definite great value in today's market for used lenses.
My album link on Facebook includes a link back to this lens review. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10152642674520225.1073741864.53333...1&l=61b9164ede | | | | Veteran Member Registered: September, 2013 Location: Pasadena, CA Posts: 1,126 1 user found this helpful | Review Date: August 7, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $199.00
| Rating: 9 |
Pros: | very sharp, focus works ok on K-30, nice bokeh, good for both far and close range, very good color and contrast | Cons: | some color fringing in high contrast, some CA in some circumstances | | Excellent optics. Reminds me of a way 43mm ltd would look - great other than some CA are present wide open.
The subjective image quality compared to lenses I have would be:
DA40 ltd > Tamron 90mm (172) > 16-45mm > 55mm SMC Takumar F1.8 > Tokina 80-200mm F3.5-4.5 > Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 > 55-300mm > 18-55 WR
Color, contrast and sharpness are excellent. They are very close to DA 40mm limited, albeit marginally worse. Chromatic Aberration is present, but only some times, in many cases there is no CA to speak of. Particularly, I didn't see any with flower macros taken under diffuse lighting.
Autofocus is not bad on Pentax K-30. It struck me as similar to 55-300mm. The build quality feel is also similar to 55-300mm, but manual focus ring is nicer on the tamron 90.
| | | | Junior Member Registered: October, 2012 Location: Pathum Thani, Thailand Posts: 47 | Review Date: March 19, 2014 | Recommended | Price: $350.00
| Rating: 10 |
Pros: | Sharpness, bokeh, handling, weight | Cons: | None | Sharpness: 10
Aberrations: 10
Bokeh: 10
Handling: 10
Value: 10
Camera Used: MZ-S, K5
| | Bought this lens new in circa 2001. It's the version prior to the introduction of the digital coatings and it is probably the sharpest lens I have.
Brilliant as a macro, it's intended purpose, and great also as a short telephoto.
Very well balanced on K5 with battery pack | | |